Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.math > #602166

Re: For all you doubters about my lattice --->oo , just draw a finite one here.

Show all headers | View raw

On Tuesday, June 13, 2023 at 12:18:54 PM UTC-4, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
> Dan joyce <danj...@gmail.com> writes: 
> 
> > On Tuesday, June 13, 2023 at 11:21:15 AM UTC-4, Ben Bacarisse wrote: 
> >> Dan joyce <danj...@gmail.com> writes: 
> >> 
> >> > On Tuesday, June 13, 2023 at 9:44:46 AM UTC-4, Ben Bacarisse wrote: 
> >> >> Dan joyce <danj...@gmail.com> writes: 
> >> >> 
> >> >> > You just need a piece of graph paper and a dark pencil or pen. 
> >> >> > I am using James's sequence instead of mine because his is 
> >> >> > the true lattice where mine is a rectangle. 
> >> >> > Strange enough, our sequence is the same sequence but 
> >> >> > my layout of directions are a little different starting out. 
> >> >> > Do all these steps in order with your choice of writing instrument. 
> >> >> > James's out going sequence of events for a square lattice is, starting 
> >> >> > with --- (RU=1,LD=2,RD= 1) 
> >> >> I don't know exactly what you are doing here, but since it seems to be about 
> >> >> drawing edges on a square lattice I don't know why the sequence is not 
> >> >> just a list of R, L, U, D (or any other four symbols). Instead, I see 
> >> >> pairs of letters, and = sign and a number. What do these mean? 
> >> > Ben, 
> >> > As an example --- 
> >> In maths, it usually better to define notation rather than give 
> >> examples. But I think I have only one question left (see below). 
> >> > (RU=1,LD=2,RD= 1) RU=1 just means a right line of one unit long 
> >> > followed by an up line of 1 unit long (always a 90 degree turn right 
> >> > or left in this case left) 
> >> I'd write "ru". 
> >> > Then LD=2 just means left down twice, a 
> >> > line of 1unit long going left and then another line going down then 
> >> > repeat that for LD=2 
> >> So I'd write "ldld" for that. 
> >> > always connecting each line and always at a right 
> >> > or left 90 degree turn depending on the command. 
> >> Do the rules of the game really prohibit no turn, i.e. are rr, ll, dd 
> >> and uu excluded? 
> >> 
> >> rl, lr, ud and du are excluded by the "only use each edge once" rule 
> >> which, if a turn /is/ required, will leave only eight valid pairs. This 
> >> might be why you prefer a "pair and count" notation. 
> >> 
> >> > The third command RD=1. is just... 
> >> 
> >> If I've understood, that is what I'd write with just "rd". 
> 
> > In this case 2 equal length lines at always 90 degrees at their 
> > connecting point. Neve two connecting lines forming a longer straight 
> > line.
> Yes, I can see that from your example, but the example does not answer 
> my question. Do the "rules of the game" prohibit a solution that has 
> rr, ll, uu or dd in it?
> >> So your RU=1,LD=2,RD=1 is my "ruldldrd"? 
> >> 
> >> Can you also state the claim about your sequence to which you want to 
> >> draw the attention of "all you doubters"? I.e. I don't know what people 
> >> have been doubting that you are now demonstrating. 
> > Many reply's in my original post thought it was impossible but now I am not 
> > sure if they are still doubters.
> But what are you claiming? I thought that you had accepted that the 
> original claim (an endless path that encloses, eventually, every square) 
> was not possible. So I am still wondering, what is it that people doubt 
> that you claim they should not doubt? 
> 
> -- 
> Ben.
I never claimed it was impossible. I said just the opposite that  was a proven 
fact that it is possible,

Back to sci.math | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

For all you doubters about my lattice --->oo , just draw a finite one here. Dan joyce <danj4084@gmail.com> - 2023-06-13 05:46 -0700
  Re: For all you doubters about my lattice --->oo , just draw a finite one here. Dan joyce <danj4084@gmail.com> - 2023-06-13 06:05 -0700
  Re: For all you doubters about my lattice --->oo , just draw a finite one here. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-06-13 14:44 +0100
    Re: For all you doubters about my lattice --->oo , just draw a finite one here. Dan joyce <danj4084@gmail.com> - 2023-06-13 07:56 -0700
      Re: For all you doubters about my lattice --->oo , just draw a finite one here. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-06-13 16:21 +0100
        Re: For all you doubters about my lattice --->oo , just draw a finite one here. Dan joyce <danj4084@gmail.com> - 2023-06-13 08:47 -0700
          Re: For all you doubters about my lattice --->oo , just draw a finite one here. Dan joyce <danj4084@gmail.com> - 2023-06-13 09:14 -0700
          Re: For all you doubters about my lattice --->oo , just draw a finite one here. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-06-13 17:18 +0100
            Re: For all you doubters about my lattice --->oo , just draw a finite one here. Dan joyce <danj4084@gmail.com> - 2023-06-13 09:47 -0700
              Re: For all you doubters about my lattice --->oo , just draw a finite one here. Dan joyce <danj4084@gmail.com> - 2023-06-13 10:02 -0700
              Re: For all you doubters about my lattice --->oo , just draw a finite one here. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-06-14 02:02 +0100
                Re: For all you doubters about my lattice --->oo , just draw a finite one here. Dan joyce <danj4084@gmail.com> - 2023-06-13 18:27 -0700
                Re: For all you doubters about my lattice --->oo , just draw a finite one here. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-13 19:03 -0700
                Re: For all you doubters about my lattice --->oo , just draw a finite one here. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-06-14 14:00 +0100
                Re: For all you doubters about my lattice --->oo , just draw a finite one here. Dan joyce <danj4084@gmail.com> - 2023-06-15 07:09 -0700
                Re: For all you doubters about my lattice --->oo , just draw a finite one here. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-06-15 17:29 +0100
                Re: For all you doubters about my lattice --->oo , just draw a finite one here. Dan joyce <danj4084@gmail.com> - 2023-06-15 11:34 -0700
                Re: For all you doubters about my lattice --->oo , just draw a finite one here. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-06-15 23:51 +0100
                Re: For all you doubters about my lattice --->oo , just draw a finite one here. Dan joyce <danj4084@gmail.com> - 2023-06-15 16:07 -0700
                Re: For all you doubters about my lattice --->oo , just draw a finite one here. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-06-16 00:12 +0100
                Re: For all you doubters about my lattice --->oo , just draw a finite one here. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-15 16:23 -0700
      Re: For all you doubters about my lattice --->oo , just draw a finite one here. Dan joyce <danj4084@gmail.com> - 2023-06-13 08:29 -0700
  Re: For all you doubters about my lattice --->oo , just draw a finite one here. Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2023-06-13 16:40 +0100
    Re: For all you doubters about my lattice --->oo , just draw a finite one here. Dan joyce <danj4084@gmail.com> - 2023-06-13 09:09 -0700
  Re: For all you doubters about my lattice --->oo , just draw a finite one here. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-13 19:49 -0700
    Re: For all you doubters about my lattice --->oo , just draw a finite one here. Dan joyce <danj4084@gmail.com> - 2023-06-13 19:59 -0700
      Re: For all you doubters about my lattice --->oo , just draw a finite one here. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-13 20:19 -0700
    Re: For all you doubters about my lattice --->oo , just draw a finite one here. sobriquet <dohduhdah@yahoo.com> - 2023-06-15 17:41 -0700

csiph-web