Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #210557
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.checkmate |
| Subject | Re: Two articles on the danger KavaNOWAY represents *already*, even before his possible confirmation. |
| Date | 2018-10-03 08:36 -0600 |
| Organization | FNVW |
| Message-ID | <MPG.361e81bc8d95d76f989db1@reader.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | <pp1f4c$1of$24@dont-email.me> <MPG.361e7d54b8130a6a989da2@reader.albasani.net> <pp2jit$14p7$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
In article <pp2jit$14p7$1@gioia.aioe.org>, melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... > > On 10/3/2018 10:17 AM, Skeeter wrote: > > In article <pp1f4c$1of$24@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > > says... > >> > >> The ugly nature of KavaNOOOOO!'s (and the Cheeto Benito's) supporters: > >> > >> https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2018/10/02/who-supports- > >> kavanaugh-after-last-weeks-angry-hearings-our-research-helps-explain/? > >> utm_term=.90bd54bc32db > >> > >> Trouble brewing: > >> > >> https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2018/09/27/the-way- > >> kavanaughs-supporters-are-talking-about-sexual-assault-allegations-can-be- > >> dangerous-our-new-study-finds/ > >> > >> Expect the more virulent hostile sexists here to froth up a storm in 3, 2, > >> 1 ... > > > > washingtonpost.....to damn funny > > Faux is funnier, if you think about it, and more people watch Faux Nooz > than Washington Post Nooz because the Faux chicks have very nice racks > where they keep their spelling bee and history remembering awards. Don't you have some greeting card crap to write?
Back to alt.checkmate | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Two articles on the danger KavaNOWAY represents *already*, even before his possible confirmation. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-03 04:04 +0000
Re: Two articles on the danger KavaNOWAY represents *already*, even before his possible confirmation. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-10-02 21:11 -0700
Re: Two articles on the danger KavaNOWAY represents *already*, even before his possible confirmation. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:17 -0600
Re: Two articles on the danger KavaNOWAY represents *already*, even before his possible confirmation. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-03 10:26 -0400
Re: Two articles on the danger KavaNOWAY represents *already*, even before his possible confirmation. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:36 -0600
Re: Two articles on the danger KavaNOWAY represents *already*, even before his possible confirmation. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-03 10:46 -0400
Re: Two articles on the danger KavaNOWAY represents *already*, even before his possible confirmation. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:54 -0600
csiph-web