Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #316457

Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this.

From Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this.
Date 2015-08-24 17:06 +0000
Message-ID <d41189FlgnnU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (8 earlier) <d1sep1FdbblU3@mid.individual.net> <mre1si$j0l$1@news.albasani.net> <mrf1e7$3ok$4@dont-email.me> <d40gmhFh1soU1@mid.individual.net> <mrf87h$95c$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 10:05:14 -0400, A.M wrote:

> On 2015-08-24 8:23 AM, Lloyd Parsons wrote:
>> On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 08:07:58 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>> 
>>> Nobody wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>
>>>> On 7/29/2015 11:53 AM, Lloyd Parsons wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 09:09:20 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>>> Since Linux on the desktop has been nearly dead for over 20 years,
>>>>> killing it off would be such a waste of time.
>>>>
>>>> Please tell everyone what Linux was like over twenty years ago, and
>>>> what would have given it the ability to capture a large percentage of
>>>> desktop users at that time.
>>>>
>>>> I don't expect any reasonable answer from you.  I know you're just
>>>> parroting troll lines about Linux.
>>>
>>> I remember when the Flounder troll was sneering at Linux's "0.24%"
>>> "market"
>>> share.  Now the "market" share is more like 1.6%, and that counts
>>> *only*
>>> distros that are sold *commercially*.
>>>
>>> Linux desktops may not be in every home, but Linux desktops are doing
>>> quite find in Microsoft's salted-earth territory.
>>>
>>> As for Lloyd, I gave up on that jerk long ago.  I dislike people who
>>> simply want to dick with people all the time.  Idiots.
>> 
>> but you're perfectly willing to quote me from all those 'snipped,
>> unread'
>> posts.
> 
> The worst part is that what Chris Ass Storm said is entirely wrong. For
> one thing, the market share is not at 1,6% but 1,5%. Secondly, whether
> the distribution is sold commercially or downloaded freely makes no
> difference for that marketshare as it is the _TOTAL_ market share of
> Linux on the desktop.
> 
> It's amazing how these people never cease with their lying and
> fabrications.

The 'sold' crap is just the new term they are using with the usual 
nothing at all to back it up.  Because on the desktop, who the hell 
actually buys it?  And if they want to, where would they do that?

I haven't seen a commercially sold desktop Linux disk or download in 
years.



