Roger Wittekind altered court transcripts to bleat out his lies.

From	Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
Subject	Roger Wittekind altered court transcripts to bleat out his lies.
Message-ID	<bd3eb7fb3542131d783ec701a61ffafc@dizum.com> (permalink)
Date	2015-08-31 06:56 +0200
Newsgroups	alt.conspiracy, alt.usenet.kooks, misc.legal, sci.physics
Organization	dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
Show all headers | View raw
<http://misc.legal.narkive.com/zSNeO9Nn/can-anyone-decipher-this>

Hi, misc.legal! Just bringing home to roost one of your old-timer
kooks... ready your pointy sticks, because he's even kookier now than
when you last saw him. LOL

Roger Wittekind, the broken-brained schizophrenic paranoid-delusional
conspiracy theory kook, woman stalking nutjob, malicious obsesso who
got smacked down by the court system when he tried to harass a woman
via the courts for having the audacity to try to protect her daughter
against his nearly two decades of stalking, and the guy who rolled his
tanker truck and got charged with failure to maintain control of his
vehicle... and now he's an unemployable loser spending his few
remaining days bleating out wholly impossible 9/11 nuclear demolition
conspiracy theories that violate the laws of physics in several ways.
Of course, par for the course, RockyRetard says everyone but him is
lying. All of NYC were paid "disinformation agents", apparently. Ask
him about his "speshul" nukes that had magical detonators such that
they wouldn't produce an EMP or any radioactive fallout. Ask him about
his magical nukes that could autonomously dig through miles of solid
bedrock in only seconds prior to detonating. Ask him about his magical
nukes that could somehow pick and choose which buildings they
affected. LOL

Some select quotes about Rocky (aka Roger Wittekind the schizophrenic
paranoid-delusional woman-stalking failed truck driver):

1) ======================================================
He didn't know how to get exhibits entered into evidence and didn't
know how to overcome a hearsay objection. The defense attorney's
objections were successful as to most evidence offered by plaintiff.
Plaintiff lost the case on a directed verdict motion and blames the
attorney and the judge for violating his constitutional rights. He
refers to the sixth amendment even though it has nothing to do with a
civil lawsuit trial. Since I didn't read any of the transcripts that
are apparently available by links, I could be completely wrong about
what happened. I am willing to look, and form an impression, and
report the results, but I am not willing to make a project out of
understanding a rant.

This website is not unusual in one sense. In-pro-per litigants often
blame others for their failure to learn enough to authenticate and
enter evidence in a civil trial. For some reason I can never get one
of them to clarify, they believe that common sense and logical
arguments should be enough to win a civil trial when one is right,
that the judge should ignore all rules of evidence when the in-pro-per
litigant thinks this would lead to the right result, that all evidence
they offer should be automatically admissible because it is on the
side of the angels. When they lose, it is always someone else's fault.

I noticed that even now, after the trial and after enough time has
passed to create a website, he still doesn't say anything about what
was legally wrong with a hearsay objection or what specifically was
legally wrong with the judge's ruling on any of the other objections
made by the opposing counsel. That means to me that he has still not
looked up the law concerning admissibility of the evidence.
=========================================================

It very quickly devolves into raucous laughter at the broken-brained
kook...

2) ======================================================
Even as stupid as you are you should be able to see what's wrong with
that . But, no...not perfect Roger. He never does anything wrong. He
never stalked that poor girl. She had on the same type jeans as he did
so that means she was hopelessly in love with him so its all her
fault. She looked at him so that means she was hopelessly in love with
him. I don't know why the judge and jury couldn't see that. It's soooo
obvious.

And here's MORE proof: He uses a laptop while driving. He takes photos
while driving. He's run his truck out of fuel not once but TWICE and
bragged about it right here on this group for all the world to see!!
And if THAT isn't the mark of a REAL truck driver I just don't know
what is! I know I don't do those things so I must not be a real truck
driver.

NOTE: He actually ran out of fuel *3* times in his short truck driving
career. LOL
=========================================================

3) ======================================================
You forgot that time he didn't set the brakes...
=========================================================

4) ======================================================
He wants everyone to believe he was pulling oversized loads barely 3
months outta truckdriver school.
=========================================================

Poor stupid schizophrenic paranoid-delusional Roger Wittekind... he's
been a loser and a liar for decades, and he's sliding downhill fast.

<snicker>

-- 

Roger T.E. Wittekind
PO Box 471
167 40th Avenue
East Moline, IL 61244
309-755-6374
309-755-6394

Roger Wittekind the woman-stalking failed truck driver from East
Moline, IL.

Roger Wittekind (aka Rocky), your brain is grasping at straws in
trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain
becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate
(which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes
larger and larger leaps of illogic.

For instance:
=============================
A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video
*you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they
must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you
believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed
over the concrete and walked away for 33 years.

B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the
satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and
the tower shaking being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but
kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried
from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil
composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never
mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today,
let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your
kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at
some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the
nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was
"dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years".

C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic
replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally
radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon,
which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken
brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the
triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to
change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped
the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an
entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service
personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back
into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words).

D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your
original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite
uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you
k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an
EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs,
so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in
rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke
detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out
electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no
nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the
vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC.

E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried
deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up
your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but
somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that
the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that
miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding,
in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that
your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of
*solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL

F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your
broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to
underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first
because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but
for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to
your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite
uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time
the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've
proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of
sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL

G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your
broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a
desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility...
saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath
the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode,
where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive
metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the
vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why
did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not
just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the
WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP")
and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole
seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL

H) Now you're saying the OKC bombing was nuclear in nature (MID:
<e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com>), and a new era of
widespread nuclear terrorism has arrived... proof positive that you're
off your meds, Roget Wittekind.

IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from
reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And
the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little
tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very
best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot
with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even
worked up a sweat yet.
=============================

Kook. LOL
Back to alt.conspiracy | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Thread

csiph-web