Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: inline functions |
| Date | 2012-11-30 07:44 +1300 |
| Message-ID | <ahpoo0Fmib8U3@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <Fd6dnWil9-L98S7NnZ2dnUVZ7oSdnZ2d@lyse.net> <slrnkbd0d4.1jc.grahn+nntp@frailea.sa.invalid> <50B684C5.10109@verizon.net> <c8bb4fc6-5177-4657-9f58-bb6846d9d3eb@googlegroups.com> <k9813l$ttv$1@dont-email.me> |
James Kuyper wrote: > On 11/29/2012 10:24 AM, Malcolm McLean wrote: > .... >> But I usually find diagnostic printfs() easier to work with than debuggers. > > In my experience, that depends upon the debugger, the compiler, and the > type of problem being debugged. We used to use the Irix MIPS-Pro C > compiler, and I used dbx to debug problems when necessary; I only rarely > felt the need to use debugging printf()s. We're now using exclusively > gcc, and I have only gdb to debug with, and even when I compile with > -O0, the behavior of the code as displayed by gdb quite frequently > deviates significantly from what I wrote. I can't be sure whether this > is due to the compiler or the debugger, or both. > As a result, I've often found it necessary to use debugging printf()s to > extract information about what's going on that's actually consistent > with the way I wrote the code. If you are working on OS X, Solaris or FeeeBSD, you can insert DTrace probes in your code to extract information about what's going on and leave them there to help you analyse performance in production. Very handy! -- Ian Collins
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
inline functions "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-11-24 12:20 +0000
Re: inline functions SG <sgesemann@gmail.invalid> - 2012-11-24 14:52 +0100
Re: inline functions "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-11-24 14:48 +0000
Re: inline functions Joost Kraaijeveld <J.Kraaijeveld@Askesis.nl> - 2012-11-24 15:59 +0100
Re: inline functions Alain Ketterlin <alain@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> - 2012-11-24 16:25 +0100
Re: inline functions Johann Klammer <klammerj@NOSPAM.a1.net> - 2012-11-24 19:18 +0100
Re: inline functions Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-11-24 15:07 +0000
Re: inline functions "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-11-24 15:33 +0000
Re: inline functions Alain Ketterlin <alain@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> - 2012-11-24 17:17 +0100
Re: inline functions "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-11-24 16:39 +0000
Re: inline functions Alain Ketterlin <alain@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> - 2012-11-24 18:13 +0100
Re: inline functions Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-11-24 19:36 +0100
Re: inline functions Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@riseup.net> - 2012-12-05 03:19 -0200
Re: inline functions Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-12-05 10:57 +0100
Re: inline functions Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@riseup.net> - 2012-12-05 15:34 -0200
Re: inline functions Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-11-25 09:43 +0000
Re: inline functions Alain Ketterlin <alain@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> - 2012-11-25 11:32 +0100
Re: inline functions Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-11-27 21:55 +0000
Re: inline functions "christian.bau" <christian.bau@cbau.wanadoo.co.uk> - 2012-11-26 04:16 -0800
Re: inline functions David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2012-11-26 14:13 +0100
Re: inline functions Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-11-28 21:27 +0000
Re: inline functions James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-11-28 16:40 -0500
Re: inline functions Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> - 2012-11-28 14:15 -0800
Re: inline functions Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@riseup.net> - 2012-11-29 00:02 -0200
Re: inline functions Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-11-29 07:24 -0800
Re: inline functions James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-11-29 11:04 -0500
Re: inline functions Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@riseup.net> - 2012-11-29 14:44 -0200
Re: inline functions Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-11-29 12:44 -0600
Re: inline functions Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@riseup.net> - 2012-11-29 20:43 -0200
Re: inline functions Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-11-29 20:14 -0600
Re: inline functions Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-11-30 07:44 +1300
Re: inline functions Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@riseup.net> - 2012-11-29 20:38 -0200
Re: inline functions Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-12-05 03:17 +0000
Re: inline functions Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2012-12-05 11:26 +0100
Re: inline functions David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2012-11-26 11:23 +0100
Re: inline functions "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-11-26 13:01 +0000
Re: inline functions David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2012-11-26 14:24 +0100
Re: inline functions Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-11-26 05:35 -0800
Re: inline functions Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-11-26 07:57 -0600
Re: inline functions Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-11-26 07:07 -0800
Re: inline functions Rosario1903 <Rosario@invalid.invalid> - 2012-11-27 09:46 +0100
Re: inline functions David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2012-11-27 10:50 +0100
Re: inline functions "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-11-26 14:14 +0000
Re: inline functions "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-11-26 15:14 +0000
Re: inline functions Rosario1903 <Rosario@invalid.invalid> - 2012-11-27 09:46 +0100
Re: inline functions "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-11-27 14:41 +0000
Re: inline functions David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2012-11-27 11:01 +0100
Re: inline functions "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-11-27 14:37 +0000
Re: inline functions Alain Ketterlin <alain@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> - 2012-11-27 18:22 +0100
Re: inline functions James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-11-27 12:55 -0500
Re: inline functions Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-11-27 22:06 +0000
Re: inline functions David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2012-11-29 09:47 +0100
Re: inline functions glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2012-11-26 14:39 +0000
Re: inline functions Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-11-24 07:20 -0800
Re: inline functions James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-11-24 10:44 -0500
Re: inline functions James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-11-24 10:35 -0500
Re: inline functions Philip Lantz <prl@canterey.us> - 2012-11-24 22:56 -0800
Re: inline functions James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2012-11-25 01:18 -0800
csiph-web