Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c > #146348

Re: on gdb's sizeof versus gcc's sizeof

From scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal)
Subject Re: on gdb's sizeof versus gcc's sizeof
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
References <867e5vkgw2.fsf@example.com>
Message-ID <a03jF.4165$hU2.239@fx20.iad> (permalink)
Organization UsenetServer - www.usenetserver.com
Date 2019-09-26 13:26 +0000

Show all headers | View raw


Louis Valence <lvalence@example.com> writes:
>Can you explain this?  I don't get it.
>
>%cat sizeof-long.c
>#include <stdio.h>
>
>int main() {
>  printf("sizeof unsigned long: %ld\n", sizeof (unsigned long));
>  printf("sizeof long: %ld\n", sizeof (long));
>}
>
>%./sizeof-long
>sizeof unsigned long: 8
>sizeof long: 8
>
>%gdb
>GNU gdb (Ubuntu 8.0.1-0ubuntu1) 8.0.1
>
>[...]
>
>(gdb) p sizeof (unsigned long)
>$1 = 4

You may want to use a 64-bit build of GDB instead of the 32-bit:

(gdb) print sizeof(unsigned long)
$1 = 0x8
(gdb) quit

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

on gdb's sizeof versus gcc's sizeof Louis Valence <lvalence@example.com> - 2019-09-25 22:03 -0300
  Re: on gdb's sizeof versus gcc's sizeof Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2019-09-25 19:22 -0700
  Re: on gdb's sizeof versus gcc's sizeof scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2019-09-26 13:26 +0000
    Re: on gdb's sizeof versus gcc's sizeof Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2019-09-26 13:08 -0700
      Re: on gdb's sizeof versus gcc's sizeof Louis Valence <lvalence@example.com> - 2019-09-28 16:57 -0300

csiph-web