Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: callback function |
| Date | 2012-10-25 10:01 +0000 |
| Organization | None |
| Message-ID | <aesgvlFk659U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <k5n77p$e5v$1@speranza.aioe.org> <ln6268k3fi.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> <k5pv1a$t1v$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
In article <k5pv1a$t1v$1@speranza.aioe.org>, Bill Cunningham <billcun@suddenlink.net> wrote: > Keith Thompson wrote: > > > You're posting code that you haven't even tried to compile? > > > > Please don't waste our time. > > Why do some people post untested code? I didn't know it was against the > rules. I've seen it alot. It's tested now and works perfectly. > Consider two scenarios: Person X posts untested code and asks for help with it. Person Y posts untested code in response to a question or request for help. Can you really not perceive a difference between these two situations, one that doesn't involve "in" and "out" groups? Aside, not just to you: I'm always amused by claims that code "works perfectly". "Works for all the tests I tried", okay, but -- oh well, I suppose I'm just a pessimist? It does seem like only relatively inexperienced programmers make such claims. -- B. L. Massingill ObDisclaimer: I don't speak for my employers; they return the favor.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-17 17:16 -0400
Re: callback function John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> - 2012-10-17 21:36 +0000
Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-17 17:44 -0400
Re: callback function John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> - 2012-10-17 21:51 +0000
Re: callback function Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-10-18 00:11 +0100
Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-18 18:37 -0400
Re: callback function Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-10-19 01:16 +0100
Re: callback function Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-10-20 06:48 -0700
Re: callback function Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-10-18 10:45 +1300
Re: callback function pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-10-19 14:49 -0400
Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-19 16:59 -0400
Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-19 17:04 -0400
Re: callback function Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2012-10-19 14:14 -0700
Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-19 17:31 -0400
Re: callback function Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-10-19 14:54 -0700
Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-19 18:42 -0400
Re: callback function James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-10-17 17:47 -0400
Re: callback function tom st denis <tom@iahu.ca> - 2012-10-19 04:44 -0700
Re: callback function James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-10-19 08:24 -0400
Re: callback function Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2012-10-17 14:39 -0700
Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-17 17:50 -0400
Re: callback function Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-10-18 11:00 +1300
Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-18 18:20 -0400
Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-18 18:24 -0400
Re: callback function Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2012-10-18 22:30 -0700
Re: callback function Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-10-20 11:58 +1300
Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-19 19:27 -0400
Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-19 19:43 -0400
Re: callback function Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2012-10-19 21:09 -0700
Re: callback function Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-10-20 06:53 -0700
Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-17 19:25 -0400
Re: callback function Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-10-18 13:34 +1300
Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-17 20:41 -0400
Re: callback function Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-10-18 14:37 +1300
Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-18 18:17 -0400
Re: callback function Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-10-20 11:54 +1300
Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-18 18:54 -0400
Re: callback function Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-10-19 01:23 +0100
Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-18 20:32 -0400
Re: callback function Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-10-19 02:43 +0100
Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-19 16:56 -0400
Re: callback function Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-10-19 22:10 +0100
Re: callback function Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2012-10-18 22:30 -0700
Re: callback function Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2012-10-19 12:37 -0400
Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-19 16:52 -0400
Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-19 18:44 -0400
Re: callback function Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2012-10-19 21:09 -0700
Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-20 15:01 -0400
Re: callback function Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-10-20 12:47 -0700
Re: callback function Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-10-20 14:51 -0500
Re: callback function Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2012-10-20 14:39 -0700
Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-20 19:06 -0400
Re: callback function Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2012-10-20 22:22 -0700
Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-21 14:35 -0400
Re: callback function Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2012-10-22 10:58 -0400
Re: callback function Bill Cunningham <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-24 17:28 -0700
Re: callback function Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-10-21 11:32 +1300
Re: callback function Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-10-20 15:51 -0700
Re: callback function Robert Miles <milesrf@Usenet-News.net> - 2012-11-25 22:39 -0600
Re: callback function Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-10-17 17:51 -0700
Re: callback function Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-10-18 20:34 +0300
Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-18 18:15 -0400
Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-18 18:27 -0400
Re: callback function Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-10-18 15:47 -0700
Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-18 18:52 -0400
Re: callback function blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> - 2012-10-25 10:01 +0000
Re: callback function Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2012-10-25 12:44 -0400
Re: callback function blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> - 2012-10-26 12:48 +0000
Re: callback function Robert Miles <milesrf@Usenet-News.net> - 2012-11-25 22:13 -0600
Re: callback function Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-11-26 03:42 -0800
Re: callback function James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-11-26 06:59 -0500
Re: callback function Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-11-26 23:03 -0800
csiph-web