Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #564862

Re: Nilsson Did Measure Gaseous H2O

Show all headers | View raw

Well, uh.  I'm an expert on water structure.  I'm a physicist.  I actually wrote a paper on it.  What did you do?  You did a few Google searches.   

My paper outlines a sharp departure from the standard model of water structure.  Undoubtedly you have no idea what I mean by this or why it's significant.  Nilsson, Soper, and Saykally are all at odds with each other.  They haven't figured out what I figured out.  They are arguing with each other as to why there is so much space between water molecules when their model--based on polarity being a constant--predicts there should be little or no space.  They are perplexed. The evidence is inconsistent with what Coulomb's Law predicts. 

I am not perplexed.  I figured it out.  I kind of figured it out by accident.  H2O polarity is a variable.  They overlooked the importance of asymmetry to polarity.  I didn't.  They also (or instead) overlooked the fact that H bonds achieve symmetry.  I didn't. Nilsson, Soper, and Saykally are all carrying assumptions that were in existence before the importance of symmetry was realized.  (And the thing that really has them trapped is this notion that ice is a lattice.  They, most likely, will never overcome this mistaken notion.) 

Nilsson, Soper, and Saykally are academics.  People in academia are very sheepish.  They are very good at following rules.  They are not very good at making discoveries.  They have done such a good job of writing papers that confirmed the validity of the standard model that it is incomprehensible to them that they missed something.  They missed something huge. 

I'm very good at making discoveries.  The trick is not to lie to yourself.  Most people pretend to understand complex things when they don't really quite understand.  They lie to themselves.  They pretend they have a full understanding when, in reality, they only have a partial understanding.   

Intellectual honesty is not something that can be taught.  You either have it or you do not.  You do not.  That is why you cry all the time.  That is why you act like a child. 

Your phony expertise with Coulomb's Law make you look ridiculous to me.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Nilsson Didn't Measure Gaseous H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 17:27 -0700
  HOH is lighter than most gasses, bu two of them is not noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 18:14 -0700
  Re: Nilsson Did Measure Gaseous H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-20 06:52 +0100
    Re: Nilsson Did Measure Gaseous H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 23:37 -0700
      Re: Nilsson Did Measure Gaseous H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-20 18:44 +0100
    Re: Nilsson Did Measure Gaseous H2O Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 23:44 -0700
      Re: Nilsson Did Measure Gaseous H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-21 17:03 +0100
        Re: Nilsson Did Measure Gaseous H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 11:58 -0700
          Re: Nilsson Did Measure Gaseous H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 04:50 +0100
            Re: Nilsson Did Measure Gaseous H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 21:06 -0700
              Re: Nilsson Did Measure Gaseous H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 16:26 +0100
                Re: Nilsson Did Measure Gaseous H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 08:52 -0700
                Re: Nilsson Did Measure Gaseous H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-23 05:07 +0100
                Re: Nilsson Did Measure Gaseous H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 22:18 -0700
                Re: Nilsson Did Measure Gaseous H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-23 17:58 +0100
                Re: Nilsson Did Measure Gaseous H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-23 10:30 -0700
                Re: Nilsson Did Measure Gaseous H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-27 08:00 -0700
    Re: Nilsson Did Measure Gaseous H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 00:22 -0700
      Re: Nilsson Did Measure Gaseous H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-21 16:09 +0100
        Re: Nilsson Did Measure Gaseous H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 11:46 -0700
          Re: Nilsson Did Measure Gaseous H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 05:00 +0100
        Re: Nilsson Did Measure Gaseous H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 11:47 -0700
          Re: Nilsson Did Measure Gaseous H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 05:26 +0100
        Re: Nilsson Did Measure Gaseous H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 11:56 -0700
          Re: Nilsson Did Measure Gaseous H2O noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 12:32 -0700
          Re: Nilsson Did Measure Gaseous H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 05:11 +0100
            Re: Nilsson Did Measure Gaseous H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 21:24 -0700
              Re: Nilsson Did Measure Gaseous H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 16:01 +0100

csiph-web