Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.atheism > #1960920

Re: Secular case against abortion

From "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk>
Newsgroups alt.atheism
Subject Re: Secular case against abortion
Date 2015-08-15 15:14 +0100
Message-ID <d38vppFkv0rU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <mqc4vj$vot$1@dont-email.me> <e5d71d91-4e81-407c-bebe-5cf913ff46c0@googlegroups.com> <mqmh3m$c8d$4@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

On 15/08/2015 06:03, Rudy Canoza wrote:
> On 8/14/2015 2:40 PM, Paul wrote:
>> So getting back to the original point -- there is no rational secular
>> case against abortion.
>
> Of course there is.  The developing baby is a person.  Killing it is
> murder.  Murder is wrong.
>
> Case closed.
>

"Murder" is a legal definition.

Once upon a time not so long ago, it was legally permissible to kill a 
black person, or a Native American -- it wasn't murder.

As long as the law says it is permissible, aborting a foetus is not murder.

Back to alt.atheism | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Secular case against abortion Paul <papa_fox@cybertown.com> - 2015-08-14 14:40 -0700
  Re: Secular case against abortion Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 01:19 -0400
    Re: Secular case against abortion Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 01:27 -0400
      Re: Secular case against abortion Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 01:51 -0400
        Re: Secular case against abortion Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 02:01 -0400
        Re: Secular case against abortion Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-15 05:17 -0700
      Re: Secular case against abortion "W*T*S*." <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2015-08-15 01:08 -0500
        Re: Secular case against abortion "W.TS." <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2015-08-15 02:51 -0500
        Re: Secular case against abortion Planet Visitor II <nappy@nosuchserver.com> - 2015-08-15 23:41 -0400
    Re: Secular case against abortion "W.TS." <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2015-08-15 01:04 -0500
      Re: Secular case against abortion "W.TS." <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2015-08-15 02:49 -0500
    Re: Secular case against abortion Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-15 06:40 -0500
      Re: Secular case against abortion Paul <papa_fox@cybertown.com> - 2015-08-15 14:45 -0700
    Re: Secular case against abortion MarkA <someone@somewhere.invalid> - 2015-08-18 21:45 +0000
      Re: Secular case against abortion Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-18 21:53 -0700
  Re: Secular case against abortion "W.TS." <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2015-08-15 01:01 -0500
    Re: Secular case against abortion "W.TS." <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2015-08-15 02:48 -0500
  Re: Secular case against abortion Carl Kaufmann <cwkaufmann@cox.net> - 2015-08-15 03:16 -0400
    Re: Secular case against abortion "W.TS." <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2015-08-15 02:44 -0500
    Re: Secular case against abortion MarkA <someone@somewhere.invalid> - 2015-08-19 19:59 +0000
  Re: Secular case against abortion "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-15 15:14 +0100
    Re: Secular case against abortion "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-16 15:00 +0100
  Re: Secular case against abortion Paul <papa_fox@cybertown.com> - 2015-08-15 14:42 -0700
  Re: Secular case against abortion MarkA <someone@somewhere.invalid> - 2015-08-19 19:57 +0000
    Re: Secular case against abortion MarkA <someone@somewhere.invalid> - 2015-08-20 16:49 +0000

csiph-web