Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.astronomy > #272990

Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE is a complete idiot )

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Rocky, in <news:2tudnfquibdBgE_InZ2dnUU7-YednZ2d@giganews.com>
did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> 
> wrote in message news:b5c97d41a6dfdf65f6b4579e1c7eed52@dizum.com...

> Y<SMACKAKOOK!>

Retards aren't allowed to speak until they provide third-party
corroborable, peer-reviewed and sensible proof of the stupid shit
they spew, Retard.

Kook. LOL
 
> Rocky

Now, get to addressing the 14 ways your kook conspiracy theory
violates the laws of physics:

======================================================
1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of
collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep
below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to
drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact
that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal
*melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636
miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole
*ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why
the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep.

2) The EMP pulse wasn't an EMP pulse at all, it was satellite
uplink interference. If it'd been a nuke EMP (especially one
sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of the explosion (and
thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused the camera's
electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would have been
sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the immediate
aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized your
claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for
dozens of miles radius.

3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that
there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke.
If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have
shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was most
likely the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement
weapon sights that was the source. You didn't specify what type
of radiation was experienced, and I doubt you're smart or
educated enough to even know what types of radiation there are.

4) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be
sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by
people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you
k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the
order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame
the bombs were buried.

5) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron
source. It naturally decays over time, and its decay byproducts,
the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays,
include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon
poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger
being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start
any sort of nuclear chain reaction.

6) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as*
*it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling
vertical support column and *NO* EMP:
======================
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo>
You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column
buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No
amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP.
======================

7) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going
to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would
be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the
temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K?

8) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through
a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into
surrounding rock.

9) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic
taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 satellite
uplink disruptions in the video *you* provided) were detonated at
the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects were
experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft.

10) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel sent down to
service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source
triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic
basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire base at
37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology
to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4
blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area
the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced
to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched
for 33 years and maintained their viability) are supposed to
survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat?

11) You admitted (ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com)
that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers
(all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked
off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your
admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of
the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe"
(your words)?

12) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic
signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the
WTC site on 11 Sep 2001?

13) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris
kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep
underground, Ko0K?

14) Explain how these 19 nukes could tunnel holes from their
underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep, to directly
under the WTC complex... in 12 seconds... through solid
bedrock... prior to detonating directly below the WTC towers
(which, of course, fucks up your timing between the detonations
and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion
started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on
The Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.).
======================================================

There's now 14 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws
of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one,
point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who
can't grasp simple physics.

Kook. LOL

-- 

Kadaitcha Man (aka HalfADickRick Mather) is an AUK veteran from
way back. He was actually stupid enough to try to hook up with
that AUK pass-around girl Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries (aka Rhonda
Russo), but ended up booting her to the curb because she's just a
cunt hair away from being that nucking futs cat lady dragging a
folding cart filled with recyclables so she can afford to buy cat
food for herself and her dozen cats. He dodged a bullet, given
that she now looks like a reject from a zombie slasher flick, has
cancer, hypothyroidism, bulging neck goiters, rotting gums,
missing teeth, thinning hair, Dissociative Identity Disorder,
Autism and is just plumb nutz. HalfADickRick lost his better half
in a motorcycle accident, so even if he had hooked up with
Rhondumb, he'd have to get a surrogate to bed her. He's got
growling menacingly down to a science, but toothless old dogs
have had plenty of time to practice. He has first-hand experience
with gaiety, given that his oldest son wasn't raised right and
turned out to be light in the loafers... which limits
HalfADickRick's trolling abilities and precludes him laughing at
the sissies. So he lost half his dick *and* now has no balls for
trolling.

"Big things are made out of little things."
HalfADickRick Mather's Grand Unified Theory of the Universe.

Message-ID: <d7419da693ffc53a544d5e1569ac9bfc@dizum.com>
"all matter appeared simultaneously in all places at once (i.e.
everywhere at the same time)"
Delusional fuckwit HalfADickRick denying nucleosynthesis, nuclear
transmutation, universal expansion, hydrogen consisting of most
universal mass, cosmic background radiation, 21 cm radiation, the
very means by which matter came to be formed from energy after
the big bang, and most importantly, reality.

Message-ID: <9eb660cc06ece30da6a8e7a947a65dfb@dizum.com>
HalfADickRick believes these two statements mean the same
thing... he's too stupid to realize the contradiction within the
statements:
1) "When you touch something, you don't actually touch it because
the negative charge of the electrons in all matter repel each
other."
2) "everything you experience is experienced only within your
consciousness. That is, there is no reality apart from
consciousness."

MID: <269e51973939871be9eeaaef420f8a6c@dizum.com>
"Who said it's your eyes that see?"
HalfADickRick, yet again displaying his unfathomable stupidity.

