Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.fan.rush-limbaugh > #3041802
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism, alt.politics.republicans, alt.politics.democrats.d, talk.politics.guns |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. |
| From | Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> |
| References | (7 earlier) <uqnu1lp46ipntnuqgr6i3isgpi94kagbg8@4ax.com> <XnsB4605408C4795629555@185.151.15.190> <udn32llqvglvb0uvd9sprcc3vf8e6r2fo5@4ax.com> <XnsB461D251D1F1D629555@185.151.15.190> <nn852ld6t5bg55as1m5ln18nm4m234msqt@4ax.com> |
| Organization | ViperNews - www.vipernews.com |
| Message-Id | <XnsB46253274EBCD629555@185.151.15.190> |
| Date | 2026-06-05 13:17 +0000 |
Cross-posted to 6 groups.
Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote in
news:nn852ld6t5bg55as1m5ln18nm4m234msqt@4ax.com:
> On Fri, 05 Jun 2026 01:47:27 +0000, Mitchell Holman
> <noemail@aol.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
> <XnsB461D251D1F1D629555@185.151.15.190> wrote:
>
>>Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote in
>>news:udn32llqvglvb0uvd9sprcc3vf8e6r2fo5@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Wed, 03 Jun 2026 13:22:34 +0000, Mitchell Holman
>>> <noemail@aol.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
>>> <XnsB4605408C4795629555@185.151.15.190> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote in
>>>>news:uqnu1lp46ipntnuqgr6i3isgpi94kagbg8@4ax.com:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 31 May 2026 18:07:19 +0000, Mitchell Holman
>>>>> <noemail@aol.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
>>>>> <XnsB45D845A9EBC0629555@185.151.15.190> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote in
>>>>>>news:27io1lpn25tp6d3cu2vqlf2843tl2sotil@4ax.com:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, 29 May 2026 02:08:28 +0000, Mitchell Holman
>>>>>>> <noemail@aol.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
>>>>>>> <XnsB45AD5F92E0A5629555@185.151.15.190> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In these examples there were no state laws to conflict with
>>>>>>>>> federal law.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The above just illustrate that the Confederacy was
>>>>>>>>about defending slavery, they didn't care whit about
>>>>>>>>"states rights"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just exactly how was the North going to end slavery?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As shown by the portion you snipped,
>>>>>>at the time the South seceded the North
>>>>>>wasn't TRYING to end slavery. In fact
>>>>>>Lincoln offered to PRESERVE slavery in
>>>>>>the states that already had it.
>>>>>
>>>>> If that is true why was the CSA even formed?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Confederates wanted to EXPAND slavery,
>>>>Lincoln was opposed to that. And they
>>>>seceded without even trying to negotiate
>>>>the issue.
>>>
>>> Expand it where?
>>
>>
>> From the Confederate Constitution:
>>
>>
>>"The Confederate States may acquire new territory;
>>and Congress shall have power to legislate and
>>provide governments for the inhabitants of all
>>territory belonging to the Confederate States.
>>In all such territory the institution of negro
>>slavery, as it now exists in the Confederate
>>States, shall be recognized and protected"
>>Art IV, Sec 3, CSA Constitution
>
> The North at the time was advocating all new territory be
> fee of slaves.
But had pass no laws regarding that.
> The CSA was simply stating their position on
> the matter. You seem to have a problem in understanding
> conditions before and after succession.
The South started the over a demand
to expand slavery. Not "states rights",
not "Southern way of life", not "defense
of property"
>
> The Confederate Constitution went into effect AFTER
> succession, not before.
Did you notice the CSA denial of
popular sovereignty? New territories
MUST have legal slavery even if the
locals don't want it. So much for
"states rights"
>
> AI Overview
>
> Historical Context and Documents Provisional Constitution:
> Before the permanent constitution, delegates from the
> seceding states adopted a Provisional Constitution on
> February 8, 1861, in Montgomery, Alabama, to serve as a
> temporary framework.Superseded: The permanent constitution
> went into effect on February 22, 1862.
>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> State objections were not allowed.
