Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #540836
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, rec.arts.sf.science, sci.astro |
| Subject | Re: Attempt at a return to launch site landing by SpaceX. |
| References | <n59h0i$47r$2@dont-email.me> <n5agho$h0h$1@dont-email.me> <V1aey.26993$Gc6.11018@fx08.iad> <ddspluFb01jU2@mid.individual.net> |
| Message-ID | <Vsgey.41152$Hz3.39543@fx43.iad> (permalink) |
| Organization | TeraNews.com |
| Date | 2015-12-22 13:17 -0500 |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 12/22/2015 06:15 AM, Sylvia Else wrote:
> On 22/12/2015 9:59 PM, benj wrote:
>> On 12/21/2015 10:37 PM, Rick Pikul/Chakat Firepaw wrote:
>>> On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 13:42:02 -0500, Robert Clark wrote:
>>>
>>>> Launch with an attempt at a return-to-launch-site landing pushed
>>>> back to
>>>> today, Monday evening:
>>>
>>> An update, since no one seems to have posted it, (in ras.science at
>>> least):
>>>
>>> The landing was successful and the crowd at SpaceX went nuts.
>>
>> This is a HUGE advance for science!
>
> Huh?
>
> This is engineering, not science.
>
> Clearly, it's good engineering. But it's still not science.
>
> Sylvia.
>
Nah. Blowing things up real good is engineering! Getting a rocket to
land on it's butt like a 50's sci fi movies is science! The term is
"science fiction", not "engineering fiction", right?
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Attempt at a return to launch site landing by SpaceX. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2015-12-21 13:42 -0500
Re: Attempt at a return to launch site landing by SpaceX. Rick Pikul/Chakat Firepaw <chakatfirepaw@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 03:37 +0000
Re: Attempt at a return to launch site landing by SpaceX. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-12-21 21:48 -0700
Re: Attempt at a return to launch site landing by SpaceX. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-12-22 16:20 +1100
Re: Attempt at a return to launch site landing by SpaceX. jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-12-22 15:08 +0000
Re: Attempt at a return to launch site landing by SpaceX. Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> - 2015-12-22 16:38 +0000
Re: Attempt at a return to launch site landing by SpaceX. Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 09:35 -0700
Re: Attempt at a return to launch site landing by SpaceX. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 05:59 -0500
Re: Attempt at a return to launch site landing by SpaceX. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-12-22 22:15 +1100
Re: Attempt at a return to launch site landing by SpaceX. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 13:17 -0500
Re: Attempt at a return to launch site landing by SpaceX. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 13:31 -0800
csiph-web