Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.arch.embedded > #25298

Re: Seriial ports on PCs. (was Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs?)

From Paul <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk>
Newsgroups comp.arch.embedded
Subject Re: Seriial ports on PCs. (was Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs?)
Date 2016-10-30 09:34 +0000
Organization PC Services
Message-ID <MPG.327fcef7b3125ca998980f@172.16.0.1> (permalink)
References <93dc2e49-2495-4149-8f09-305b9038f599@googlegroups.com> <nutopp$7gr$1@dont-email.me> <4c2f9b2e-570c-475a-8838-ef024e90518b@googlegroups.com> <MPG.327e683c448be5f698980e@172.16.0.1> <9q091c9ou458mfg6i85r8n2n4n2bo175ol@4ax.com>

Show all headers | View raw


In article <9q091c9ou458mfg6i85r8n2n4n2bo175ol@4ax.com>, 
upsidedown@downunder.com says...
> 
> On Sat, 29 Oct 2016 09:03:47 +0100, Paul
> <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> >In article <4c2f9b2e-570c-475a-8838-ef024e90518b@googlegroups.com>, 
> >drn@nadler.com says...
> >> 
> >> On Thursday, October 27, 2016 at 4:42:07 PM UTC-4, Don Y wrote:
> >> > ...A TWX would handle this differently than a modern PC, etc....
> >> 
> >> Of course, as a 'modern' PC hasn't had a serial port in a decade ;-)
> >
> >Side point actually not true.
> >
> >For Laptops/netbooks/Phones/tablets that is true.
> 
> Five years ago, I was able to buy a laptop with a _real_ UART, not one
> with on board USB/Serial converter. But I guess this would be
> impossible these days.

Considering most of the mobile type devices are trending to thin as 
possible (meaning breakable as possible), these days to have a true 
serial port on these types of devices and DB9 would require cable 
adapter or docking station.

-- 
Paul Carpenter          | paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk
<http://www.pcserviceselectronics.co.uk/>    PC Services
<http://www.pcserviceselectronics.co.uk/pi/>  Raspberry Pi Add-ons
<http://www.pcserviceselectronics.co.uk/fonts/> Timing Diagram Font
<http://www.badweb.org.uk/> For those web sites you hate

Back to comp.arch.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs? Dave Nadler <drn@nadler.com> - 2016-10-27 13:21 -0700
  Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs? Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2016-10-27 13:41 -0700
    Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs? Dave Nadler <drn@nadler.com> - 2016-10-28 10:42 -0700
      Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs? Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2016-10-28 11:15 -0700
        Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs? Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2016-10-28 11:21 -0700
        Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs? antispam@math.uni.wroc.pl - 2016-10-29 00:17 +0000
          Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs? Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2016-10-28 19:28 -0700
            Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs? upsidedown@downunder.com - 2016-10-29 13:57 +0300
      Seriial ports on PCs. (was Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs?) Paul <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk> - 2016-10-29 09:03 +0100
        Re: Seriial ports on PCs. (was Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs?) upsidedown@downunder.com - 2016-10-29 14:12 +0300
          Re: Seriial ports on PCs. (was Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs?) Paul <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk> - 2016-10-30 09:34 +0000
  Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs? Tim Wescott <seemywebsite@myfooter.really> - 2016-10-27 16:39 -0500
    Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs? Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> - 2016-10-28 01:02 +0300
    Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs? lasselangwadtchristensen@gmail.com - 2016-10-27 15:31 -0700
    Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-10-28 10:17 +0200
      Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-10-28 14:23 +0000
        Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-10-28 16:34 +0200
        Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs? Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2016-10-28 12:02 -0700
      Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs? Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2016-10-28 11:50 -0700
      Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs? upsidedown@downunder.com - 2016-10-29 01:51 +0300
        Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs? upsidedown@downunder.com - 2016-10-29 13:59 +0300
  Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs? Wolfgang Mahringer <yeti201@gmx.at> - 2016-10-28 16:45 +0200
  Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs? Hul Tytus <ht@panix.com> - 2016-10-28 22:28 +0000

csiph-web