>>>>>>>>>>The CSA Constitution mandated legal slavery
>>>>>>>>>>regardless of local opinion.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That was the way the CSA system was constructed. It did not
>>>>>>>>> exist when the states left the union. At that point it was
>>>>>>>>> state power vs federal power.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Exactly. The CSA was about slavery,
>>>>>>>>not state's rights.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You are saying the only thing the CSA was concerned about
>>>>>>> was slavery?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A sampling of the Declaration of
>>>>>>Secession documents:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Mississippi: "Our position is thoroughly
>>>>>>identified with the institution of slavery"
>>>>>
>>>>> The issue ws slavery but it rested upon the law, which the
>>>>> states felt should hold state law as paramount.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The Supremecy Clause is in the Constitution.
>>>>Which Southerners loved when it came to forcing
>>>>states to return runaway slaves to their owners.
>>>
>>> There was nothing in Northern law that said differently.
>>> Stolen property was returned to the owner. Do you have a
>>> problem with that?
>>>
>>
>> Funny how slaves were both property
>>AND people ("3/5ths of a person") when
>>it came to congressional representation.
>
> That was a legal fiction used to help ratify the
> Constitution.
>
>>And when a slave fled to Canada or Mexico
>>how did they suddenly become a person?
>
> The laws of the country governed. US law is not valid in
> Canada or Mexico today just as their laws are not valid in
> the US.
The South claims property becomes a
person according to locals laws. Just as
pro-lifers claim a zygote is a person
and not a person accurding to local laws.
>>>>>>Georgia: "For the last ten years we have
>>>>>>had numerous and serious causes of complaint
>>>>>>against our non-slave-holding confederate
>>>>>>States with reference to the subject of
>>>>>>African slavery."
>>>>>>
>>>>>>South Carolina: "an increasing hostility
>>>>>>on the part of the non-slaveholding States
>>>>>>to the institution of slavery."
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Texas: "maintaining and protecting the
>>>>>>institution known as negro slavery -- the
>>>>>>servitude of the African to the white race."
>>>>>>
>>>>>>https://www.civilwar.org/learn/primary-sources/declaration-causes-
>>>>>>seceding-states
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Lincoln offered to PRESERVE SLAVERY.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Buchanan offered to PRESERVE SLAVERY.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Who was trying to "end slavery"?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The Republican Party and their platform. Especially in any
>>>>>>>>> new states.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Show us what the 1860 GOP platform
>>>>>>>>says about slavery.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Look it up yourself.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There were no abolition bills
>>>>>>>>>>in Congress at the time.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Because the new Congress had not been sworn in. Nor had
>>>>>>>>> Lincoln.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Exactly. The Slavery States didn't
>>>>>>>>want to even negotiate the issue.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There was nothing to negotiate. The South would not accept
>>>>>>> all new states being slave free and the North would accept
>>>>>>> nothing else.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Where did "the Horth" say that at the
>>>>>>time of secession?
>>>>>
>>>>> Secession occurred because the South expected what the North
>>>>> eventually did.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> They seceded to expand slavery. Not
>>>>because of any "state's rights".
>>>
>>> Expand where?
>>>
>>
>> All new territories and states.
>
> They wanted slavery to be legal just as the Union wanted it
> to be illegal. Remember we are talking about a country
> separate from the US and who had it's own laws.
>
Actually "the North" had advocated
popular sovereignty on the issue, as was
the case with the Kansas Nebrska Act. But
the South rejected even that.
>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> To prevent living under the laws against slavery.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So you admit secession was about slavery.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Not "states rights".
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Well, that's a start.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The basic issue was whether or not a state could pass laws
>>>>>>>>> that were in conflict with federal law and prevent federal
>>>>>>>>> law from being enforced in the state. The particular issue
>>>>>>>>> were laws involving slavery.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Did any states secede over the federal
>>>>>>>>Slave Fugitive Acts? Many northern states
>>>>>>>>hate them but didn't not attack the government
>>>>>>>>over this submission to southern state demands.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The South felt those laws did not apply to them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Prisons are full of people who felt the
>>>>>>law didn't apply to them. Is that a legal
>>>>>>justification for violating it?
>>>>>
>>>>> Persons are not organized and recognized states.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You don't get to pick and choose what laws
>>>>apply to you.
>>>
>>> The Southern States felt their laws should come first.
>>
>>
>> That is unconstitutional per the
>>Supremecy Clause.
>
> Which is why they left the Union and formed the CSA. Nothing
> in the Constitution prevented this.
>
So the South was both for states
rights (their own) and against state's
rights (any new state voting against
slavery).
