Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #552488
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-12 04:52 -0800 |
| References | (1 earlier) <WvWdnSS4Q_MDniDLnZ2dnUU7-N0AAAAA@giganews.com> <n9jrh9$lbd$1@dont-email.me> <e994b002-30db-42b0-b37b-ef6d38376102@googlegroups.com> <n9k61s$8ii$1@odin.sdf-eu.org> <42379225-e51a-40a8-90c2-36347afe47a0@googlegroups.com> |
| Message-ID | <d8a5281e-1beb-41e9-97fd-014a54864c41@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: A 'magical' space-time ripple that wasn't believed, at first |
| From | "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> |
On Friday, February 12, 2016 at 12:07:50 PM UTC+2, jay moseley wrote: > I think Hanson is just pointing out that if there are ripples in gravity field ========================== why not dimples ?? ------- > that it is spurious to assume thst they are only consistent with relativity. > It may or may not be true that Albert first predicted but Ive never recieved > an explanation as to why these anomalies cannot occur in a Newtonian > gravitational model. > The other thing that isnt clear is in some of the reports I have read it > says the one arm lengthened briefly, but the other shortened! ===================== so what is better lengthening or shortening ? if lengthening is good then immediately after that comes shoehorning so ?? there is a battle there and not any United Nation U N police to make some law and order there ?/!! or may be i t is there ?? now the question will be the uniform color --of that police ?? we have to involve poets in there !!?? =========================================== > How is that possible with a wave? For instance in water the up and down ====================== oh GOSH now we have a problem with wet water in vacuum as well ?? so help me God !! TIA Y.Porat ==================================== >
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
A 'magical' space-time ripple that wasn't believed, at first Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 15:56 -0600
Re: A 'magical' space-time ripple that wasn't believed, at first jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-11 22:07 +0000
Re: A 'magical' space-time ripple that wasn't believed, at first Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 08:22 -0600
Re: A 'magical' space-time ripple that wasn't believed, at first jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-12 17:42 +0000
Re: A 'magical' space-time ripple that wasn't believed, at first Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 20:19 -0600
Re: A 'magical' space-time ripple that wasn't believed, at first jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-13 03:34 +0000
Re: A 'magical' space-time ripple that wasn't believed, at first Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 08:28 -0600
Re: A 'magical' space-time ripple that wasn't believed, at first Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 13:12 -0600
Re: A 'magical' space-time ripple that wasn't believed, at first Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 14:22 -0600
Re: A 'magical' space-time ripple that wasn't believed, at first "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-02-11 21:46 -0800
Re: A 'magical' space-time ripple that wasn't believed, at first "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 23:08 -0800
Re: A 'magical' space-time ripple that wasn't believed, at first Peter Lavington <peterlavington@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 23:57 -0800
Re: A 'magical' space-time ripple that wasn't believed, at first R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-02-12 08:44 +0000
Re: A 'magical' space-time ripple that wasn't believed, at first jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-02-12 02:07 -0800
Re: A 'magical' space-time ripple that wasn't believed, at first Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2016-02-12 11:36 +0100
Re: A 'magical' space-time ripple that wasn't believed, at first HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 04:05 -0800
Re: A 'magical' space-time ripple that wasn't believed, at first benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 14:28 -0500
Re: A 'magical' space-time ripple that wasn't believed, at first Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 07:23 -0600
Re: A 'magical' space-time ripple that wasn't believed, at first benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 14:43 -0500
Re: A 'magical' space-time ripple that wasn't believed, at first "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 04:52 -0800
Re: A 'magical' space-time ripple that wasn't believed, at first Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 07:23 -0600
Re: A 'magical' space-time ripple that wasn't believed, at first jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-02-12 06:40 -0800
Re: A 'magical' space-time ripple that wasn't believed, at first Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 09:04 -0600
define cOOlth noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 19:17 -0800
Re: A 'magical' space-time ripple that wasn't believed, at first jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-02-13 05:17 -0800
Re: A 'magical' space-time ripple that wasn't believed, at first "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 08:01 -0800
Re: A 'magical' space-time ripple that wasn't believed, at first Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-14 15:23 -0600
Re: A 'magical' space-time ripple that wasn't believed, at first "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-02-14 19:22 -0800
Re: A 'magical' space-time ripple that wasn't believed, at first "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 02:17 -0800
Re: A 'magical' space-time ripple that wasn't believed, at first "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-02-14 10:14 -0800
Re: A 'magical' space-time ripple that wasn't believed, at first "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 04:35 -0800
Re: A 'magical' space-time ripple that wasn't believed, at first "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-02-12 09:16 -0800
Re: A 'magical' space-time ripple that wasn't believed, at first "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 23:02 -0800
A 'magical' space-time ripple that wasn't believed, at first HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 07:38 -0800
Re: A 'magical' space-time ripple that wasn't believed, at first benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 13:01 -0500
Re: A 'magical' space-time ripple that wasn't believed, at first "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 09:52 -0800
Re: A 'magical' space-time ripple that wasn't believed, at first "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-02-15 11:07 -0800
csiph-web