Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.php > #9613

Re: testing for source to use

Show all headers | View raw

richard <noreply@example.com> wrote in news:1f2h8l3xg19eu$.qdytiuo8qvql$.dlg@
40tude.net:

> On Fri, 24 May 2013 13:10:58 +0000 (UTC), Doug Miller wrote:
> 
>> Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> wrote in news:timstreater-
B96075.12530724052013
>> @news.individual.net:
>> 
>>> Fuckin' Ada, richard, how about *learning* some shit before posting 
>>> dopey questions, eh? How about looking through your code for simple 
>>> errors and, like, *fixing* them before posting here, eh?
>> 
>> You don't understand who you're dealing with here. This may help:
>> 
>> https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!search/richard$20the$20stoopid
>> https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!search/richard$20the$20sto0pid
> 
> Bringing up ancient history is not good for YOU.
> That moniker was given to me by a guy who simply edited an email I had sent
> him, which he posted.

And with good reason, too.

> The good boys of AUK took it and made it their signature.

And with good reason, too.

> It's been politcally correct over the years to harass me for anything I
> say, even though someone else who says the same damn thing, gets applauded.

No, Richard, you don't get harassed "for anything [you] say". This is what you get 
"harassed" for:
- asking the same questions, over and over
- not listening to the answers...
- ... or worse, *arguing* with the answers
- criticizing people who are trying to help you
- never even considering that the problems you have are the direct result of _your own_ 
repeated failures to learn from experience
> [...]

> So I'm stupid huh?
> Then how come my IQ is routinely tested at 125?

Is that all?

Seriously. That's really not especially high. I certainly wouldn't go around bragging about a 
125 IQ.
> 
> Now let's see how smart you are.
> You have a set of equal squares lined up in a 3x3 pattern.

You mean like this?
http://math.about.com/od/weeklyproblem/ss/howmanysq.htm

> How many boxes do you see?
> 86% of the people get the answer wrong.
> 
> Brought to you by the "Lord of the Bull!".

Evidently, I'm enough smarter than you to see that your question is ambiguous: does 
"boxes" mean squares? or rectangles? or *any* enclosed figures?

Back to comp.lang.php | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

testing for source to use richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-05-23 23:23 -0400
  Re: testing for source to use "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-05-24 03:36 +0000
  Re: testing for source to use JohnT <john@example.com> - 2013-05-24 10:17 +0000
  Re: testing for source to use Doug Miller <doug_at_milmac_dot_com@example.com> - 2013-05-24 10:50 +0000
    Re: testing for source to use Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-05-24 12:53 +0100
      Re: testing for source to use The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2013-05-24 13:23 +0100
      Re: testing for source to use Doug Miller <doug_at_milmac_dot_com@example.com> - 2013-05-24 13:10 +0000
        Re: testing for source to use richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-05-24 15:10 -0400
          Re: testing for source to use Doug Miller <doug_at_milmac_dot_com@example.com> - 2013-05-24 21:41 +0000
  Re: testing for source to use Scott Johnson <noonehome@chalupasworld.com> - 2013-05-24 05:38 -0700
    Re: testing for source to use richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-05-24 15:22 -0400
      Re: testing for source to use Scott Johnson <noonehome@chalupasworld.com> - 2013-05-24 15:12 -0700

csiph-web