>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Did the individual states have the power to negate federal
>>>>>>>>> law by passing conflicting state law? The Union said no.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The Supremecy Clause of the Constituion said no.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The states said yes.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Secession is unconstitutional.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Only by Court interpretation, made after the Civil War.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is nothing in the Constution
>>>>>>that allows for secession.
>>>>>
>>>>> There is nothing to prevent it either.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Fact.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/74/700/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for supporting what I said. In 1862 there was no
>>>>>>> legal mechanism for leaving the union or to prevent states
>>>>>>> from leaving the union. That was only decided on the
>>>>>>> battlefield.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That battlefield being Ft Sumter.
>>>
>>> A part of South Carolina.
>>
>>
>>Nope. SoutH Carolina sold Ft Sumter
>>to the US in the 1820's.
>>
>>
>>"Resolved, That this state do cede to the United
>>States, all the right, title and claim of South
>>Carolina to the site of Fort Sumter and the
>>requisite quantity of adjacent territory, Provided,
>>That all processes, civil and criminal issued under
>>the authority of this State, or any officer thereof,
>>shall and may be served and executed upon the same,
>>and any person there being who may be implicated by
>>law; and that the said land, site and structures
>>enumerated, shall be forever exempt from liability
>>to pay any tax to this state. Also resolved: That the
>>State shall extinguish the claim, if any valid claim
>>there be, of any individuals under the authority of
>>this State, to the land hereby ceded."
>>https://tinyurl.com/y8v6g4kb
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Confederacy attacked America,
>>>>>>why should we "honor" that with statues?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> That is a modern viewpoint. At the time it was the Union
>>>>> and the CSA. The Union considered the states as still part
>>>>> of the union. The CSA did not.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> States do not get to "consider" what laws
>>>>they will obey.
>>>>
>>>
>>> That was not the issue. The South considered their laws
>>> should apply when Federal laws were different. Congress had
>>> no right to pass laws that conflicted with State laws.
>>>
>>
>> 1) What laws? Congress passed no laws
>>limiting slavery before the South seceded.
>
> The election of 1860 had the issue of slavery as a major par
> of the campaign and the Republican Party had stated they
> would make slavery illegal.
Lincoln only won 39% of the vote, his
opinions were hardly the force of law.
>
>>
>> 2) And even if they did the Supremecy
>>Clause required the states to obey them.
>>
>>
>
> The South disagreed. So the states involved left and formed
> their own country.
The Southern states didn't have a
problem with the Constitution when they
voted to ratify it in 1789.
Back to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2026-05-25 02:20 +0000
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2026-05-26 15:38 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2026-05-27 18:31 +0000
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Skeeter <invalid@none.com> - 2026-05-27 13:58 -0600
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. AlleyCat <al@aohello.con> - 2026-05-29 13:54 -0700
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Skeeter <invalid@none.com> - 2026-05-29 16:46 -0600
Re: The parties switched on race. Everyone knows it. AlleyCat <al@aohello.con> - 2026-05-29 16:57 -0700
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2026-05-28 14:27 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2026-05-29 02:08 +0000
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.corn> - 2026-05-29 13:53 -0700
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Skeeter <invalid@none.com> - 2026-05-29 16:04 -0600
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. AlleyCat <al@aohello.con> - 2026-05-29 16:52 -0700
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Skeeter <invalid@none.com> - 2026-05-29 18:21 -0600
Re: The parties switched on race. Everyone knows it. AlleyCat <al@aohello.con> - 2026-05-29 19:30 -0700
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2026-05-31 10:58 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2026-05-31 18:07 +0000
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2026-06-02 19:02 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2026-06-03 13:22 +0000
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2026-06-04 16:29 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2026-06-05 01:47 +0000
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2026-06-05 06:37 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2026-06-05 13:17 +0000
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2026-06-05 18:28 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2026-06-06 14:23 +0000
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2026-06-07 01:10 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2026-06-08 13:52 +0000
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2026-06-09 07:56 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2026-06-12 02:39 +0000
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2026-06-12 06:02 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2026-06-14 14:20 +0000
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2026-06-14 15:55 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2026-06-17 14:00 +0000
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2026-06-17 10:33 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2026-06-19 14:36 +0000
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2026-06-20 01:25 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2026-06-20 09:42 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2026-06-20 14:26 +0000
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2026-06-20 15:33 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2026-06-20 23:23 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2026-06-21 14:08 +0000
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2026-06-21 18:48 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2026-06-20 23:21 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2026-06-21 14:16 +0000
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Skeeter <invalid@none.com> - 2026-06-21 08:49 -0600
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2026-06-22 02:01 +0000
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Skeeter <invalid@none.com> - 2026-06-21 20:24 -0600