-- 
Lloyd

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

M$ "backs down" on W10 forced updates ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-07-27 15:44 +0000
  Re: M$ "backs down" on W10 forced updates Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-07-27 17:15 +0100
    Re: M$ "backs down" on W10 forced updates vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-07-27 12:22 -0700
      Re: M$ "backs down" on W10 forced updates "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-07-27 15:27 -0400
      Re: M$ "backs down" on W10 forced updates ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-07-27 21:25 +0000
        Re: M$ "backs down" on W10 forced updates Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-07-27 23:30 +0200
          Re: M$ "backs down" on W10 forced updates ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-07-27 21:31 +0000
        Re: M$ "backs down" on W10 forced updates "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-07-27 17:39 -0400
        Re: M$ "backs down" on W10 forced updates chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-07-28 07:07 -0500
          Re: M$ "backs down" on W10 forced updates Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-07-28 13:25 +0100
          Re: M$ "backs down" on W10 forced updates Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-07-28 09:16 -0400
            Re: M$ "backs down" on W10 forced updates DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-07-28 18:15 -0400
            Re: M$ "backs down" on W10 forced updates chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-07-29 07:52 -0500
              Re: M$ "backs down" on W10 forced updates "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-07-29 09:03 -0400
              Re: M$ "backs down" on W10 forced updates Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-07-29 09:09 -0400
                Re: M$ "backs down" on W10 forced updates DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-07-29 09:20 -0400
                Re: M$ "backs down" on W10 forced updates Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-07-29 16:53 +0000
                Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 22:09 -0500
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. ronb <ronbNOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 03:18 +0000
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 22:34 -0500
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-23 21:38 -0700
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-23 21:09 -0700
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. "Dr. John Grubor" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-24 12:24 +0000
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-08-24 08:07 -0400
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 12:23 +0000
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-24 10:05 -0400
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-08-24 10:16 -0400
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-24 10:25 -0400
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-08-24 10:32 -0400
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-24 10:44 -0400
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 17:06 +0000
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-24 13:49 -0400
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Tommy Troll <elkabong99@Itroll.org> - 2015-08-24 13:58 -0400
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-08-24 13:19 -0500
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-08-24 14:14 -0500
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 19:29 +0000
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-24 15:56 -0400
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Tommy Troll <elkabong99@Itroll.org> - 2015-08-24 17:39 -0400
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-08-24 17:13 -0500
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Tommy Troll <elkabong99@Itroll.org> - 2015-08-24 18:35 -0400
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-08-25 09:23 -0500
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-08-24 15:30 -0500
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 20:32 +0000
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-08-24 22:39 +0200
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 21:03 +0000
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-08-24 23:09 +0200
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 21:18 +0000
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-24 17:28 -0400
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-08-24 23:28 +0200
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 21:39 +0000
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-08-24 23:46 +0200
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. ronb <ronbNOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 22:01 +0000
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Tommy Troll <elkabong99@Itroll.org> - 2015-08-24 18:05 -0400
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 22:56 +0000
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Tommy Troll <elkabong99@Itroll.org> - 2015-08-24 19:05 -0400
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-08-24 20:24 -0400
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 19:34 -0500
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-08-24 20:43 -0400
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-08-25 07:32 -0500
                Turdv IS mentally ill. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-08-25 22:33 -0600
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 19:42 -0500
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. ronb <ronbNOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 00:47 +0000
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Tommy Troll <elkabong99@Itroll.org> - 2015-08-24 20:55 -0400
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-08-25 08:18 -0400
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 00:49 +0000
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 20:00 -0500
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-08-24 21:03 -0400
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Tommy Troll <elkabong99@Itroll.org> - 2015-08-24 21:07 -0400
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 20:11 -0500
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-08-24 21:16 -0400
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Tommy Troll <elkabong99@Itroll.org> - 2015-08-24 21:34 -0400
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-24 18:56 -0700
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 01:50 +0000
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Tommy Troll <elkabong99@Itroll.org> - 2015-08-24 21:06 -0400
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 20:13 -0500
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-08-25 22:36 -0600
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 01:49 +0000
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 22:07 -0500
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Tommy Troll <elkabong99@Itroll.org> - 2015-08-24 23:12 -0400
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 03:23 +0000
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-08-25 22:37 -0600
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. ronb <ronbNOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 04:16 +0000
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-08-25 22:35 -0600
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-08-24 16:14 -0500
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 21:40 +0000
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Tommy Troll <elkabong99@Itroll.org> - 2015-08-24 17:49 -0400
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-08-25 07:26 -0500
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 12:40 +0000
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-08-25 09:50 -0400
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Tommy Troll <elkabong99@Itroll.org> - 2015-08-24 17:42 -0400
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-08-25 22:40 -0600
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-08-24 16:11 -0500
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 21:41 +0000
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 19:16 -0500
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 00:50 +0000
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-08-24 21:16 -0400
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. ronb <ronbNOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 01:17 +0000
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 22:09 -0500
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 01:48 +0000
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-08-25 07:42 -0500
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-08-25 08:52 -0400
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 17:04 +0000
                When are you going to check yourself in to the nearest rest home? GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-08-25 22:41 -0600
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-08-24 09:05 -0400
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-08-24 13:13 -0600
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 19:31 +0000
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-24 16:01 -0400
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 20:08 +0000
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-24 16:52 -0400
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-24 14:01 -0700
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-08-25 22:43 -0600
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Tommy Troll <elkabong99@Itroll.org> - 2015-08-24 17:51 -0400
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-08-24 17:15 -0500
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. Tommy Troll <elkabong99@Itroll.org> - 2015-08-24 18:39 -0400
                Re: Lloyd Parsons can't answer this. "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-24 15:57 -0400
              Re: M$ "backs down" on W10 forced updates William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-07-29 14:31 +0100
                Re: M$ "backs down" on W10 forced updates chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-07-29 11:28 -0500
                Re: M$ "backs down" on W10 forced updates "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-07-29 13:21 -0400
                Re: M$ "backs down" on W10 forced updates "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-07-29 13:26 -0400
                Re: M$ "backs down" on W10 forced updates Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-07-30 12:26 +0100
          Re: M$ "backs down" on W10 forced updates DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-07-28 18:13 -0400
            Re: M$ "backs down" on W10 forced updates "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-07-28 20:07 -0400
              Re: M$ "backs down" on W10 forced updates DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-07-29 08:44 -0400
                Re: M$ "backs down" on W10 forced updates "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-07-29 09:03 -0400
      Re: M$ "backs down" on W10 forced updates Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-07-28 08:57 +0100
      Re: M$ "backs down" on W10 forced updates DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-07-28 10:30 -0400
  Re: M$ "backs down" on W10 forced updates John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-07-27 09:19 -0700
  Re: M$ "backs down" on W10 forced updates "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-07-27 13:38 -0400
    Re: M$ "backs down" on W10 forced updates DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-07-27 14:28 -0400
      Re: M$ "backs down" on W10 forced updates "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-07-27 15:19 -0400

csiph-web