Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-09 00:32 -0800 |
| References | <a0d1d564-8497-4ffc-ac99-649d36901891@googlegroups.com> <30fc8e94-56a8-467e-9ed9-ab5e82cf731c@googlegroups.com> |
| Message-ID | <a3509d60-e8ed-4657-b0aa-af7b7cb2eda4@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? |
| From | fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> |
> foo.zz(3); one could ev rethink foo(2).zz(3) (not in this case but in general where you want to pass more args /though i not sure if this proper etc - analysing it should bring the answers but im probably to distracted to research it - got more important things to do this seems btw step down in paradigmates as if you will use it youre probably should stop talking abouf functions and talk about blocks of code and its managemant
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2016-12-08 20:57 -0800
Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? Sjouke Burry <burrynulnulfour@ppllaanneett.nnll> - 2016-12-09 07:28 +0100
Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-09 00:25 -0800
Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-09 00:32 -0800
Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-09 00:53 -0800
Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-12-09 13:11 +0000
Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-12-09 16:36 +0100
Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-12-09 16:00 +0000
Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-12-09 16:18 +0000
Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2016-12-09 11:25 -0500
Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2016-12-09 15:51 -0800
Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? "James R. Kuyper" <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2016-12-09 12:48 -0500
Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-12-09 18:16 +0000
Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2016-12-10 07:16 -0800
Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-12-10 16:58 +0100
Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2016-12-14 21:15 -0800
csiph-web