Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.astronomy > #273751

Re: WTC6 vs Alfred P Murrah building in Oklahoma City

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

je suis charly, in
<news:charlie-gordon1492-CDCA24.12165024082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu>
did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

> In article <ZtGdnQ0T_ee3qkbInZ2dnUU7-R2dnZ2d@giganews.com>,
> Rocky (aka Michael S. Guthrie of 6913 Maynard Road, Summerfield, NC),
> <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>> How many of you ever saw the similarities between the damage done to WTC6 
>> and the damage done to the Alfred P. Murrah building in Oklahoma City?

No one sane saw any similarities between OKC and WTC, especially as
concerns the non-existent nuclear weapons at both sites. You're just a
schizophrenic paranoid-delusional kook off his meds. Take your meds,
Mike.

Kook. LOL

> Since it was widely known that Oklahoma City was petrol/fertilizer chemical 
> explosion, that might have clued you in that WTC6 and all other buildings were 
> the results of an unfortunate pas de deux of chemistry and gravity. But no, it 
> must be magical nuclear devices.

Magical nuclear devices with speshul "detonators" that somehow make
the nuke not have any radioactive byproducts... it's that
soooper-sekret 'nucular fyooshin' detonator that everyone's been
talking about. I'ma go to Walmart and get 'em half-price. LOL

These kooks... always entertaining.

<snicker>

-- 

Michael S. Guthrie (aka Rocky)
336-643-6611
6913 Maynard Road
Summerfield, NC 27358-9206

Now that everyone knows who you are, they can get you the psychiatric
help you so desperately need. Perhaps they could call your mother
Paula S. Guthrie, given that in your mid-30's, you still live at home
with mommy.

Michael Guthrie (aka Rocky), your schizophrenic paranoid-delusional
brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are*
*wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid
the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy
theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic.

For instance:
=============================
A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video
*you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they
must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you
believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed
over the concrete and walked away for 33 years.

B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the
satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and
the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but
kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried
from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil
composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never
mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today,
let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your
kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at
some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the
nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was
"dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years".

C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic
replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally
radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon,
which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken
brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the
triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to
change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped
the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an
entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service
personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back
into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words).

D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your
original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite
uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you
k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an
EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs,
so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in
rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke
detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out
electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no
nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the
vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC.

E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried
deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up
your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but
somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that
the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that
miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding,
in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that
your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of
*solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL

F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your
broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to
underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first
because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but
for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to
your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite
uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time
the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've
proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of
sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL

G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your
broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a
desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility...
saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath
the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode,
where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive
metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the
vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why
did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not
just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the
WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP")
and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole
seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL

H) Your brain becoming more and more broken, in just one short day it
moved from G) above to now telling you there are *more* than 34 nukes.
Where does your broken brain stop, Ko0k? Billions of intelligent
nano-nukes covering every metal surface of the twin towers? Robot
"crisis actors" able to withstand the extreme radiation? All of NYC
being blow up, replaced by a CGI that we all are fooled by today? LOL

IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from
reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And
the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little
tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very
best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot
with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even
worked up a sweat yet.
=============================

Kook. LOL

Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

WTC6 vs Alfred P Murrah building in Oklahoma City "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 10:23 -0500
  Re: WTC6 vs Alfred P Murrah building in Oklahoma City gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 10:57 -0500
  Re: WTC6 vs Alfred P Murrah building in Oklahoma City Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 18:37 +0200
    Re: WTC6 vs Alfred P Murrah building in Oklahoma City "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 12:31 -0500
  Re: WTC6 vs Alfred P Murrah building in Oklahoma City jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 16:44 +0000
  Re: WTC6 vs Alfred P Murrah building in Oklahoma City Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 20:12 +0200
  Re: WTC6 vs Alfred P Murrah building in Oklahoma City je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-24 12:16 -0700
    Re: WTC6 vs Alfred P Murrah building in Oklahoma City Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 06:47 +0200
  Re: WTC6 vs Alfred P Murrah building in Oklahoma City Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 22:12 +0100
    Re: WTC6 vs Alfred P Murrah building in Oklahoma City "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 16:40 -0500
      Re: WTC6 vs Alfred P Murrah building in Oklahoma City Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 23:47 +0100

csiph-web