Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #375919

Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now?

Show all headers | View raw

On Tuesday, February 9, 2016 at 10:28:47 PM UTC-8, oriel36 wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 10, 2016 at 4:19:06 AM UTC, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Tuesday, February 9, 2016 at 3:03:39 PM UTC-8, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> > > On 2/9/2016 3:51 PM, oriel36 wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, February 9, 2016 at 8:46:12 PM UTC, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> > > >> On 2/9/2016 1:49 PM, oriel36 wrote:
> > > >>>    Run along now little empiricist and join the others who are full of meaningless stock phrases.
> > > >>
> > > >> Which "meaningless stock phrases" have got you complaining about "murder
> > > >> of the English language" and "take-my-word-for-it scams"?
> > > >> Be specific about a couple of stock phrases that you think are
> > > >> incomprehensible.
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
> > > >
> > > > I came away from this forum knowing that no one person was better or worse than the next and looks
> > > > like that hasn't changed in over two decades so you can draw some comfort from that.
> > 
> > Odd, you probably don't know much about Oriel36, but over on sci.astro.amateur he is well known as someone who is either a troll, unbelievably stupid, or mentally ill.
> > 
> > Oriel36 (Gerald Kelleher) is incapable of answering simple questions, especially those that only require a YES or a NO answer. To do so would eventually lead to the unraveling of his wispy and tenuous theories, which the rest of us already know are 100% inaccurate.
> > 
> > Oriel36 is all alone with his theories, he has not found a single professional who agrees with him. Because of this, he reasons that he must be superior to literally all of the great scientific minds of both the past and the present.
> > 
> > Even in the face of STRONG CONTRADICTORY EVIDENCE to his theories, Oriel36 will only regurgitate endless quotes of dead astronomers, which he doesn't actually understand or interpret correctly, as evidence for them.
> > 
> > Oriel36 is no astronomer, just as he is no climatologist, no anthropologist, no mathematician, or no geologist, but this does not stop him from spouting non-stop drivel, day after day.
> > 
> 
> 
> Look at you, the boy who can't manage to correlate the Sun appearing each day followed by the stars due to a rotation of the planet . I see you have found your level so I leave you to it.

That's not useful - 
where's the money.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? jamesl51165@gmail.com - 2016-02-06 15:55 -0800
  Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 16:15 -0800
    Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? jamesl51165@gmail.com - 2016-02-06 16:33 -0800
      Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 22:43 -0800
    Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? erkdemon@gmail.com - 2016-02-07 19:53 -0800
      Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 21:57 -0800
      Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 03:14 -0800
        Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 22:50 -0800
          Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 23:41 -0800
            Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 00:28 -0800
              Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 01:11 -0800
    Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 08:59 -0600
      Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? erkdemon@gmail.com - 2016-02-08 17:21 -0800
        Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? xxein1@att.net - 2016-02-11 15:06 -0800
          Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 20:02 -0800
            Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 20:10 -0800
              Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 23:55 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? jamesl51165@gmail.com - 2016-02-14 12:33 -0800
          Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? brightontoyandmodelmuseum@gmail.com - 2016-02-15 16:42 -0800
          Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-02-15 22:21 -0600
      Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-09 02:40 +0100
        Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 09:57 -0600
          Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 08:44 -0800
            Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 11:27 -0600
              Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 09:50 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 12:03 -0600
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 11:11 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 13:33 -0600
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 11:49 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-02-09 20:55 +0100
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 14:46 -0600
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 13:51 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 17:03 -0600
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-09 20:19 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 21:42 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 22:17 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 22:28 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 22:39 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-10 09:36 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 09:59 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-10 10:29 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 10:44 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 22:52 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 22:39 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 14:53 -0600
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 14:06 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 11:05 -0600
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 09:25 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 20:11 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 21:05 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 01:20 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-20 23:22 +0100
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? jamesl51165@gmail.com - 2016-02-20 14:42 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? brightontoyandmodelmuseum@gmail.com - 2016-02-26 15:26 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? erkdemon@gmail.com - 2016-02-26 15:32 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 19:29 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Eric Baird <erkdemon@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 21:14 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 21:51 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-02-09 19:04 +0100
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-09 10:30 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-02-09 19:31 +0100
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-09 10:38 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-02-09 20:57 +0100

csiph-web