Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| Subject | Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.theory |
| References | <JsCdncZ8o66CWVT_nZ2dnUU7_83NnZ2d@giganews.com> <tb8c0k$1g0gg$1@dont-email.me> <iuRBK.522488$ntj.518011@fx15.iad> <tb93om$1m432$1@dont-email.me> |
| From | Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> |
| Message-ID | <aF%BK.85974$Me2.71430@fx47.iad> (permalink) |
| Organization | Forte - www.forteinc.com |
| Date | 2022-07-20 18:50 -0400 |
On 7/20/22 10:33 AM, Mikko wrote:
> On 2022-07-20 11:16:26 +0000, Richard Damon said:
>
>> On 7/20/22 3:48 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>> On 2022-07-09 18:08:29 +0000, olcott said:
>>>
>>>> https://www.liarparadox.org/Sipser_165_167.pdf
>>>>
>>>> typedef void (*ptr)();
>>>>
>>>> // Sipser's diagonal argument
>>>> int D(ptr x)
>>>> {
>>>> if (H(x,x) == 0) // reject
>>>> return 1;
>>>> else // accept
>>>> return 0;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> int main()
>>>> {
>>>> Output("D(D) = ", D(D));
>>>> }
>>>
>>> Looks like this discussion has ended. The question has been answered:
>>> the above code is correct, although it would be clearer if it would
>>> output the value returned by H, too.
>>>
>>> In addition, the question whether one can infer from this code what
>>> Sipser inferred. A minority of participants were not convinced.
>>>
>>> Mikko
>
>> Well, the problem is that sometimes Olcott will expalin that H(D,D)
>> didn't get the wrong answer, even though it disagrees with what D(D)
>> did becuase H(D,D) doesn't refer to the ACTUAL D(D), since that's not
>> the input, but only refers to what H sees in its partial simulation of
>> the input.
>
>> In that case, D isn't definied right, as H calling H(D,D) isn't asing
>> thw question it needs to.
>
> It is well known that the if the domain of the halting problem is
> sufficiently restricted but the restrictions don't apply to the
> deciders then the restricted problem can be solved.
>
> Mikko
>
Right. Which is part of the flaw in his argument, as it shows that it
can't be made to apply to Turing Machines, as those aren't restricted
that way.
Back to comp.theory | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2022-07-09 13:08 -0500
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-07-09 14:41 -0400
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2022-07-09 14:26 -0500
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2022-07-09 13:45 -0600
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2022-07-09 14:51 -0500
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2022-07-09 14:03 -0600
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2022-07-09 15:44 -0500
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2022-07-09 15:03 -0600
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2022-07-09 16:05 -0500
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2022-07-09 15:12 -0600
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2022-07-09 16:20 -0500
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2022-07-09 15:34 -0600
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2022-07-09 16:41 -0500
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2022-07-09 15:51 -0600
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2022-07-09 17:05 -0500
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2022-07-09 16:24 -0600
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2022-07-09 16:44 -0500
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2022-07-09 16:33 -0500
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-07-09 16:11 -0400
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2022-07-09 14:14 -0600
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-07-09 16:26 -0400
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2022-07-09 22:50 +0100
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-07-10 00:04 +0100
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2022-07-09 18:36 -0500
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2022-07-09 17:49 -0600
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2022-07-09 19:08 -0500
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2022-07-09 19:04 -0600
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2022-07-09 20:41 -0500
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-07-09 21:56 -0400
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2022-07-09 20:04 -0600
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2022-07-09 21:21 -0500
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-07-09 22:50 -0400
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) "dklei...@gmail.com" <dkleinecke@gmail.com> - 2022-07-09 19:20 -0700
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2022-07-09 21:34 -0500
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2022-07-09 20:46 -0600
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2022-07-09 22:48 -0500
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-07-10 07:15 -0400
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-07-09 23:00 -0400
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-07-09 20:42 -0400
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2022-07-09 18:57 -0600
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-07-09 21:39 -0400
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2022-07-09 20:15 -0600
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2022-07-09 21:23 -0500
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2022-07-09 15:59 -0600
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-07-09 18:37 -0400
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2022-07-09 16:48 -0600
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-07-09 19:11 -0400
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2022-07-09 15:51 -0500
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-07-09 17:40 -0400
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) [wrong source code corrected] olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2022-07-09 15:54 -0500
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2022-07-09 14:57 -0500
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-07-10 15:26 +0300
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2022-07-10 08:34 -0500
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-07-10 17:30 -0400
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-07-12 16:09 +0300
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2022-07-12 08:13 -0500
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-07-12 19:03 -0400
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2022-07-13 07:45 -0500
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-07-13 16:47 +0300
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2022-07-13 09:49 -0500
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-07-13 18:47 -0400
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-07-13 18:43 -0400
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-07-20 10:48 +0300
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-07-20 07:16 -0400
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-07-20 17:33 +0300
Re: Did I encode Sipser correctly? (it seemed too easy) Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-07-20 18:50 -0400
csiph-web