Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.usenet.kooks > #653772

Re: BREAKTHROUGH: Hydrogen Bonding as The Mechanism That Neutralizes H2O Polarity

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Sir Gargles Balls, Is Queer (aka Craptain Kneel Whorin' the
Pusillanimous Pail-Pooping Pooter Pirate of the SS Cut The [mus]Turd),
in <news:39vteb9pip9cnfr4f4lsrnlc5mproc8co4@4ax.com> did thusly jump
head first into the wood chipper again:

> On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 18:51:08 +0100 (CET),
> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

> You write like a high school dropout, dude! I will demonstrate
> how a Ph.D. in Journalism does it better.

Having your web browser constantly open to thesaurus.com doesn't
constitute your having a PhD in Journalism, Gargles. Especially given
that all your other browser tabs are open to trannyporn.com.

<snicker>

>> Your references do not support your contentions, James. You'll be
>> getting right on detailing exactly where, in each of your referenced
>> papers, they make mention of a variable polarity of the water
>> molecule... none of them do.

> The references you cite do not support your claims, James. Besides,
> you failed to quote from those papers where they discuss the variable
> polarity of a molecule of water.

>> In fact, two of the physicists who wrote papers that you reference
>> refer to you as either a "crackpot" or "nuts".

> In fact, two of the physicists that you reference say you are either
> a "crackpot" or "nuts." (period hugs word)

>> It's already been explained to you that the two spectral peaks of
>> liquid water which Anders Nilsson observed is due to the two spin
>> isomers of water, causing two water molecule hybrids with two
>> different H bonding strengths.

> It's been explained to you before that the two spectral peaks of
> liquid water observed by Nilsson are the result of the two spin
> isomers of water which cause two water molecule hybrids that exhibit
> two different H bonding strengths.

>> It's already been explained to you that H bonds are electrostatic in
>> nature, and thus their strength diminishes by the inverse square of
>> distance per Coulomb's Law. They do *not* get *stronger* with
>> increasing distance, that's just insane twaddle from your broken
>> brain.

> It has previously been explained to you that H bonds are electrostatic 
> and consequently their strength diminishes by the inverse square of
> distance per Coulomb's Law. The bonds do not become stronger with
> distance. That's just insane twaddle from your incapacitated brain.

>> That you continue to ignore reality proves your psychosis... you'd
>> rather continue on with your comfortable delusion that you know better
>> than every single scientist over the past 250+ years as you dismiss
>> and denigrate and deny all of the accumulated scientific knowledge we
>> have, than explore the possibility that you are an insane moronic
>> uneducated halfwit who is wrong.

> That you choose to ignore reality is proof of your psychosis. You'd
> rather embrace the delusion that you are more learned than scientists 
> over the past two hundred and fifty years whose research demonstrates
> otherwise. You dismiss, denigrate and deny a body of accepted scientific
> knowledge and fail to consider the possibility that your contradictory 
> ideas are seriously flawed.

>> You're attempting to twist scientific fact to fit your model, James,
>> which is a violation of the Scientific Method. You fit the model to
>> the facts, James, not vice versa.

> You attempt to mold scientific fact to fit your model, James. This
> is a clear violation of the Scientific Method which molds the model
> to fit the fact. Ergo, the reason you have become known throughout the
> scientific community as a fraud and a laughingstock.

>> Hence the reason you've become known across the entire scientific
>> community as a scientific fraud and a laughingstock.

> Notice how you created a paragraph where another was not called for.

>> You're no physicist, James. The sum total of your scientific education
>> consists of a single elective Basic Meteorology class, which you
>> obviously learned nothing from. Which universities did you attend,
>> what was your major, and what was your PhD thesis, James?

> You, James, are no physicist. The sum of your scientific education
> consists of a Basic Meteorology course from which you obviously 
> learned nothing. Which universities did you attend, what was your
> major and what is the topic of your Ph.D. Thesis?

>> You've been exposed as a moronic psychotic scientific fraud, James. 
>> Your theory has been torn to shreds using scientific fact and you 
>> cannot defend it. Each time you try, you blather out more moronic 
>> tripe that proves how badly broken your brain is, exposing more 
>> logical contradictions in your patchwork 'theory' made wholly of 
>> suppositions you pulled straight from your ass.

> You have been exposed as a scientific fraud, James. Your theory has
> been thoroughly debunked scientifically and is indefensible.

>> You've become a laughingstock, James. Can you not hear the howls of 
>> derisive laughter when you step outside your front door? The entire 
>> world is pointing and laughing at you, James McGinn, the moron who 
>> believes in a giant sentient sky tornado monster.
>> 
>> As proof that what I write above is truth, you will yet again evade 
>> substantively defending your moronic blather by running away from 
>> those tough questions that expose the gaping logical contradictions 
>> inherent in your 'theory', as outlined in my .sig.

> In closing,

And to think Gargles did all that while dressed in his schoolmarm
outfit and while he was getting pounded by a tranny. LOL

> you should rely more on clear, concise, factual, grammatically
> correct language and less on ad hominem attacks as such attacks only
> serve to expose you as a small, insecure individual.

