Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.astronomy > #276526

Re: 9/11 - The No Plane Theory - True or False?

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
news:mtnka7$n8t$1@pcls7.std.com...
> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>
>>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>news:mtnc9p$rko$1@pcls7.std.com...
>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>>
>>>>Believe Your Own Eyes - 9/11 - No "Planes" Were Ever Used.mp4
>>>>( Time indexed to start at 25:58 )
>>>> https://youtu.be/IL8cJWyOxWQ?t=25m58s
>>>
>>>Kòóktard, I just proved that clip had obviously been tampered with!
>
>>You did nothing of that sort.  What you would have to do is download the
>>exact same video that he shows he downloaded and I know you didn't do 
>>that.
>
> I did download the clip, kooktard.  I had to in order to get the right
> still frames.  As I said before, the normal speed video has low resolution
> double exposures of the jet in the stills, while the low speed videos
> somehow magically got higher resolution non-double exposures!!  How did
> that happen!!!  Sorry, kook, you guys were caught!
>
>>> And you go and post another link to it?  How kooktarded is that!
>
>>Not as kooktarded as someone who thinks heavy objects should not fall
>>straight down.  ( your words were "off-center" )  <G>
>
> The top of the building tipped to the side slightly before the collapse.
> Thus it was off-center.

But the top of the Twin towers was never found on the ground so how can you 
use the word "collapse" when all the top of the Twin Towers really did was 
get vaporized before it could reach the ground.  <G>

And those three parts of the exoskeleton that were blown free of the 
vaporization area and got stuck in the ground.  They couldn't be moved on 
the first try so they had to give up on them until later.  And to think a 
CGI could fly right through that exoskeleton and then the same exoskeleton 
got stick into the ground so hard Iron Workers could not move then on their 
first try.  <G>

>>> Do you really still believe that disproven, tampered clip?
>
>>You have just been a shit load of lies including that lie about 95% of
>>Flight 93 was found when the truth is 100% of Flight 93 was found where it
>>landed in Cleveland.  DUH.
>
> You are changing the subject, kook.  Do you still believe the discredited,
> tampered clip?

There is no doubt in my mind that clip was tampered with along with all the 
other videos of jets ramming into the Twin Towers that lacked any real crash 
dynamics.  Don't forget:

911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER6ZQUWvDFs


> Oh, BTW, it was Delta 1989 that landed in Cleveland that day, not Flight
> 93.  An air traffic controller heard the Flight 93 hijackers say things
> like "We have a bomb on board" and thought it was coming from Delta 1989
> so he reported Delta 1989 as hijacked.  The pilot said everything was fine
> when queried.  Delta 1989 was ordered to land at Cleveland.  It was held
> at gunpoint by the FBI and a SWAT team for a couple hours.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delta_Air_Lines_Flight_1989

And that news was probably provided by the same group that tried to tell us 
CGIs rammed the Twin Towers.  <G>

>>> Shall I now post still images from that clip online so that everyone 
>>> else
>>can laugh at your kooktarded ass?
>
>>And do not forget to notice that the wing disappears right before the CGI
>>enters the South Tower because to date only one person could recreate that
>>abnormally and he did it with 3D software and programmed the wing to 
>>reflect
>>the sky.  <G>
>
> It's not hard to erase a wing.  Even a kooktard can do it.

But why erase a wing in a bunch of videos when all anybody had to do was 
program their CGI to reflect the sky and that would do the exact same thing. 
DUH


> I'll take a look to see if you kooktards did erase a wing (there are still
> three left!) since I still have the download.  I'll post that, too.

whatever but you really should watch:

9-11 ON CLOCKS IN OVER A DOZEN MOVIES SINCE THE 60s !!! & Live Moment Planes 
Hit Towers
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BtNBgxS04Uc

Rocky 

Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

9/11 - The No Plane Theory - True or False? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 14:29 -0500
  Re: Rocky still a delusional kook jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 19:59 +0000
  Re: 9/11 - The No Plane Theory - True or False? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 17:43 -0500
    Re: 9/11 - The No Plane Theory - True or False? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 23:00 +0000
    Re: 9/11 - The No Plane Theory - True or False? "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-20 19:21 -0400
      Re: 9/11 - The No Plane Theory - True or False? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 18:39 -0500
        Re: Rocky continues to rave jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-21 00:02 +0000
    Re: 9/11 - The No Plane Theory - True or False? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 07:07 -0500
  Re: 9/11 - The No Plane Theory - True or False? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 11:11 -0500
    Re: 9/11 - The No Plane Theory - True or False? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 13:28 -0500
      Re: 9/11 - The No Plane Theory - True or False? Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-21 20:19 +0100
    Re: 9/11 - The No Plane Theory - True or False? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 16:16 -0500

csiph-web