Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.usenet.kooks > #652304

Re: Feynman Did Most of His Work Over Sixty Years Ago

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in
<news:kqf7ebptdtp00dg3id4r4e1auuu803ogtn@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
first into the wood chipper again:

> FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again:

>> I don't have to put words in your mouth, Jim. You're retarded enough
>> to blather out all your stupidity all on your own, and you don't even
>> feel embarrassed by having done so.

> Oh, the irony is strong in this one.

Says the moron who's been repeatedly drop-kicked across Usenet for his
stupidity, as outlined in my .sig. LOL

>> Try reading what I write, Jim, instead of just cowardly snipping it
>> out. You'll find out just *how* wrong you are.

> What was it Sn!pe was saying yesterday?  Hmmmmnoww...

Let's let Tr!pe the Hypoxic ChickenFucker tell us... the dB on that is
astronomical. One word from me provokes Steve Hall into a torrent of
froth.

<snicker>

-- 

Shiny Tinfoil Brain (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know:
=====================================
The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier
Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which
should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create
*sinusoids*);

That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms;

That superposition is the same as wave interference;

That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves;

That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things;

That RMS isn't a DC voltage;

That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207
volts RMS L-L;

That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1;

The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave;

That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical
engineering, physics and control systems engineering;

What a positive or negative vector is;

That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per
Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero;

That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic";

That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2
positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron.

That water does not have negative poles. The oxygen has an
electronegativity of 8+, the hydrogens 1+.

That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* nucleal charge.

What the definition of the word "equivalent" is.

That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples.

That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the
atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842%
margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F.

That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of
a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does
*not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames.

That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes
into account molar volume.

That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error".

That water can be plasmized.

That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge.

That nuclear charge does not equal effective nuclear charge.

And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph.
=====================================

SPNAK!

<snicker>

Back to alt.usenet.kooks | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Feynman Did Most of His Work Over Sixty Years Ago Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 07:38 +0100
  Re: Feynman Did Most of His Work Over Sixty Years Ago Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 16:37 +0100
    Re: Feynman Did Most of His Work Over Sixty Years Ago Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 20:00 +0100
      Re: Feynman Did Most of His Work Over Sixty Years Ago Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 05:39 +0100
        Re: Feynman Did Most of His Work Over Sixty Years Ago Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 19:43 +0100
          Re: Feynman Did Most of His Work Over Sixty Years Ago Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 05:30 +0100
            Re: Feynman Did Most of His Work Over Sixty Years Ago Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 06:16 +0100
              Re: Feynman Did Most of His Work Over Sixty Years Ago Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 07:55 +0100
            Re: Feynman Did Most of His Work Over Sixty Years Ago Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-12 15:16 +0800
              Re: Feynman Did Most of His Work Over Sixty Years Ago Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 06:49 +0100
                Re: Feynman Did Most of His Work Over Sixty Years Ago snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-13 08:16 +0000
                Re: Feynman Did Most of His Work Over Sixty Years Ago Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 05:12 +0100

csiph-web