Re: Was she looking for love ?

From	Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups	alt.checkmate
Subject	Re: Was she looking for love ?
Date	2018-10-03 07:59 -0600
Organization	FNVW
Message-ID	<MPG.361e791254262b73989d96@reader.albasani.net> (permalink)
References	(10 earlier) <pp0r3c$1of$14@dont-email.me> <72s7rd9btunmrv8aikj77nt9h8n8u9p26l@4ax.com> <pp13u6$1of$19@dont-email.me> <pp1boh$vji$1@dont-email.me> <pp1fhr$1of$25@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

In article <pp1fhr$1of$25@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid 
says...
> 
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 20:06:55 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> 
> > On 10/2/2018 5:53 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> >> melt! On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 18:28:11 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq.
> >> wrote:
> >> 
> >>> On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 22:22:36 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> >>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> >>>> On Tue, 02 Oct 2018, Checkmate wrote:
> >>>>> Sir greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...
> >>>>>> On Tue, 2 Oct 2018, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I don't trust that Jeff Flake RINO, either.  He said on TV last
> >>>>>>> night that he's not planning to run again, so I wouldn't be at all
> >>>>>>> surprised if he votes against Kavanaugh.  Personally, I suspect
> >>>>>>> that he's worried about something in his own past.  Everybody has
> >>>>>>> their own dirty laundry if you look hard enough.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Now, the Dems are concerned over reports that Kavanaugh threw ice
> >>>>>>> at someone a few decades ago.  I'll just bet that everyone
> >>>>>>> currently on the Supreme Court has never done anything as serious
> >>>>>>> as that!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Throwing ice would make Kavanaugh the perfect Supreme Court
> >>>>>> justice.
> >>>>>> He could throw ice at that old sleeping dinosaur, Ruth Buzzy
> >>>>>> Ginsberg, to wake her up from time to time.  LOL.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Her seat is likely to be the next one filled by Trump... if he can
> >>>>> find anyone else willing to go through the character assassination
> >>>>> that the Dems will undoubtedly cook up.  I'm hoping that the evil
> >>>>> witch Feinstein loses in November.  Time to put that old hag out to
> >>>>> pasture.
> >>>>
> >>>> Why do you want to destroy the Supreme Court, the rule of law, and
> >>>> our Republic?
> >>>
> >>> You are the one who is doing those things in this group.
> >>> You're a Marxist and a communist and you would like nothing better
> >>> than to have our Republic ground to dust by your jackbooted brown
> >>> shirts.
> >> 
> >> No, it's the right wing that will grind it to dust with jackbooted
> >> brown shirts.
> >> 
> >> I come not to destroy the Republic but to save it ... from capitalism:
> >> 
> >> https://medium.com/resistance-poetry/capitalism-is-incompatible-with-
> >> democracy-9335941dcfe5
> >> 
> >> http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/05/americas-brand-of-
> capitalism-
> >> is-incompatible-with-democracy.html
> >> 
> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ft0wIevhS7Y
> >> 
> >> https://foreignpolicy.com/2009/10/12/how-capitalism-is-killing-
> democracy/
> >> 
> >> https://citizenactionmonitor.wordpress.com/2016/01/12/you-can-not-have-
> a-
> >> capitalist-democracy-they-are-radically-incompatible-says-noam-chomsky/
> >> 
> >> https://adrieltrott.com/2017/09/14/the-incompatibility-of-democracy-and-
> >> capitalism/
> >> 
> >> https://blackagendareport.com/capitalism-incompatible-democracy
> >> 
> >> ----------
> >> If you have concentrated wealth, that translates into concentrated
> >> political power, so you really can't have political democracy.
> >> ----------
> > 
> > Just an idea... Those with concentrated wealth, can decide for
> > themselves to make huge donations to whatever they want to, dare I say,
> > the lesser than? This requires no alteration to taxes in a sense. It can
> > even work with 0% tax... ?
> 
> Why should they get to decide? They'll just donate to conservative crap 
> that works against the interests of we, the people ... and more than 
> likely find ways to "donate" through some circuitous route right back to 
> themselves. Hell, they *already* manage that, by buying politicians who 
> then give the companies they own giant crony no-bid contracts or assorted 
> other subsidies!
> 
> The public purse should be controlled by the public.

Why should I get to decide what I give "my" money to? Are you that 
stupid?

Thread

Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:17 +0000
  Re: Was she looking for love ? Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 21:21 -0600
    Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:57 -0700
      Trump is a salesman. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 21:37 -0700
        Re: Trump is a salesman. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 22:06 -0700
        Re: Trump is a salesman. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 06:44 +0000
          Re: Trump is a salesman. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 10:12 -0600
        Re: Trump is a salesman. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:29 -0400
          Trump could sell accusations to a Dr. Ford. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-02 12:53 -0700
          Re: Trump is a salesman. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-02 15:08 -0500
      Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:17 -0400
        Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:56 +0000
  Take your kids and friends with you, please. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 21:45 -0700
    Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:30 -0400
      Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 15:35 -0400
        Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:16 -0700
      China's Slave Trade. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-02 13:01 -0700
        Re: China's Slave Trade. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:10 -0700
      Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:15 -0700
  Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:16 -0400
    Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-02 14:44 +0000
    Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-02 11:11 -0400
    Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 11:14 -0700
      Re: Was she looking for love ? Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-10-02 14:23 -0400
        Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:31 -0700
          Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 16:46 -0400
            Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:54 -0700
              Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 22:22 +0000
                Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:24 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 18:28 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 20:18 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-03 00:53 +0000
                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 20:06 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-03 04:11 +0000
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 07:59 -0600
                Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 10:38 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:47 -0600
                Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 10:50 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:56 -0600
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 16:48 -0600
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 17:09 -0600
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-04 19:49 -0600
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-10-04 19:57 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-10-04 22:57 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-05 10:15 +0100
                Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-02 20:55 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 07:59 -0600
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-03 00:56 +0000
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:00 -0600
                Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-03 10:15 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:33 -0600
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-10-03 10:09 -0700
                Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-03 14:25 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:11 +0100
                Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 10:39 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:48 -0600
                Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 10:52 -0400
                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:57 -0600
                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 16:48 +0100
                Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 16:50 -0500
          Re: Was she looking for love ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 07:04 -0500
        Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:58 +0000
          Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:10 -0700
            Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 20:45 -0700
          Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 16:48 -0600
      Re: Was she looking for love ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-10-02 12:35 -0700
        Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 15:45 -0400
          Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:22 -0700
            Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:33 -0700
            Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 16:48 -0400
              Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:58 -0700
              Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:49 -0700
        Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 12:48 -0700
        Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 16:54 +0100
  Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 10:05 -0600

csiph-web