Except your "clear, concise, factual, grammatically correct" language
doesn't convey as much information as my "clear, concise, factual,
grammatically correct" language, Gargles. You pedantic twat.

> HTH.

The turdsmith speaketh. LOL

-- 

Chimpy likes tickling pickles.
His picklecycle is a classic.
He visited Greg, who showed him his peg,
but Chimpy only likes Vlasics.

"It's no Vlasic for sure,
but my poor closet door",
said Chimpy as he kneeled on one knee,
"is already broken
so I'll get to throatin',
but after this I get to pee!"

But Gargles had one more condition
before being sucked to perdition.
"Put on this dress
and I'll do the rest,
imagining you're in transition."

The nickel slot glowed furiously hot
and slurping drowned out the sea noise.
Soon Gargles was done, he'd had all his fun.
It was quick because Gargles likes boys.

When Chimpy was done he smacked Gargles' ass
and said, "Now *that's* how to suck it!"
But no Golden Showers for Chimpy, alas.
Greg went to play with his bucket!

Bucket play done Gargles wanted more fun
so he told Chimpy it was his turn.
Chimpy didn't demur, Gargles dropped to the floor
and his throat got a case of cock burn!

"Not to worry", was heard from the retarded turd,
fapping blindingly fast like a fool.
"We'll put everything right by the end of the night.
Just swallow this, trust me, it's cool."

Gargles guzzled for hours before hitting the showers.
"How's the throat?" was the query. "No pain!
So when I am done, we'll have some more fun,
my throat's good so let's do it again!"

On into the night as the waves lapped the boat,
sounds of gagging and slurping and juice.
In that gay little boat, Chimpy battered on throat
'til Gargles said, "Let's call a truce!"

"I can't take any more! You've outgayed me for sure"
Gargles cried as he sat all defeated.

Chimpy beamed victory,
"You can't beat me, you see?
My gayness is just half depleted!"

<snicker>

Back to alt.usenet.kooks | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: BREAKTHROUGH: Hydrogen Bonding as The Mechanism That Neutralizes H2O Polarity Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-20 18:51 +0100
  Re: BREAKTHROUGH: Hydrogen Bonding as The Mechanism That Neutralizes H2O Polarity "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-03-20 16:11 -0400
    Re: BREAKTHROUGH: Hydrogen Bonding as The Mechanism That Neutralizes H2O Polarity diblert@evil.megacorp (Diblert) - 2016-03-20 21:03 +0000
      Re: BREAKTHROUGH: Hydrogen Bonding as The Mechanism That Neutralizes H2O Polarity "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-03-20 21:06 -0400
    Re: BREAKTHROUGH: Hydrogen Bonding as The Mechanism That Neutralizes H2O Polarity Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-21 08:03 +0100
      Re: BREAKTHROUGH: Hydrogen Bonding as The Mechanism That Neutralizes H2O Polarity "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-21 13:31 -0400
        Re: BREAKTHROUGH: Hydrogen Bonding as The Mechanism That Neutralizes H2O Polarity Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 05:46 +0100
    Re: BREAKTHROUGH: Hydrogen Bonding as The Mechanism That Neutralizes H2O Polarity Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-21 16:49 +0800
      Re: BREAKTHROUGH: Hydrogen Bonding as The Mechanism That Neutralizes H2O Polarity "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-03-21 10:07 -0400
  Re: BREAKTHROUGH: Hydrogen Bonding as The Mechanism That Neutralizes H2O Polarity Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-20 14:39 -0600
    Re: BREAKTHROUGH: Hydrogen Bonding as The Mechanism That Neutralizes H2O Polarity Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-21 05:47 +0100
  Re: BREAKTHROUGH: Hydrogen Bonding as The Mechanism That Neutralizes H2O Polarity Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-20 21:40 +0100
    Re: BREAKTHROUGH: Hydrogen Bonding as The Mechanism That Neutralizes H2O Polarity Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-21 06:24 +0100
  Re: BREAKTHROUGH: Hydrogen Bonding as The Mechanism That Neutralizes H2O Polarity Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-21 16:31 +0100
    Re: BREAKTHROUGH: Hydrogen Bonding as The Mechanism That Neutralizes H2O Polarity Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 05:16 +0100
      Re: BREAKTHROUGH: Hydrogen Bonding as The Mechanism That Neutralizes H2O Polarity Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 16:01 +0100
        Re: BREAKTHROUGH: Hydrogen Bonding as The Mechanism That Neutralizes H2O Polarity Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-22 09:40 -0600
          Re: BREAKTHROUGH: Hydrogen Bonding as The Mechanism That Neutralizes H2O Polarity snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-22 17:21 +0000
        Re: BREAKTHROUGH: Hydrogen Bonding as The Mechanism That Neutralizes H2O Polarity Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-23 04:25 +0100
          Re: BREAKTHROUGH: Hydrogen Bonding as The Mechanism That Neutralizes H2O Polarity Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-23 18:33 +0100

csiph-web