Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #602054

Re: Schiaparelli Mars probe in paril!

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 22:00:28 -0500, Serigo wrote:

>On 10/20/2016 6:46 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> wrote:
>>> http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-37715202
>>>
>>> Actually the Martians are sick and tired of being spied upon and finally too action!
>>>
>>> Double-A
>>
>> Nope, it cratered in because soft landing stuff on Mars is difficult,
>> even for a 1,300 lb probe, yet there are those that beleive we
>> can soft land humans and hundreds of tons of equipment and supplies
>> in the near future.
>>
>> This is the tenth landing failure of 17 attempts to land something
>> on Mars or one of it's moons.
>>
>>
>
>Musk is stirring the Gov R&D money pot, which is funding his current 
>ventures, Ted Cruz just intro a bill in Congress for 16B Nasa to Mars 
>program
>
>  The president said the ultimate goal is to make it possible to one day 
>remain on Mars for an extended period of time.
>
>"Getting to Mars will require continued cooperation between government 
>and private innovators, and we're already well on our way. Within the 
>next two years, private companies will for the first time send 
>astronauts to the International Space Station," Obama wrote.
>
>He continued, "The next step is to reach beyond the bounds of Earth's 
>orbit. I'm excited to announce that we are working with our commercial 
>partners to build new habitats that can sustain and transport astronauts 
>on long-duration missions in deep space. These missions will teach us 
>how humans can live far from Earth -- something we'll need for the long 
>journey to Mars."
>
>http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/president-obama-declares-mission-mars/story?id=42723273
>
>and I disagree with Obama+Cruz, there is only rocks and sand there, we 
>have lots of unemployed on Earth, and can a lot of good things w 16B,

Interviews with people promoting moon missions in the 60s are telling.

Interviewer: Why should we spend $x to go to the moon?
Expert: It is in the nature of man to explore ... 

... and gets worse from there because they had *nothing*.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Schiaparelli Mars probe in paril! Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-10-20 14:01 -0700
  Re: Schiaparelli Mars probe in paril! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-20 23:46 +0000
    Re: Schiaparelli Mars probe in paril! Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-20 22:00 -0500
      Re: Schiaparelli Mars probe in paril! Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-10-21 14:00 -0700
        Re: Schiaparelli Mars probe in paril! Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-10-22 12:51 -0400
        Re: Schiaparelli Mars probe in paril! "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-10-23 12:39 -0700
          Re: Schiaparelli Mars probe in paril! Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-10-23 14:12 -0700
      Re: Schiaparelli Mars probe in paril! Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-10-22 12:38 -0400
        Re: Schiaparelli Mars probe in paril! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-22 16:51 +0000
          Re: Schiaparelli Mars probe in paril! Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-10-22 13:17 -0400
            Re: Schiaparelli Mars probe in paril! Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-22 12:39 -0500
              Re: Schiaparelli Mars probe in paril! Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-10-22 12:19 -0700
                Re: Schiaparelli Mars probe in paril! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-22 22:25 +0000

csiph-web