Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #318751

Re: A challenge for the "advocates"

Show all headers | View raw

On 09/02/15 14:54, Lloyd Parsons wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Sep 2015 13:49:06 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, September 2, 2015 at 1:20:32 PM UTC-6, Lloyd Parsons
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 02 Sep 2015 07:41:50 -0700, Snit wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 9/2/15, 7:36 AM, in article ms71du$g74$2@dont-email.me, "A.M"
>>>> <.m@nsn.s>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2015-09-02 8:49 AM, ronb wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 02 Sep 2015 08:20:43 +0000, vallor wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Of course, that's part of the guy's MO:  act in an offensive
>>>>>>> manner,
>>>>>>> then claim that he just wants to "talk about technology".  It's a
>>>>>>> "gag"
>>>>>>> that is so old that it pees rust, farts dust, and gives powdered
>>>>>>> milk.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I hate to say this, but as much as I like your (and Peter's) posts,
>>>>>> I'm about ready to put both of you in the killfile for a month. I'm
>>>>>> sick of reading "Snit's" constant horseshit, even second hand.
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh, the HUMANITY! How will Vallor the Hutt and Peter the Klöwn
>>>>> survive a month in your killfile?
>>>>>
>>>> Really comes down to I challenged the "advocates" to see if their
>>>> tool with so much "choice" could do a few tasks I find easy to do
>>>> elsewhere.
>>>>
>>>> And they ran off screaming and leaving insults in their wake.
>>>>
>>>> The only even close attempt has been from Owl who has to make system
>>>> wide scripts tied to system wide hot keys to even attempt to look
>>>> like he can do these things in a streamlined way.
>>>>
>>>> But then he leaves out the part of creating the script! He ignores
>>>> that the workflow he uses involves a *LOT* more than what he shows on
>>>> screen,
>>>> and that to do it he needs to use multiple VMs so he can avoid
>>>> getting his menus cluttered and having too many hot keys to remember.
>>>>
>>>> Still, he has shown himself to offer the best advocacy I have seen in
>>>> a long time.
>>>
>>>
>>> Bullshit, it mostly comes down to your excellent trolling skills and
>>> circular logic, aided by some of the advocates being literally owned by
>>> you.
>>
>>
>> LOL! No, dude. You have the circular logic part right but the trolling
>> skills part is backwards. Excellent trolling is when a troll writes one
>> post and gets many replies. Snit writes many posts and gets (relatively)
>> few in return... and many (most?) of those are *about* him. There's no
>> question that usenet is, for him, exactly what he said it is over a
>> decade ago, a distraction (a form of therapy, apparently) for his mental
>> issues with panic attacks and such. The poster, anna, in the
>> alt.support.anxiety-panic.moderated newsgroup once asked:
>
> Nope, he gets tons of replies, the content of those replies isn't of any
> importance as with trolling, the idea is to get fish on the line.  He
> does that consistently.
> Hell, he's got you running around behind him and has for lots of
> years...  :)
>
>
Plus he lives rent free in most of the advocates heads.


-- 
When told the reason for daylight savings time the Old
Indian said, "Only the government would believe that you
could cut a foot off the top of a blanket, sew it to the
bottom, and have a longer blanket."

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

A challenge for the "advocates" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-01 14:08 -0700
  Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-01 23:42 +0200
    Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 15:32 -0700
    Re: A challenge for the "advocates" vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-09-02 08:20 +0000
      Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-02 04:52 -0700
      Re: A challenge for the "advocates" ronb <ronbNOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 12:49 +0000
        Re: A challenge for the "advocates" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-02 08:04 -0500
        Re: A challenge for the "advocates" "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-02 10:36 -0400
          Re: A challenge for the "advocates" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-02 15:01 +0000
            Re: A challenge for the "advocates" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-02 15:29 +0000
              Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 08:48 -0700
          Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 13:49 -0700
            Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 17:38 -0700
            Re: A challenge for the "advocates" GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-02 21:58 -0600
        Re: A challenge for the "advocates" vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-09-02 19:41 +0000
          Re: A challenge for the "advocates" ronb <ronbNOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 23:41 +0000
      Re: A challenge for the "advocates" DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-03 09:27 -0400
  Snit!  Give it up, YOU degenerate. John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 14:43 -0700
    Re: Snit!  Give it up, YOU degenerate. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-09-01 23:55 +0000
      Re: Snit!  Give it up, YOU degenerate. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 18:44 -0700
  Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-01 14:57 -0700
    Re: A challenge for the "advocates" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-01 22:39 +0000
      Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-01 15:44 -0700
        Re: A challenge for the "advocates" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-01 23:10 +0000
      Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-01 15:52 -0700
  Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-01 18:02 -0700
    Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-02 08:13 +0200
      Re: Another Snit Circus attempt. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-02 04:50 -0700
  Re: A challenge for the "advocates" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-02 14:56 +0000
  Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-04 00:26 +0000
    Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-04 07:33 +0000
      Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-04 00:44 -0700
        Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-05 00:51 +0000
          Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-04 21:01 -0500
            Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-05 01:03 -0500
              Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-05 01:52 -0500
                Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-05 02:23 -0500
      Re: A challenge for the "advocates" JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-04 11:19 -0500
        Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-04 09:47 -0700
    Re: A challenge for the "advocates" JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-04 11:15 -0500
      Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-04 09:49 -0700
        Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-04 21:08 -0500
          Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-05 00:54 -0500
            Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-05 01:54 -0500
              Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-05 02:23 -0500
      Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-04 21:06 -0500
        Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-05 00:57 -0500
          Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-05 01:56 -0500
            Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-05 02:24 -0500

csiph-web