Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1279733
| From | Edgar Bonet <linux@edgar-bonet.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist |
| Subject | Bug#1126349: ld segfaults if called with "-r -b binary -z noexecstack" |
| Date | 2026-01-25 15:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <Mh8OJ-deAk-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <MgOdj-d0LL-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <Mh7fX-ddJb-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <Mh8F3-dewa-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <MgOdj-d0LL-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <Mh8F3-dewa-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 2026-01-25, Matthias Klose wrote: > a test case showing the regression would be more useful. I do not quite understand. This test case succeeds on 2.45.50.20251209-1 (as shipped in testing) and fails with a segfault on 2.45.50.20260119-1 (found in sid). Isn't that a test case showing the regression?
Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#1126349: ld segfaults if called with "-r -b binary -z noexecstack" Edgar Bonet <linux@edgar-bonet.org> - 2026-01-24 17:00 +0100
Bug#1126349: ld segfaults if called with "-r -b binary -z noexecstack" Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2026-01-25 03:30 +0100
Bug#1126349: ld segfaults if called with "-r -b binary -z noexecstack" Edgar Bonet <linux@edgar-bonet.org> - 2026-01-25 13:20 +0100
Bug#1126349: ld segfaults if called with "-r -b binary -z noexecstack" Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2026-01-25 14:50 +0100
Bug#1126349: ld segfaults if called with "-r -b binary -z noexecstack" Edgar Bonet <linux@edgar-bonet.org> - 2026-01-25 15:00 +0100
Bug#1126349: ld segfaults if called with "-r -b binary -z noexecstack" Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2026-01-25 15:10 +0100
Bug#1126349: ld segfaults if called with "-r -b binary -z noexecstack" Edgar Bonet <linux@edgar-bonet.org> - 2026-01-25 17:00 +0100
csiph-web