Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.food.fast-food > #40788

Re: Hey DildoRider...

Cross-posted to 6 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

In article <naia0o$640$4@news.albasani.net>, Janithor@comcast.net 
says...


> 
> x-no-archive: yes
> 
> On 2/23/2016 10:10 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote:
> > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
> >
> > Janithor, in <news:nah0vj$pkj$1@news.albasani.net> wrote:
> >
> >> On 2/22/2016 10:48 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote:
> >
> >>> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass, in
> >>> <news:o6qncbdoaqme31oc3ka77g1pdtpii3r669@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
> >>> first into the wood chipper again:
> >
> >>>> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
> >>>> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> >
> >>>>> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass, in
> >
> >>>>>>>>> <http://i.imgur.com/SMRGcQY.png>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Showing the Euler sinewave summation equation plotting 170 volt peak
> >>>>>>>>> hot legs translating into 120.208 volt RMS L-N and 208.207 volt L-L,
> >>>>>>>>> as is evidenced in 120/208 wye electrical service, the most ubiquitous
> >>>>>>>>> commercial electrical service.
> >
> >>>>>>>> ROFL!  Fakey, you graphed 3 signals of 120v PEAK, not RMS.
> >
> >>>>>>> WTF? You're retarded. The 170 volt peak sinewaves are in the first
> >>>>>>> three equations, the 120.208 volt RMS L-N are the first resultants.
> >>>>>>> The fourth equation calculates the 208.207 volt RMS L-L, one of the
> >>>>>>> second resultants as a result of summing the first resultants. If you
> >>>>>>> like, I can graph the other two 208.207 volt RMS L-L legs to prove you
> >>>>>>> wrong even further, but there's little point. I'm right, and you're a
> >>>>>>> moron.
> >
> >>>>>> Look at your retarded graphs, spunky monkey.  They clearly
> >>>>>> *peak* at somewhere around +/- 115 to 117v,
> >
> >>>>> The 120.208 volt RMS L-N sinewaves peak at 120.208 volts, moron. LOL
> >
> >>>>>> and +/- 205 to 208v.
> >
> >>>>> The 208.207 volt RMS L-L sinewave peaks at 208.207 volts, moron. LOL
> >
> >>>> So the uneducable moron thinks RMS and peak voltages are
> >>>> identically equal.
> >
> >>> Yeah, you're the uneducable moron who's already demonstrated his
> >>> inability to distinguish between peak-to-peak and RMS when you
> >>> blathered that the graph above was actually a graph of 85 volt RMS.
> >>>
> >>> Shiny Tinfoil Brain wrote:
> >>> <MID:rdomcb169mq5csebugqrbj9ganol8je5s1@4ax.com>
> >>> "You graphed sines with 85v RMS and 147v RMS amplitude."
> >>>
> >>> Yeah, you *are* the moron who demonstrated that you don't know the
> >>> difference between RMS and peak-to-peak. No idea where you're getting
> >>> 147 volts, maybe you're just a moron.
> >>>
> >>> SPNAK!
> >
> >>>> *sigh*... i tried.  You are hopeless, fakey.
> >
> >>> You're delusional. Seek immediate psychiatric help.
> >>>
> >>> <snicker>
> >
> >>>>>> A 120v RMS sinusoid will *peak* at 169.7v.  Duh.
> >
> >>>> You still don't get it.
> >
> >>> Moron.
> >
> >>>> Insert bleatage here:
> >>>> ______________________________
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> "...a sinewave is a Fourier transformation of a circle."
> >>>>     --Fakey
> >
> >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phasor>
> >>> <https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/89/Unfasor.gif>
> >>>
> >>> Message-ID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com>
> >>> =========================================================
> >>> <http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform/>
> >>> See the animations about 1/4th down the page? Yeah, those are Fourier
> >>> transforms transforming circles to sine waves in real time... and in
> >>> the process smearing egg on your stoooopid face. LOL
> >>>
> >>> <http://muller.research.engineering.cornell.edu/sites/WEELS/summer06/Fourier%20Transforms-2D.pdf>
> >>> 2D Fourier transform of a circularly symmetric function translates to
> >>> Bessinc shape in 2-D, translates in 1-D to a sinewave.
> >>>
> >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourier_transform>
> >>> "Still further generalization is possible to functions on groups,
> >>> which, besides the original Fourier transform on R or R" (viewed as
> >>> groups under addition), notably includes the discrete-time Fourier
> >>> transform (DTFT, group = Z), the discrete Fourier transform (DFT,
> >>> group = Z mod N) and the Fourier series or *circular* *Fourier*
> >>> *transform* (group = S^1, the unit circle ~ closed finite interval
> >>> with endpoints identified). The latter is routinely employed to handle
> >>> periodic functions."
> >>>
> >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Periodic_function>
> >>> You know, periodic functions... like sinewaves.
> >>>
> >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sine_and_cosine_transforms>
> >>> "In mathematics, the Fourier sine and cosine transforms are forms of
> >>> the Fourier integral transform that do not use complex numbers."
> >>>
> >>> Gee.. that *Fourier* *sine* *transform* sure looks familiar, doesn't
> >>> it?
> >>>
> >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sine_and_cosine_transforms>
> >>> "Relation with complex exponentials:
> >>> The form of the Fourier transform used more often today is... Euler's
> >>> Formula"
> >>>
> >>> Why, that's the exact equation I used to properly graph 170 volt peak
> >>> 3-phase, which translates to 120.208 volt RMS L-N and 208.207 volt RMS
> >>> L-L. I guess that's why they're called the Euler-Fourier Formulas.
> >>>
> >>> <http://i.imgur.com/NrZzxlb.png>
> >>>
> >>> SPNAK!
> >>> =========================================================
> >>>
> >>> Aren't you the *moron* who k'lamed that Fourier transforms had nothing
> >>> to do with the Euler sinewave summation equation? Yeah... yeah you
> >>> are.
> >>>
> >>> Spankard. Moron. LOL
> >
> >> hi
> >
> > Hi. I assume you're here to clean up the blood and guts after that
> > wicked SPNAK!age I delivered upon the kooks last night. Did you see
> > it? I bootfucked them so hard they have bootprints on the inside of
> > their teeth.
> >
> > <snicker>
> 
> 
> Sorry, I haven't been reading AUK very much the past week or so. 
> Actually I  was going to ask your advice on how I can get % to be 
> friends with me again.

Actually, Fakey was just hoping to use you as an opportunity to proclaim 
he was the spankor, and not the spankee.  Of course the reality is, that 
he's been getting his ass handed to him by everyone in the group that 
understands electrical distribution systems better than he does... which 
IS everybody.  He's still too stubborn and cowardly to admit he's wrong 
though.  He'd rather keep coming up with new constructs to "prove" he's 
always right.  He can't disappoint his daddy again, because daddy finds 
that unacceptable.  It's such a sad story...

-- 

Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote  (Post-Burnore)
Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame
Copyright © 2016 
all rights reserved 

Back to alt.food.fast-food | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Hey DildoRider... "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-23 16:25 -0800

csiph-web