Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.usenet.kooks > #719994
| From | dale <dale@dalekelly.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.usenet.kooks, alt.atheism, alt.talk.creationism, alt.freemasonry, free.control |
| Subject | the kooks strike back |
| Date | 2017-02-13 10:54 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <a3paca.kvb.19.1@news.alt.net> (permalink) |
Cross-posted to 5 groups.
What if kooks awarded the kook-cabal awards? First some definitions ... a kook is an individualist seeking affirmation in the anarcho-communistic nature of the cosmos, not a bad bloke, just working with a lesser hand and needs some guidance on how to use it a kook-cabaler is a kook who looks for a particular kind of affirmation, he is part of the peanut-gallery cabal, looking for atta-boys from the real cabal, hoping one day to become part of the real cabal the real cabal, would be the leading anarcho-commune if they stopped dispensing valuable peanuts to the most obvious kooks (the kook-cabal) this leaves the provider network admins in charge of a static usenet, and not the cabal, or not a user base growing the demand So what kind of kook-cabal awards could there be? how can the kooks prevent a kook-cabaler from getting a peanut? more definitions 1) the <snicker> award, showing their cards before getting a peanut 2) ad hominem award, wrong cards for a <snicker> 3) the REAL trolling award, leading a kook into a trolling battle while crossposted to alt.usenet.kooks until a kook loses his account, considering formality cards are a straight flush 4) the LESSER trolling award, trolling battle without crossposting to alt.usenet.kooks until a kook loses his account, less formality, less peanuts, considering the lack of formality cards are just a flush 5) etc., no formal straights, all flushes currently group space is not limited so the award/tracking process can occur in any place, but loss of peanuts should be reported to alt.usenet.kooks -- dale | http://www.dalekelly.org
Back to alt.usenet.kooks | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
the kooks strike back dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2017-02-13 10:54 -0500
Re: the kooks strike back "Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesgurlz@t-girls.com> - 2017-02-13 08:12 -0800
Re: the kooks strike back dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2017-02-13 12:43 -0500
csiph-web