Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Non-(sub)-standard C |
| Date | 2015-05-25 18:08 +1200 |
| Message-ID | <csfshvF6r0eU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (8 earlier) <09c2681d-0d7e-4223-b42a-931995387e08@googlegroups.com> <871ti5pu10.fsf@kst-u.example.com> <mjtej7$1vb$1@dont-email.me> <csfnpoF6ol5U1@mid.individual.net> <mju9ua$dle$1@dont-email.me> |
James Kuyper wrote: > On 05/25/2015 12:46 AM, Ian Collins wrote: >> Richard Heathfield wrote: >>> On 24/05/15 22:03, Keith Thompson wrote: > .... >>>> You've never seen long long int in use? Variable-length arrays? >>>> Flexible array members? <stdint.h>? Compound literals? >>>> Designated initializers? "//" comments? Mixed declarations and >>>> statements within a block? Math functions that take float or long >>>> dobule arguments? _Bool and bool? >>> >>> Of the above list, in production code I've seen // comments (notably in >>> a math.h header, causing the (C90) implementation to diagnose its own >>> code!), and I think that's all. Of course, comp.lang.c is another >>> matter, but it is a very artificial code environment. >> >> So you've never worked in a POSIX environment ... > > I work in a POSIX environment, and am still constrained, in much of my > work, by a coding standard that was written in 1993 that requires me to > write C94 (== C90 + 2 TCs) code. I don't remember ever running into any > POSIX feature that I needed to use which required or depended upon the > new features added in C99. Could you give an example? POSIX uses C99 and the types from <stdint.h> are frequently used. >> ... or worked on a Unix or >> Linux kernel? > > That's not particularly odd - I think it's safe to assume that most > programmers haven't done kernel programming, even among the ones who > work on Unix-like systems. But they are likely to have at least seen some code... -- Ian Collins
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Non-(sub)-standard C David Kleinecke <dkleinecke@gmail.com> - 2015-05-20 08:56 -0700
Re: Non-(sub)-standard C Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-05-20 18:02 +0200
Re: Non-(sub)-standard C rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com - 2015-05-20 09:20 -0700
Re: Non-(sub)-standard C Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2015-05-20 12:12 -0500
Re: Non-(sub)-standard C Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-05-20 10:53 -0700
Re: Non-(sub)-standard C David Kleinecke <dkleinecke@gmail.com> - 2015-05-21 09:44 -0700
Re: Non-(sub)-standard C rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com - 2015-05-21 10:22 -0700
Re: Non-(sub)-standard C Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-05-21 10:46 -0700
Re: Non-(sub)-standard C Andrew Smallshaw <andrews@sdf.lonestar.org> - 2015-05-21 19:39 +0000
Re: Non-(sub)-standard C David Kleinecke <dkleinecke@gmail.com> - 2015-05-22 10:13 -0700
Re: Non-(sub)-standard C Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-05-22 14:02 -0700
Re: Non-(sub)-standard C David Kleinecke <dkleinecke@gmail.com> - 2015-05-23 09:41 -0700
Re: Non-(sub)-standard C Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-05-23 13:37 -0500
Re: Non-(sub)-standard C Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-05-23 14:38 -0700
Re: Non-(sub)-standard C David Kleinecke <dkleinecke@gmail.com> - 2015-05-24 10:10 -0700
Re: Non-(sub)-standard C wpihughes@gmail.com - 2015-05-24 12:53 -0700
Re: Non-(sub)-standard C rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com - 2015-05-24 13:05 -0700
Re: Non-(sub)-standard C David Kleinecke <dkleinecke@gmail.com> - 2015-05-25 09:01 -0700
Re: Non-(sub)-standard C rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com - 2015-05-25 10:19 -0700
Re: Non-(sub)-standard C David Kleinecke <dkleinecke@gmail.com> - 2015-05-26 11:01 -0700
Re: Non-(sub)-standard C rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com - 2015-05-26 11:40 -0700
Re: Non-(sub)-standard C David Kleinecke <dkleinecke@gmail.com> - 2015-05-27 10:28 -0700
Re: Non-(sub)-standard C rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com - 2015-05-27 11:13 -0700
Re: Non-(sub)-standard C David Kleinecke <dkleinecke@gmail.com> - 2015-05-28 12:20 -0700
Re: Non-(sub)-standard C rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com - 2015-05-28 12:26 -0700
Re: Non-(sub)-standard C David Kleinecke <dkleinecke@gmail.com> - 2015-05-29 10:12 -0700
Re: Non-(sub)-standard C wpihughes@gmail.com - 2015-05-29 13:57 -0700
Re: Non-(sub)-standard C rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com - 2015-05-26 11:33 -0700
Re: Non-(sub)-standard C Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-05-24 14:03 -0700
Re: Non-(sub)-standard C Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-05-24 22:09 +0100
Re: Non-(sub)-standard C Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-05-25 16:46 +1200
Re: Non-(sub)-standard C James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-05-25 00:55 -0400
Re: Non-(sub)-standard C Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-05-25 18:08 +1200
Re: Non-(sub)-standard C Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-05-25 10:58 +0100
Re: Non-(sub)-standard C David Kleinecke <dkleinecke@gmail.com> - 2015-05-25 09:12 -0700
Re: Non-(sub)-standard C James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-05-25 18:40 -0400
Re: Non-(sub)-standard C Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-05-26 11:14 +1200
Re: Non-(sub)-standard C rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com - 2015-05-25 19:01 -0700
Re: Non-(sub)-standard C James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-05-25 22:03 -0400
Re: Non-(sub)-standard C Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-05-25 10:40 +0100
Re: Non-(sub)-standard C Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-05-25 22:50 +1200
Re: Non-(sub)-standard C David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-05-25 12:42 +0200
Re: Non-(sub)-standard C James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-05-25 19:00 -0400
Re: Non-(sub)-standard C David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-05-26 08:43 +0200
Re: Non-(sub)-standard C David Kleinecke <dkleinecke@gmail.com> - 2015-05-25 09:07 -0700
Non-(sub)-standard C Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2015-05-20 19:27 -0700
csiph-web