Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c > #56039

Re: Is this poor style?

From Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: Is this poor style?
Date 2015-01-08 14:11 +1300
Message-ID <ch63prFpgmjU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (5 earlier) <slrnmam2fv.4et.grahn+nntp@frailea.sa.invalid> <sFPqw.487139$7A5.252993@fx17.am4> <slrnmar573.4et.grahn+nntp@frailea.sa.invalid> <ch6108FpgmlU10@mid.individual.net> <1660e7ed-5e31-423f-87b0-d3020c098863@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Malcolm McLean wrote:
> On Thursday, January 8, 2015 12:23:46 AM UTC, Ian Collins wrote:
>>
>> Some of the more common instances I see are switch statements with way
>> too much code for each case which cries out to be extracted.  What's
>> easier to follow:
>>
> A Windows callback is often like that.
>
> I usually break it up, so a paint message will call "paint me",
> a create will call a private constructor and set the user pointer to
> it, and so on.
> However a Windows callback isn't really a single function, it's lots
> of functions with different parameters artificially packaged into one.

Lots (maybe most?) functions with big switch statements fall into that 
category.  The usually handle some form of protocol where the message 
type is the first byte or two, the rest specific messages.  One I had to 
re-write recently was a single switch with over a thousand lines used to 
process Apple MFI protocol messages.

