Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.php > #5804
| From | "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.php |
| Subject | Re: const var, self:: or static:: |
| Date | 2012-05-02 17:25 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <a0d1vjF3qmU1@mid.uni-berlin.de> (permalink) |
| References | <a0ce19Fb48U1@mid.individual.net> |
Am 02.05.2012 11:45, schrieb Simon:
> If I have something like...
>
> //
> class MyClass
> {
> const MY_CONST = 10;
>
> ...
> }
> //
>
> Inside the class, is it 'better' to use self::MY_CONST or static::MY_CONST?
>
> I say 'better' because it works in both cases.
>
> Or is it just a personal choice.
It works with static:: but it is not documented. Maybe a PHP4 compatibility thing.
I would not use it. Documented are self::$var parent::$var and Classname::$var
/Str.
Back to comp.lang.php | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
const var, self:: or static:: Simon <bad@example.com> - 2012-05-02 11:45 +0200
Re: const var, self:: or static:: Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2012-05-02 07:13 -0400
Re: const var, self:: or static:: "M. Strobel" <sorry_no_mail_here@nowhere.dee> - 2012-05-02 17:25 +0200
Re: const var, self:: or static:: Michael Fesser <netizen@gmx.de> - 2012-05-02 19:55 +0200
csiph-web