Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #696132
| Subject | Re: Alternatives To Linux |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| References | (7 earlier) <108ivni$3ojlv$1@dont-email.me> <zX7rQ.52379$GnW4.28610@fx35.iad> <108j3r9$3p9li$1@dont-email.me> <vUirQ.407672$l%O3.261794@fx18.iad> <108olso$13cdr$4@dont-email.me> |
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
| Message-ID | <OfYrQ.173151$P2c3.14675@fx12.iad> (permalink) |
| Organization | usenet-news.net |
| Date | 2025-08-28 08:49 -0400 |
On 2025-08-28 12:28 a.m., Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: > On Tue, 26 Aug 2025 09:46:03 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: > >> On 2025-08-25 9:49 p.m., Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: >>> >>> So not ready for prime time, then? >> >> Actually, the project is forked so I imagine that most of it is >> functional. As it is, it is simply a bug-fixed version of the X11 >> project. Nevertheless, other applications that call on X might not work >> as expected. > > I thought it was supposed to be a seamless replacement for the existing > Xorg. What are they changing to break backward compatibility? I don't know because I haven't looked into it. It's a complaint made by people on Reddit who reject XLibre altogether. I took them at their word, but I am quite aware of how often Linux zealots lie, especially the homosexual allies. >>>> On the Linux side, the fascists controlling the many distributions are >>>> doing everything they can to blacklist it. >>> >>> How do you “blacklist” Free software? >> >> You tell me: > > No, you were the one who claimed such a concept existed. *You* tell *us*. I posted a link. It was self-explanatory. I notice that you snipped that. However, let's make it simple. XLibre is available as a fork for anyone who wants to continue using X but wants it to get updates and fixes. Distributions who pride themselves on giving the user choice decided not only that they wouldn't carry the project, but the X11 project prohibited the developer who started the project from working on it. Additionally, as a result of Biden's executive order against rogue nations having access to American software, Russian developers and their contributions were blacklisted from Linux. -- God be with you, CrudeSausage Islam is the enemy John 14:6
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Alternatives To Linux Lester Thorpe <lt@gnu.rocks> - 2025-08-24 11:51 +0000
Re: Alternatives To Linux "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-08-24 08:10 -0400
Re: Alternatives To Linux Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-24 22:04 +0000
Re: Alternatives To Linux "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-08-24 18:24 -0400
Re: Alternatives To Linux rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-25 01:18 +0000
Re: Alternatives To Linux Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-08-24 13:04 +0000
Re: Alternatives To Linux Lester Thorpe <lt@gnu.rocks> - 2025-08-24 13:53 +0000
Re: Alternatives To Linux Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-08-24 15:46 +0000
Re: Alternatives To Linux Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-08-24 19:29 +0000
Re: Alternatives To Linux CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-25 08:47 -0400
Re: Alternatives To Linux Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-25 21:50 +0000
Re: Alternatives To Linux CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-25 18:09 -0400
Re: Alternatives To Linux Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-26 00:39 +0000
Re: Alternatives To Linux CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-25 21:18 -0400
Re: Alternatives To Linux Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-26 01:49 +0000
Re: Alternatives To Linux CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-26 09:46 -0400
Re: Alternatives To Linux Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-28 04:28 +0000
Re: Alternatives To Linux CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-28 08:49 -0400
Re: Alternatives To Linux Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-01 02:56 +0000
Re: Alternatives To Linux CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-09-01 08:51 -0400
Re: Alternatives To Linux Borax Man <boraxman@geidiprime.invalid> - 2025-09-04 10:54 +0000
Re: Alternatives To Linux CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-09-04 11:19 -0400
Re: Alternatives To Linux Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-05 00:17 +0000
Re: Alternatives To Linux CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-09-04 21:31 -0400
Re: Alternatives To Linux RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-26 07:31 +0000
Re: Alternatives To Linux CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-26 09:53 -0400
Re: Alternatives To Linux rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-26 19:12 +0000
Re: Alternatives To Linux RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-27 06:30 +0000
Re: Alternatives To Linux CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-27 09:05 -0400
Re: Alternatives To Linux rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-27 19:59 +0000
Re: Alternatives To Linux Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-24 22:07 +0000
Re: Alternatives To Linux Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-08-30 08:59 +0000
Re: Alternatives To Linux Woozy Song <suzyw0ng@outlook.com> - 2025-08-27 11:42 +0800
Re: Alternatives To Linux Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-27 07:23 +0000
Re: Alternatives To Linux rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-27 19:55 +0000
csiph-web