Re: The FCC Lays the Foundation for Ultra-Fast 5G Wireless

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: The FCC Lays the Foundation for Ultra-Fast 5G Wireless
Date	2015-10-26 19:19 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<bua2gc-kor.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References	(2 earlier) <ba16ce81-9c00-4ae7-8f1f-9b53abd50aeb@googlegroups.com> <pq32gc-ftq.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <a4e32aaf-eddc-42d9-98df-4b467ac3bd98@googlegroups.com> <4k92gc-4ir.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <fa948abb-58b9-4849-86b9-4f36faa99986@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Ross A. Finlayson <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Monday, October 26, 2015 at 12:01:06 PM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> Ross A. Finlayson <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Monday, October 26, 2015 at 10:31:05 AM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> >> Ross A. Finlayson <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > On Saturday, October 24, 2015 at 8:02:40 PM UTC-7, Ross A. Finlayson wrote:
>> >> >> On Friday, October 23, 2015 at 6:52:28 AM UTC-7, Sam Wormley wrote:
>> >> >> > The FCC Lays the Foundation for Ultra-Fast 5G Wireless
>> >> >> > > http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/The-FCC-Lays-the-Foundation-for-UltraFast-5G-Wireless-135457
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > > "It was once thought that frequencies above 28GHz could not support
>> >> >> > > mobile services because their wavelengths were too short and the
>> >> >> > > signal propagation losses were too high," FCC Commissioner Mignon
>> >> >> > > Clyburn said. "But industry engineers have now turned these
>> >> >> > > weaknesses into strengths by finding ways to use short wavelengths to
>> >> >> > > build dynamic beam-forming antennas to support high-capacity networks
>> >> >> > > that are small enough to fit into handsets."
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> EM radiation is hazardous in the environment, 
>> >> >> a "Clean, Quiet Air Act" is in the line for 
>> >> >> necessary preservations of the environment for 
>> >> >> the support of human development, generally.  
>> >> >> The "Clean Air Act" was to reduce to remove 
>> >> >> poisons in the air, the "Quiet Air Act" is to 
>> >> >> reduce EM radiation of microwave radio 
>> >> >> transmissions to suitably low threshold levels.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> Two bins of lab mice A and B: throw a cell phone 
>> >> >> in a bin, it's occupants fare degeneratively 
>> >> >> over generations (i.e. as of their physiology).
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origin_and_function_of_meiosis
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> WiFi?  _Plug it back in_.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> That's what compression and _not wasting 
>> >> >> bandwidth_ is for.
>> >> > 
>> >> > The ongoing massive rollout of distributed microwave 
>> >> > radio transmissions poses an ecological hazard to 
>> >> > human life.
>> >> 
>> >> This has been studied to death by just about every first world nation
>> >> on the planet for MANY decades now and NO adverse health effects have
>> >> ever been found.
>> >> 
>> >> Extremely high levels of RF energy, i.e. many orders of magnitude higher
>> >> than cell phones or cell phone towers, do have adverse effects on humans
>> >> which is why the FCC has rules for HIGH POWER RF exposure.
>> >> 
>> >> https://www.fcc.gov/encyclopedia/radio-frequency-safety
>> >> 
>> >> The EPA is NOT the place to look for information on RF energy.
>> >> 
>> > 
>> > It's like the guy for the company with the waste sample.  
>> > 
>> > "If that's clean water, you can drink it right here."
>> > 
>> > If you're not worried about electromagnetic interference, 
>> > maybe you should contract for a mobile tower in your yard.
>> 
>> That would be fine with me if the city would allow it; what a
>> concept, getting paid for excellent cell service.
>> 
>> FYI, electromagnetic interference and biological effects of electromagnetic
>> radiation are two entirely different things; the first has absolutely
>> nothing to do with living organisms.
>> 
> 
> So, you wouldn't mind if I put up a huge passive reflector 
> on my side of the fence, and dimpled it variously for 
> aesthetic reasons.

Not at all, though it would clinch my belief you are a raving kook.

> Actually, no you would, because it would bathe your house 
> in a wall of noise.

Not hardly.

> So, I wouldn't do that as it wouldn't be neighborly.

More likely you wouldn't have the skill required to do such a thing.
 

-- 
Jim Pennino

Thread

The FCC Lays the Foundation for Ultra-Fast 5G Wireless Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 08:52 -0500
  Re: The FCC Lays the Foundation for Ultra-Fast 5G Wireless jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-23 18:09 +0000
  Re: The FCC Lays the Foundation for Ultra-Fast 5G Wireless gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-10-24 21:50 -0500
  Re: The FCC Lays the Foundation for Ultra-Fast 5G Wireless "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 20:02 -0700
    Re: The FCC Lays the Foundation for Ultra-Fast 5G Wireless "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 08:39 -0700
      Re: The FCC Lays the Foundation for Ultra-Fast 5G Wireless Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 11:12 -0500
        Re: The FCC Lays the Foundation for Ultra-Fast 5G Wireless "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 09:46 -0700
      Re: The FCC Lays the Foundation for Ultra-Fast 5G Wireless jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-26 17:17 +0000
        Re: The FCC Lays the Foundation for Ultra-Fast 5G Wireless Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 13:16 -0500
          Re: The FCC Lays the Foundation for Ultra-Fast 5G Wireless jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-26 18:51 +0000
        Re: The FCC Lays the Foundation for Ultra-Fast 5G Wireless "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 11:20 -0700
          Re: The FCC Lays the Foundation for Ultra-Fast 5G Wireless jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-26 18:56 +0000
            Re: The FCC Lays the Foundation for Ultra-Fast 5G Wireless "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 12:03 -0700
              Re: The FCC Lays the Foundation for Ultra-Fast 5G Wireless jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-26 19:19 +0000
            Re: The FCC Lays the Foundation for Ultra-Fast 5G Wireless Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 14:11 -0500
        Re: The FCC Lays the Foundation for Ultra-Fast 5G Wireless "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 11:58 -0700
          Re: The FCC Lays the Foundation for Ultra-Fast 5G Wireless jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-26 19:07 +0000
            Re: The FCC Lays the Foundation for Ultra-Fast 5G Wireless Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 14:27 -0500
            Re: The FCC Lays the Foundation for Ultra-Fast 5G Wireless "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 12:35 -0700
              Re: The FCC Lays the Foundation for Ultra-Fast 5G Wireless jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-26 20:08 +0000
                Re: The FCC Lays the Foundation for Ultra-Fast 5G Wireless "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 13:32 -0700
                Re: The FCC Lays the Foundation for Ultra-Fast 5G Wireless jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-26 20:52 +0000
                Re: The FCC Lays the Foundation for Ultra-Fast 5G Wireless "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 15:15 -0700
                Re: The FCC Lays the Foundation for Ultra-Fast 5G Wireless jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-26 22:19 +0000
    Re: The FCC Lays the Foundation for Ultra-Fast 5G Wireless Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 11:09 -0500
      Re: The FCC Lays the Foundation for Ultra-Fast 5G Wireless "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 09:32 -0700

csiph-web