Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1276799
| From | Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.policy |
| Subject | Bug#1124443: debian-policy: misleading information about Priority field in upgrading checklist |
| Date | 2026-01-02 13:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <M8Mil-7vtu-39@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <M8qhQ-7gp2-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <M8s0h-7hDJ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <M8wQh-7kRH-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <M8qhQ-7gp2-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <M8wQh-7kRH-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Hi Russ, On 2026-01-01 11:41, Russ Allbery wrote: > Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org> writes: > > > I don't know what is the maximum allowed length for the upgrading > > checklist. Waht about that: > > > It is no longer recommended to specify the Priority field in source > > package control files. If the field is omitted, dpkg defaults to > > "optional" for the source package priority, and binary packages > > inherit the priority from the source package. > > How about: > > Specifying the ``Priority`` field in source package control fields is > no longer recommended unless the priority needs to be changed from the > default. If the field is omitted, the default source package priority > is ``optional``, and binary packages inherit the priority from the > source package. > > It's not really relevant to the user that dpkg is the component that sets > the default, only what the semantics are. I think this wording may also > make it clearer that you do still need to think about whether you should > provide Priority because the default is wrong. Thanks for proposing this, I find it quite good. Regards, Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurelien@aurel32.net http://aurel32.net
Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#1124443: debian-policy: misleading information about Priority field in upgrading checklist Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org> - 2026-01-01 13:50 +0100
Bug#1124443: debian-policy: misleading information about Priority field in upgrading checklist Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> - 2026-01-01 14:10 +0100
Bug#1124443: debian-policy: misleading information about Priority field in upgrading checklist Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org> - 2026-01-01 15:40 +0100
Bug#1124443: debian-policy: misleading information about Priority field in upgrading checklist Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2026-01-01 20:50 +0100
Bug#1124443: debian-policy: misleading information about Priority field in upgrading checklist Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org> - 2026-01-02 13:20 +0100
Bug#1124443: debian-policy: misleading information about Priority field in upgrading checklist Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> - 2026-01-03 12:20 +0100
csiph-web