"The Turing test is overrated anyway."
HalfADickRick, mad because he's too stupid to pass the Turing
test.

"The now you experience now simply moves to this now."
HalfADickRick's excuse for living in the past.

Message-ID: <2e6f960b0b8c4a738b1116b41865cb35@dizum.com>
HalfADickRick projects what he thinks of himself:
"A fairyboy with an inadequate penis."

Message-ID: <d4e79c0adde0074ee812eba8d9023f97@dizum.com>
HalfADickRick tried blaming his own screediness on a Visual Basic
bot he programmed, k'laming it's artificially intelligent and
able to hold contextually-relevant conversations without any
assistance... when challenged to put Fred Tehbot to work
producing 5000 intelligent and contextually relevant replies per
day to random posts, an easy task for a machine, HalfADickRick
started backpedaling, evading and hurling insults. In actuality,
he was assisting his tardbot by screeding right alongside it to
lend it the appearance of intelligence (but only the appearance,
because HalfADickRick's pretty retarded LOL). Spanked to tears
yet again by reality, he plonked and ran away, tears streaming,
fright-piss flowing, a plaintive "WHHHHAAAAAAA!" issuing from his
otherwise-dumbstruck mouth.

<snicker>

Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 07:46 +0200
  Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 18:26 -0500
    Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 18:55 -0500
      Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-16 09:50 -0400
        Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 09:21 -0500
    Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 04:22 +0200
      Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 21:39 -0500
        Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 19:47 -0700
        Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 07:12 +0200
          Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 00:34 -0500
            Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 21:17 +0200
              Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  ( more 4 FNVWE ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 18:35 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  ( more 4 FNVWE ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 04:19 +0200
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  ( more 4 FNVWE ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 22:04 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  ( more 4 FNVWE ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 23:24 -0400
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  ( more 4 FNVWE ) Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-16 20:41 -0700
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  ( more 4 FNVWE ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 20:56 -0700
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  ( more 4 FNVWE ) Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-16 20:56 -0700
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  ( more 4 FNVWE ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 03:43 -0700
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  ( to Sarah ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 23:28 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  ( to Sarah ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:26 -0400
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  ( to Sarah #2 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 09:20 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  ( to Sarah #2 ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 10:28 -0400
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  ( to Sarah #2 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 09:37 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  ( to Sarah #2 ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 17:41 -0400
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  ( to Sarah #2 ) Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-17 08:04 -0700
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  ( Checkmated checkmate ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 10:26 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  ( Checkmated checkmate ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:43 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  ( to Sarah #2 ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:43 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  ( to Sarah #2 ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 19:46 -0400
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  ( more 4 FNVWE ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 08:09 +0200
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  FNVWE Perimeter Walls ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 06:48 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  FNVWE Perimeter Walls ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 17:05 +0200
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  FNVWE credentials ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 10:23 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  FNVWE credentials ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 19:27 +0200
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  FNVWE is a complete idiot ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 12:45 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  FNVWE is a complete idiot ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 05:00 +0200
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-18 11:17 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-18 17:10 +0000
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-18 14:27 -0400
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-18 18:37 +0000
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  jim + seismographs ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-19 10:34 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-19 16:35 +0100
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  jim + seismographs ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-19 18:14 +0200
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  jim + seismographs ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-19 17:53 +0000
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  jim + seismographs ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-19 17:33 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-20 00:07 +0100
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-21 14:15 -0400
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-21 19:55 +0100
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 16:05 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 16:17 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-21 21:31 +0000
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-21 23:51 +0100
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  jim + seismographs ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-19 23:07 +0000
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-18 15:07 -0400
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  TVfolery ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-18 18:07 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  TVfolery ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-18 23:28 +0000
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  TVfolery ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-19 08:25 -0400
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  TVfolery ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-19 17:55 +0000
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  TVfolery ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 18:05 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  TVfoolery ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-19 09:21 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  TVfoolery ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-19 17:57 +0000
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-19 08:07 -0400
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 08:25 -0400
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-19 09:46 -0400
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-19 09:15 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-19 16:37 +0100
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-19 17:59 +0000
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 14:11 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 18:05 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-19 19:51 -0400
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 04:06 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-19 04:16 +0200
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-19 08:32 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-19 17:35 +0200
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  FNVWE avoided the Perimeter Walls ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 14:36 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  FNVWE avoided the Perimeter Walls ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 20:58 +0000
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  FNVWE avoided the Perimeter Walls ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:17 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  FNVWE avoided the Perimeter Walls ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 23:00 +0000
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  (  FNVWE avoided the Perimeter Walls ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:40 -0500
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE avoided the Perimeter Walls ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 07:22 +0200
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE avoided the Perimeter Walls ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 07:05 +0200
                Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong...  ( more 4 FNVWE ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 04:17 -0500
          Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... (laughing at FNVWE) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 09:14 -0500
            Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... (laughing at FNVWE) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 21:17 +0200

csiph-web