-- 
Ian Collins

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Is this poor style? "S.K.R. de Jong" <SKRdJ@nowhere.net> - 2015-01-04 00:46 +0000
  Re: Is this poor style? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-01-03 16:58 -0800
    Re: Is this poor style? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-01-04 20:37 +1300
      Re: Is this poor style? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-01-04 02:32 -0800
        Re: Is this poor style? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-01-05 09:39 +1300
          Re: Is this poor style? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2015-01-04 22:53 +0000
  Re: Is this poor style? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-01-04 01:29 +0000
  Re: Is this poor style? Morris Dovey <mrdovey@iedu.com> - 2015-01-04 00:00 -0600
    Re: Is this poor style? Morris Dovey <mrdovey@iedu.com> - 2015-01-04 02:20 -0600
  Re: Is this poor style? August Karlstrom <fusionfile@gmail.com> - 2015-01-04 15:46 +0100
    Re: Is this poor style? Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2015-01-04 15:10 +0000
      Re: Is this poor style? August Karlstrom <fusionfile@gmail.com> - 2015-01-04 17:06 +0100
  Re: Is this poor style? Clark Smith <noaddress@nowhere.net> - 2015-01-04 15:30 +0000
    Re: Is this poor style? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-01-04 07:44 -0800
      Re: Is this poor style? Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> - 2015-01-05 00:35 +0000
        Re: Is this poor style? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-01-05 01:02 +0000
          Re: Is this poor style? Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> - 2015-01-05 01:43 +0000
            Re: Is this poor style? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-01-05 11:35 +0000
            Re: Is this poor style? raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-01-05 12:58 +0000
              Re: Is this poor style? Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> - 2015-01-05 13:14 +0000
          Re: Is this poor style? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2015-01-05 22:02 +0000
            Re: Is this poor style? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-01-05 14:24 -0800
              Re: Is this poor style? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-01-06 12:26 +1300
                Re: Is this poor style? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-01-06 02:40 -0800
              Re: Is this poor style? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2015-01-07 19:32 +0000
                Re: Is this poor style? Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> - 2015-01-07 20:03 +0000
                Re: Is this poor style? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-01-07 20:27 +0000
                Re: Is this poor style? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-01-08 09:55 +1300
                Re: Is this poor style? Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2015-01-07 18:13 -0600
                Re: Is this poor style? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-01-08 13:17 +1300
                Re: Is this poor style? Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> - 2015-01-07 21:02 +0000
                Re: Is this poor style? Rosario193 <Rosario@invalid.invalid> - 2015-01-08 11:22 +0100
                Re: Is this poor style? Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> - 2015-01-08 11:33 +0000
                Re: Is this poor style? Rosario193 <Rosario@invalid.invalid> - 2015-01-08 13:08 +0100
                Re: Is this poor style? Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> - 2015-01-08 12:54 +0000
                Re: Is this poor style? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-01-08 14:04 +0100
                Re: Is this poor style? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-01-07 13:57 -0800
                Re: Is this poor style? Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2015-01-07 18:12 -0600
                Re: Is this poor style? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-01-07 20:56 +0000
                Re: Is this poor style? Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> - 2015-01-07 21:18 +0000
                Re: Is this poor style? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-01-07 21:28 +0000
            Re: Is this poor style? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-01-06 11:28 +0000
              Re: Is this poor style? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2015-01-07 20:19 +0000
                Re: Is this poor style? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-01-07 16:05 -0800
                Re: Is this poor style? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-01-08 08:29 +0000
                Re: Is this poor style? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2015-01-12 22:08 +0000
                Re: Is this poor style? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-03-24 20:35 -0700
                Re: Is this poor style? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-03-25 08:43 -0700
                Re: Is this poor style? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-03-25 16:38 -0700
                Re: Is this poor style? Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2015-03-26 15:43 -0500
                Re: Is this poor style? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-03-28 08:57 -0700
                Re: Is this poor style? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-01-08 13:23 +1300
                Re: Is this poor style? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-01-07 16:53 -0800
                Re: Is this poor style? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-01-08 14:11 +1300
              Re: Is this poor style? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-01-08 11:10 +1300
        Re: Is this poor style? John Bode <jfbode1029@gmail.com> - 2015-01-05 15:54 -0800
          Re: Is this poor style? Rosario193 <Rosario@invalid.invalid> - 2015-01-06 11:03 +0100
            Re: Is this poor style? Rosario193 <Rosario@invalid.invalid> - 2015-01-06 11:10 +0100
            Re: Is this poor style? John Bode <jfbode1029@gmail.com> - 2015-01-06 06:03 -0800
              Re: Is this poor style? Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> - 2015-01-06 14:44 +0000
                Re: Is this poor style? "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2015-01-06 09:10 -0600
                Re: Is this poor style? Rosario193 <Rosario@invalid.invalid> - 2015-01-08 11:14 +0100
                Re: Is this poor style? Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> - 2015-01-08 11:31 +0000
                Re: Is this poor style? Rosario193 <Rosario@invalid.invalid> - 2015-01-08 13:06 +0100
                Re: Is this poor style? Rosario193 <Rosario@invalid.invalid> - 2015-01-08 13:19 +0100
                Re: Is this poor style? Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> - 2015-01-08 12:53 +0000
                Re: Is this poor style? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-01-08 05:49 -0800
                Re: Is this poor style? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-01-08 08:18 -0800
                Re: Is this poor style? Rosario193 <Rosario@invalid.invalid> - 2015-01-09 07:58 +0100
                Re: Is this poor style? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-03-24 09:28 -0700
                Re: Is this poor style? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-03-24 13:57 -0700
                Re: Is this poor style? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-03-25 08:28 -0700
                Re: Is this poor style? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-03-25 12:17 -0700
                Re: Is this poor style? Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2015-04-05 17:03 -0700
                Re: Is this poor style? John Bode <jfbode1029@gmail.com> - 2015-01-14 11:25 -0800
                Re: Is this poor style? Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> - 2015-01-14 19:41 +0000
                Re: Is this poor style? Rosario193 <Rosario@invalid.invalid> - 2015-01-15 09:01 +0100
                Re: Is this poor style? Rosario193 <Rosario@invalid.invalid> - 2015-01-15 09:35 +0100
    Re: Is this poor style? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-01-04 11:15 -0500
      Re: Is this poor style? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2015-01-04 21:38 +0000
      Re: Is this poor style? Dr Nick <nospam-4@temporary-address.org.uk> - 2015-01-05 07:27 +0000
        Re: Is this poor style? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-01-05 06:33 -0800
    Re: Is this poor style? Vincenzo Mercuri <nomail@yahoo.it> - 2015-01-04 18:56 +0100
    Re: Is this poor style? rouben@shady.(none) (Rouben Rostamian) - 2015-01-04 18:22 +0000
    Re: Is this poor style? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-01-04 21:35 +0000
    Re: Is this poor style? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-01-05 10:46 +1300
      Re: Is this poor style? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-01-04 15:36 -0800
    Re: Is this poor style? asetofsymbols@gmail.com - 2015-01-05 12:05 -0800
      Re: Is this poor style? asetofsymbols@gmail.com - 2015-01-05 14:18 -0800
        Re: Is this poor style? asetofsymbols@gmail.com - 2015-01-05 14:32 -0800
          Re: Is this poor style? asetofsymbols@gmail.com - 2015-01-05 14:37 -0800
        Re: Is this poor style? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-01-05 18:23 -0500
          Re: Is this poor style? Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> - 2015-01-05 23:32 +0000
      Re: Is this poor style? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-01-05 15:31 -0800
    Re: Is this poor style? Phil Carmody <pc+usenet@asdf.org> - 2015-01-13 15:00 +0200
  Re: Is this poor style? Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2015-01-04 15:07 -0600
  Re: Is this poor style? jadill33@gmail.com - 2015-01-05 15:03 -0800
  Re: Is this poor style? buja <buja66@gmail.com> - 2015-01-06 21:48 +0100
    Re: Is this poor style? Rosario193 <Rosario@invalid.invalid> - 2015-01-08 11:21 +0100
      Re: Is this poor style? buja <buja66@gmail.com> - 2015-01-08 12:42 +0100
  Re: Is this poor style? "S.K.R. de Jong" <SKRdJ@nowhere.net> - 2015-01-08 15:29 +0000
    Re: Is this poor style? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-01-08 12:03 -0500

csiph-web