Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #690596
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-14 08:06 -0700 |
| References | <20a7649f-d3da-4d46-99df-da72ae0563d6@googlegroups.com> <bd9b4fa0-c3a8-4247-906a-51d36cb77b0c@googlegroups.com> |
| Message-ID | <d526f236-e3d2-4152-82b5-dd2c2cf00bab@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: Particle physics 2 |
| From | Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> |
On Wednesday, June 13, 2018 at 4:55:59 PM UTC-4, numbernu...@gmail.com wrote: > Obviously, cosmic rays are not propagating through 1800 meters > of bed rock. So it is questionable if cosmic rays are actually > propagating through your body. How do you know if it is background > radiation. Get background radiation or more like underground radiation. A good question. but consider: if it is background radiation, at 1800 meters, the radiation will come from all directions because the source is the surrounding rock. if it is cosmic radiation (particles), there is a preferred direction from above. when tests are done, there is indeed an excess coming from above. That excess increases as the testing is done close to the surface. And even greater excess from above for tests done at higher elevations (mountain tops). This is opposite what would happen if the source is the bedrock. On the mountain tops the bedrock is below, so the particle direction would be up not down. Since the observations shown the direction coming from above, then we can rule out background radiation. HTH, ed
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Particle physics 2 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-13 13:55 -0700
Re: Particle physics 2 Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-14 08:06 -0700
Re: Particle physics 2 Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-06-14 12:42 -0400
Re: Particle physics 2 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-14 11:52 -0500
Re: Particle physics 2 Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-06-14 13:04 -0400
Re: Particle physics 2 Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-06-14 13:08 -0400
Re: Particle physics 2 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-14 12:40 -0500
Re: Particle physics 2 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-14 16:01 -0400
Re: Particle physics 2 Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 05:39 -0700
csiph-web