Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #151293
| From | "Jim Thomas" <JT@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.folklore.computers |
| Subject | Re: all those packages still need to be delivered somehow |
| Date | 2015-09-13 06:47 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <d5jhavFa8joU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (15 earlier) <msuomh$fmn$1@dont-email.me> <PM00051F8CF5C06FF2@aca236e4.ipt.aol.com> <alpine.LNX.2.02.1509121117030.14090@darkstar.example.org> <d5j9jeF8b4oU1@mid.individual.net> <d5jagfF8i21U1@mid.individual.net> |
"Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> wrote in message news:d5jagfF8i21U1@mid.individual.net... > "Jim Thomas" wrote: > >> "Michael Black" <et472@ncf.ca> wrote in message > >>> But I've seen that change, once I actually read the message, the number >>> changes to match the actual size of the message. >> >> Not surprising if it initially has just the header and can't >> work out the actual size until it has downloaded it when >> reading online. > Is that common? Is what common ? Reading online ? Plenty clearly do that. It's obvious that some like Morten and Barb don't, their posts clearly show up in bursts which shows that they are replying offline but that isn't true of most of the rest of the posters. > All this fuss about retention is simply retention of the *header*? That is a separate matter entirely unless I have misunderstood you. > ISTM that implies that the first site that processes a message (or > someone) is expected to retain it forever. Not sure what you mean there. > Could you elaborate on this? It's not clear to me what you want elaborated. I was just commenting on what the usenet client shows number lines wise and size of message wise. I wasn't commenting on anything else.
Back to alt.folklore.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
all those packages still need to be delivered somehow jgk@panix.com (Joe keane) - 2015-09-09 19:02 +0000
Re: all those packages still need to be delivered somehow Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-09-10 18:11 +0000
Re: all those packages still need to be delivered somehow jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-09-11 12:48 +0000
Re: all those packages still need to be delivered somehow Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2015-09-11 09:34 -0500
Re: all those packages still need to be delivered somehow jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-09-12 13:24 +0000
Re: all those packages still need to be delivered somehow Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-09-12 11:17 -0400
Re: all those packages still need to be delivered somehow "Jim Thomas" <JT@nospam.com> - 2015-09-13 04:35 +1000
Re: all those packages still need to be delivered somehow "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2015-09-12 13:50 -0500
Re: all those packages still need to be delivered somehow "Jim Thomas" <JT@nospam.com> - 2015-09-13 06:47 +1000
Re: all those packages still need to be delivered somehow jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-09-13 13:43 +0000
Re: all those packages still need to be delivered somehow "Jim Thomas" <JT@nospam.com> - 2015-09-14 04:22 +1000
Re: all those packages still need to be delivered somehow jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-09-14 12:50 +0000
Re: all those packages still need to be delivered somehow "Jim Thomas" <JT@nospam.com> - 2015-09-15 04:37 +1000
Re: all those packages still need to be delivered somehow Greymaus <mausg@mail.com> - 2015-09-14 19:13 +0000
Re: all those packages still need to be delivered somehow "Jim Thomas" <JT@nospam.com> - 2015-09-15 09:10 +1000
Re: all those packages still need to be delivered somehow Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2015-09-13 22:45 +0200
Re: all those packages still need to be delivered somehow Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2015-09-12 16:59 -0500
Re: all those packages still need to be delivered somehow scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-09-14 13:32 +0000
Re: all those packages still need to be delivered somehow "Jim Thomas" <JT@nospam.com> - 2015-09-15 04:46 +1000
Re: all those packages still need to be delivered somehow scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-09-14 19:55 +0000
Re: all those packages still need to be delivered somehow Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2015-09-14 18:12 -0500
Re: all those packages still need to be delivered somehow "Jim Thomas" <JT@nospam.com> - 2015-09-15 09:16 +1000
Re: all those packages still need to be delivered somehow jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-09-15 13:07 +0000
Re: all those packages still need to be delivered somehow mrr@sambook.reistad.name (Morten Reistad) - 2015-09-15 16:15 +0200
csiph-web