Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1260816
| From | Rafael Laboissière <rafael@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist |
| Subject | Bug#1114618: FTBFS against Octave 10 |
| Date | 2025-09-10 11:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <LtoQh-eeZ2-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <Lt7mp-e360-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <Lt88O-e3FY-45@gated-at.bofh.it> <LtbJn-e5Xf-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <LsqKt-dy1Q-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <LtbJn-e5Xf-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Debian GNU/Linux |
* Rafael Laboissière <rafael@debian.org> [2025-09-09 20:49]: > * Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org> [2025-09-09 16:51]: > >> Le mardi 09 septembre 2025 à 16:14 +0200, Rafael Laboissière a écrit : >>> >>> I implemented a solution in dh-octave: https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-octave-team/dh-octave/-/commit/e7497ed114bcf89ccde18ef97ed20f064f17d26f >>> >>> It seems to be working correctly. >>> >>> How should we proceed? I could release the package with the above >>> fix to experimental. Once the tests are complet, you can merge the >>> bug reports that are related to the dpkg-shlibdeps issue and >>> release a new version of dh-octave to unstable, and close the >>> bugs. Is this an acceptable plan? >> >> Thanks for making the change in dh-octave! >> >> I suggest that you upload the new dh-octave directly to unstable. >> This should not break anything with Octave 9, unless I’m missing >> something. >> >> Then we will review bugs individually to check whether they are >> fixed or not by this upload (I think that dynare will need a custom >> fix, maybe vlfeat also if I understand your above commits >> correctly), and directly close those that are indeed fixed by the >> new dh-octave. So we should probably not merge all the bugs. > > Ok, I will upload a new version of dh-octave to unstable as soon as > possible (probably tomorrow). Done! > I will also take care of vlfeat. Also done! Best, Rafael Laboissière
Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#1114618: FTBFS against Octave 10 Rafael Laboissière <rafael@debian.org> - 2025-09-08 19:30 +0200
Bug#1114618: FTBFS against Octave 10 Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org> - 2025-09-08 20:00 +0200
Bug#1114618: FTBFS against Octave 10 Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org> - 2025-09-08 21:10 +0200
Bug#1114618: FTBFS against Octave 10 Rafael Laboissière <rafael@debian.org> - 2025-09-09 09:50 +0200
Bug#1114618: FTBFS against Octave 10 Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org> - 2025-09-09 10:30 +0200
Bug#1114618: FTBFS against Octave 10 Rafael Laboissière <rafael@debian.org> - 2025-09-09 11:30 +0200
Bug#1114618: FTBFS against Octave 10 Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org> - 2025-09-09 11:50 +0200
Bug#1114618: FTBFS against Octave 10 Rafael Laboissière <rafael@debian.org> - 2025-09-09 16:20 +0200
Bug#1114618: FTBFS against Octave 10 Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org> - 2025-09-09 17:10 +0200
Bug#1114618: FTBFS against Octave 10 Rafael Laboissière <rafael@debian.org> - 2025-09-09 21:00 +0200
Bug#1114618: FTBFS against Octave 10 Rafael Laboissière <rafael@debian.org> - 2025-09-10 11:00 +0200
Bug#1114618: FTBFS against Octave 10 Rafael Laboissière <rafael@debian.org> - 2025-09-11 11:20 +0200
csiph-web