Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > rec.arts.sf.tv > #174276

Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics

From Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups rec.arts.sf.tv, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, rec.arts.sf.tv, alt.politics.greens
Subject Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics
Date 2015-09-23 05:47 +0200
Message-ID <d6ellnF2olkU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <55FC4ECF.5C5E@ix.netcom.com> <m00rp5$bf9$2@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Am 23.09.2015 01:48, schrieb Ubiquitous:

>> http://dailycaller.com/2015/09/17/scientists-ask-obama-to-prosecute-global-warming-skeptics/#ixzz3m6i5gZfj
>
> I fixed the subject for you. HTH!
>

There are three branches in the government and all of its institutions:
Exceutive, Judicative, legislative.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_of_powers

The President belongs to the Executive branch of the US-government. (He 
is actually the head of the executive branch.)

The prosecution of (alleged) criminals does not belong to his duties, 
but to something like the police.


The courts and juries belong to the branch of institution, that deal 
with application of the laws.

The laws themselves are released by the legislative branch (usually some 
sort of parliament).

A law is a formal set of rules, that are universally valid (in space, 
time and people).

The president is now able to initiate a new law, that would make 
scepticism illegal, but is not able to prosecute certain individuals 
(belongs to the judicative) or release such laws (belongs to the 
legislative).

Also ALL scepticism must be punished, once a law against scepticism is 
released, since laws are by their nature universal. So you cannot create 
a law, that forbids one kind of scepticism and allows another type.

In case of global warming, the critique of such a 'scientific' result is 
punishable by law, you also must prosecute other types of disbelieve, 
like in big-bang theory or evolution.

E.g. (since forum this is about relativity) the critique about Einstein 
as person and/or his discoveries is then a criminal offence.

What about religion?

Could you allow that? I mean heresy is a crime and we should 
re-establish the Spanish inquisition.

Also the punishment could be more traditional (medieval)...

TH

Back to rec.arts.sf.tv | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-09-23 05:47 +0200

csiph-web