Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1274332
| From | Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.devel.qa |
| Subject | Bug#1122902: UDD: lintian results for udeb packages are not properly parsed |
| Date | 2025-12-14 13:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <M1THX-2NWq-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-lint-maint@lists.debian.org User: qa.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: udd Hi, if a package produces a udeb and the udeb package itself triggers a lintian warning/error, it appears that udd does not properly parse that. See [1] as an example. $ lintian libisns-udeb_0.101-1_amd64.udeb E: libisns-udeb udeb: aliased-location [lib/] E: libisns-udeb udeb: aliased-location [lib/libisns.so.0] lintian prepends the string "udeb: " which results in udd having "udeb:" as the tag name and the actual tag is listed under "information". I wonder, whether udd should simply strip off the "udeb: " prefix or if the tagname should be something like "udeb: aliased-location" (assuming those characters are allowed in tag names. I've also CCed the lintian maintainers mailing list for their input. One important aspect here is that udd is used by the testing migration software and aliased-location is a lintian error that will block testing migration for regular debian packages. Regards, Michael [1] https://udd.debian.org/lintian/?packages=open-isns
Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#1122902: UDD: lintian results for udeb packages are not properly parsed Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> - 2025-12-14 13:50 +0100 Bug#1122357: Bug#1122902: UDD: lintian results for udeb packages are not properly parsed Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org> - 2026-01-16 15:50 +0100
csiph-web