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2026-06-22 06:46 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2026-06-22 10:28 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Skeeter <invalid@none.com> - 2026-06-22 10:09 -0600
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2026-06-23 02:32 +0000
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Samuel Spade <sam@spade.invalid> - 2026-06-22 22:45 -0700
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2026-06-23 06:38 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Samuel Spade <sam@spade.invalid> - 2026-06-23 20:10 -0700
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2026-06-24 06:43 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Samuel Spade <sam@spade.invalid> - 2026-06-25 22:53 -0700
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2026-06-26 05:10 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2026-06-26 13:45 +0000
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2026-06-26 09:54 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2026-06-27 14:19 +0000
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2026-06-27 11:38 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2026-06-28 02:26 +0000
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2026-06-28 08:15 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2026-06-27 08:39 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2026-06-23 06:32 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2026-06-23 13:37 +0000
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Skeeter <invalid@none.com> - 2026-06-23 09:46 -0600
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2026-06-23 18:56 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2026-06-24 13:43 +0000
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2026-06-24 10:24 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2026-06-24 17:56 +0000
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2026-06-24 14:48 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2026-06-25 13:58 +0000
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2026-06-25 11:07 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2026-06-26 13:27 +0000
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2026-06-26 10:05 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2026-06-28 02:38 +0000
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2026-06-28 08:36 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2026-06-28 13:54 +0000
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2026-06-28 18:28 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2026-06-30 02:29 +0000
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2026-06-30 04:56 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2026-06-30 13:23 +0000
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2026-06-30 10:25 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2026-07-01 13:47 +0000
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2026-07-01 10:41 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Skeeter <invalid@none.com> - 2026-07-01 06:47 -0600
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2026-07-01 10:49 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Skeeter <invalid@none.com> - 2026-06-24 23:47 -0600
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2026-06-24 12:33 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2026-06-24 17:57 +0000
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2026-06-24 14:50 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2026-06-25 01:45 +0000
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2026-06-25 02:44 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2026-06-25 11:59 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Skeeter <invalid@none.com> - 2026-06-24 23:45 -0600
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Skeeter <invalid@none.com> - 2026-06-24 11:09 -0600
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2026-06-24 18:00 +0000
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Skeeter <invalid@none.com> - 2026-06-24 23:46 -0600
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2026-06-21 19:01 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2026-06-18 18:15 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2026-06-19 02:22 +0000
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2026-06-19 05:41 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2026-06-19 09:53 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2026-06-19 18:14 +0000
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2026-06-20 01:30 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2026-06-20 10:43 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Skeeter <invalid@none.com> - 2026-06-20 09:20 -0600
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2026-06-21 13:59 +0000
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Skeeter <invalid@none.com> - 2026-06-21 08:35 -0600
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2026-06-21 19:09 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Skeeter <invalid@none.com> - 2026-06-21 17:16 -0600
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2026-06-22 06:51 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2026-06-23 02:23 +0000
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2026-06-23 06:43 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2026-06-23 18:34 +0000
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2026-06-23 19:04 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Skeeter <invalid@none.com> - 2026-06-23 09:44 -0600
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2026-06-23 02:16 +0000
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2026-06-23 06:58 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2026-06-24 13:26 +0000
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2026-06-24 10:32 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2026-06-26 13:38 +0000
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2026-06-26 10:09 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Skeeter <invalid@none.com> - 2026-06-26 09:21 -0600
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Skeeter <invalid@none.com> - 2026-06-24 11:08 -0600
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Skeeter <invalid@none.com> - 2026-06-23 09:43 -0600
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Attila <prochoice@here.now> - 2026-06-23 19:12 -0400
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Alan Bond <bondrock@ifx.net> - 2026-06-19 09:01 -0700
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Amal Bond <ab@ifx.net> - 2026-06-20 02:11 +0000
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Alan Bond <bondrock@ifx.net> - 2026-06-18 20:30 -0700
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2026-06-20 02:07 +0000
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Skeeter <invalid@none.com> - 2026-06-19 22:34 -0600
Re: The parties never switched on race. Everyone knows it. Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2026-05-29 02:29 -0400
csiph-web