Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | polygonum <rmoudndgers@vrod.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: [OT] 500K users left WhatsApp when Facebook bought it |
| Date | 2014-02-23 21:31 +0000 |
| Organization | me |
| Message-ID | <bmv7lfF98tlU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <859hg99jgoq875nvpb1l1s3v0eeh472knb@4ax.com> <t68kg9trl8c3s9a3qrvq3j26f3oc0erpuj@4ax.com> <m4spta-h8u.ln1@7398004cd8ad880124144d3c685567d7.anonymous> <hekkg9p38m00h1l7hf31h9e0282k85dvc8@4ax.com> <ftokg9p1cih3qe4fmfhr0ss8c1r699espj@dim53.demon.nl> |
On 23/02/2014 21:11, Kees Nuyt wrote: > On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 16:59:07 -0300, Shadow <Sh@dow.br> wrote: > >> On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 19:44:06 +0100, "q.kontinuum" >> <achsis_of_elvis@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >> >>> On 2014-02-23, Shadow <Sh@dow.br> wrote: >>>> An obvious honeypot, with all the Russian names thrown in to >>>> lull people into a false sense of security. >>>> It's servers geolocate to the Rochester, USA. >>> >>> I'm not so sure. Maybe it's possible to test it... Following site >>> analyzed the protocol last autum: >>> >>> # http://unhandledexpression.com/2013/12/17/telegram-stand-back-we-know-maths/ >>> >>> The main flaw appears to be the missing end2end-authentication, which >>> makes MITM attacks possible. Some others pointed out that the >>> key-generation is based on message content, which is a bad >>> idea. However, the essential question is, is the whole client open >>> source? If so, these problems can me fixed. If not, the next question >>> is: Is the protocol sufficiently documented to implement a full open >>> source client? If yes, doing that would be essential. If not, Telegram >>> lost all credibility. >> >> Unless they are bluffing, the Telegram owners explain each so >> called fault ---- so maybe it is safe. Read the comment section. >> Which still does not explain why when I connect my connection >> goes through the USA. Surely it would route directly to Russia, or is >> the NSA hijacking my connection ? >> I'm in Brazil, BTW. > > > Hm, There aren't many direct routes from Brazil to Russia.... > > http://submarinecablemap.com/ > > >> []'s Do they not say that it is based in Berlin (rather than Russia or USA)? -- Rod
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
500K users left WhatsApp when Facebook bought it RS Wood <rswood@therandymon.com> - 2014-02-22 10:45 +0000
Re: 500K users left WhatsApp when Facebook bought it "q.kontinuum" <achsis_of_elvis@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-02-22 12:36 +0100
Re: 500K users left WhatsApp when Facebook bought it Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2014-02-22 10:28 -0300
Re: 500K users left WhatsApp when Facebook bought it "Andy K." <andy.k466@gmail.com> - 2014-02-22 15:20 +0100
Re: 500K users left WhatsApp when Facebook bought it "q.kontinuum" <achsis_of_elvis@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-02-22 15:37 +0100
Re: 500K users left WhatsApp when Facebook bought it Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2014-02-22 12:01 -0300
Re: 500K users left WhatsApp when Facebook bought it Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-22 17:38 +0000
Re: 500K users left WhatsApp when Facebook bought it Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2014-02-22 16:48 -0300
Re: [OT] 500K users left WhatsApp when Facebook bought it Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2014-02-23 13:34 -0300
Re: [OT] 500K users left WhatsApp when Facebook bought it "q.kontinuum" <achsis_of_elvis@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-02-23 19:44 +0100
Re: [OT] 500K users left WhatsApp when Facebook bought it Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2014-02-23 16:59 -0300
Re: [OT] 500K users left WhatsApp when Facebook bought it Kees Nuyt <k.nuyt@nospam.demon.nl> - 2014-02-23 22:11 +0100
Re: [OT] 500K users left WhatsApp when Facebook bought it polygonum <rmoudndgers@vrod.co.uk> - 2014-02-23 21:31 +0000
Re: [OT] 500K users left WhatsApp when Facebook bought it Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2014-02-24 12:35 -0300
Re: [OT] 500K users left WhatsApp when Facebook bought it RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-02-25 13:19 +0000
Re: [OT] 500K users left WhatsApp when Facebook bought it "q.kontinuum" <achsis_of_elvis@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-02-24 07:47 +0100
Re: 500K users left WhatsApp when Facebook bought it Fum <fum@fum.fum> - 2014-02-23 01:20 +0000
Re: 500K users left WhatsApp when Facebook bought it Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-23 02:55 +0000
Re: 500K users left WhatsApp when Facebook bought it Fum <fum@fum.fum> - 2014-02-23 08:50 +0000
Omea Reader (was 500K users left ...) RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-02-23 09:25 +0000
Re: Omea Reader (was 500K users left ...) Fum <fum@fum.fum> - 2014-02-23 10:00 +0000
Re: 500K users left WhatsApp when Facebook bought it Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-02-23 09:28 +0000
Re: 500K users left WhatsApp when Facebook bought it Fum <fum@fum.fum> - 2014-02-23 09:41 +0000
Re: 500K users left WhatsApp when Facebook bought it Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-02-23 09:44 +0000
Re: 500K users left WhatsApp when Facebook bought it Fum <fum@fum.fum> - 2014-02-23 10:03 +0000
Re: 500K users left WhatsApp when Facebook bought it Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-02-23 13:11 +0000
Re: 500K users left WhatsApp when Facebook bought it wjwlsn <ibillwilson@gmail.com> - 2014-02-23 11:14 +0000
Re: 500K users left WhatsApp when Facebook bought it Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-02-23 17:31 +0000
Netiquette WAS: 500K users left WhatsApp when Facebook bought it "q.kontinuum" <achsis_of_elvis@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-02-23 12:39 +0100
Re: Netiquette WAS: 500K users left WhatsApp when Facebook bought it Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-02-23 13:14 +0000
Re: Netiquette WAS: 500K users left WhatsApp when Facebook bought it Fum <fum@fum.fum> - 2014-02-23 16:04 +0000
Re: Netiquette WAS: 500K users left WhatsApp when Facebook bought it Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-24 05:34 +0000
Re: 500K users left WhatsApp when Facebook bought it Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-24 05:29 +0000
Re: 500K users left WhatsApp when Facebook bought it Fum <fum@fum.fum> - 2014-02-24 07:32 +0000
csiph-web