Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c > #98457

Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked?

Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Date 2016-12-09 00:32 -0800
References <a0d1d564-8497-4ffc-ac99-649d36901891@googlegroups.com> <30fc8e94-56a8-467e-9ed9-ab5e82cf731c@googlegroups.com>
Message-ID <a3509d60-e8ed-4657-b0aa-af7b7cb2eda4@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked?
From fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw


>   foo.zz(3);

one could ev rethink foo(2).zz(3) (not in this case but in general where you want to pass more args /though i not sure if this proper etc - analysing it should bring the answers but im probably to distracted to research it - got more important things to do
this seems btw step down in paradigmates as if you will use it youre probably should stop talking abouf functions and talk about blocks of code and its managemant

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2016-12-08 20:57 -0800
  Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? Sjouke Burry <burrynulnulfour@ppllaanneett.nnll> - 2016-12-09 07:28 +0100
  Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-09 00:25 -0800
    Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-09 00:32 -0800
    Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-09 00:53 -0800
  Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-12-09 13:11 +0000
    Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-12-09 16:36 +0100
      Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-12-09 16:00 +0000
      Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-12-09 16:18 +0000
  Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2016-12-09 11:25 -0500
    Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2016-12-09 15:51 -0800
  Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? "James R. Kuyper" <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2016-12-09 12:48 -0500
    Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-12-09 18:16 +0000
  Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2016-12-10 07:16 -0800
    Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-12-10 16:58 +0100
      Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2016-12-14 21:15 -0800

csiph-web