Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.php > #7743
| From | "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.php |
| Subject | Re: Simpler way to validate form fields? |
| Date | 2012-12-07 11:56 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <aie0bqFd55fU1@mid.uni-berlin.de> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <oagub8t658vanhdeajl0vgkvurn2ji7cve@4ax.com> <qr81c8d7bqr1u7gtum1ikb840ampn9ej2u@4ax.com> <m6h1c8t93qrlcpsc7lpsvqmbd8ook9ldov@4ax.com> <aic0vpFu5u3U1@mid.uni-berlin.de> <tag3c8pk0dj2vusjn1gd7ebmhp1ik4kpk1@4ax.com> |
Am 07.12.2012 11:15, schrieb Gilles: > On Thu, 06 Dec 2012 17:55:21 +0100, "M. Strobel" > <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> wrote: >> The date verification problems are a all time favorite in programming. >> >> But to the regular expression: they just pick the pattern where they find it, so this >> is always a tolerant and save input reading. You might as well leave off the ^ and $ >> delimiters. > > It's better to keep ^.../ so that it doesn't allow garbage like > "qdfqdflqk 11/11/2000 qsdjflqksdfjql". Your decision. I think error tolerant is more user friendly. And you can be sure, that a regular expression is the best possible input filter, no need for filter_var() in this case. /Str. P.S. I am waiting for someone to point out that only the best possible regexp is the best possible input filter.
Back to comp.lang.php | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Simpler way to validate form fields? Gilles <nospam@nospam.com> - 2012-12-04 23:37 +0100
Re: Simpler way to validate form fields? "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2012-12-04 23:44 +0000
Re: Simpler way to validate form fields? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-12-04 19:04 -0500
Re: Simpler way to validate form fields? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-12-04 19:07 -0500
Re: Simpler way to validate form fields? Gilles <nospam@nospam.com> - 2012-12-05 11:32 +0100
Re: Simpler way to validate form fields? "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> - 2012-12-05 12:49 +0100
Re: Simpler way to validate form fields? "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> - 2012-12-05 10:56 +0100
Re: Simpler way to validate form fields? Gilles <nospam@nospam.com> - 2012-12-05 11:36 +0100
Re: Simpler way to validate form fields? "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> - 2012-12-05 11:52 +0100
Re: Simpler way to validate form fields? "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> - 2012-12-05 12:09 +0100
Re: Simpler way to validate form fields? Gilles <nospam@nospam.com> - 2012-12-06 14:43 +0100
Re: Simpler way to validate form fields? Gilles <nospam@nospam.com> - 2012-12-06 14:55 +0100
Re: Simpler way to validate form fields? "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> - 2012-12-06 17:50 +0100
Re: Simpler way to validate form fields? Gilles <nospam@nospam.com> - 2012-12-06 17:51 +0100
Re: Simpler way to validate form fields? Gilles <nospam@nospam.com> - 2012-12-06 17:50 +0100
Re: Simpler way to validate form fields? "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> - 2012-12-06 17:55 +0100
Re: Simpler way to validate form fields? Gilles <nospam@nospam.com> - 2012-12-07 11:15 +0100
Re: Simpler way to validate form fields? "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> - 2012-12-07 11:56 +0100
csiph-web