Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1260646
| From | Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist |
| Subject | Bug#1114618: FTBFS against Octave 10 |
| Date | 2025-09-09 11:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <Lt397-dZTa-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <Lt1gZ-dYCZ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <Lt1TH-dZ8Q-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Lt2PL-dZLK-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <LsqKt-dy1Q-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <Lt2PL-dZLK-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Debian |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Le mardi 09 septembre 2025 à 11:25 +0200, Rafael Laboissière a écrit : > * Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org> [2025-09-09 10:20]: > > > Le mardi 09 septembre 2025 à 09:39 +0200, Rafael Laboissière a écrit : > > > * Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org> [2025-09-08 21:01]: > > > > > > […] > > > > Le lundi 08 septembre 2025 à 19:43 +0200, Sébastien Villemot a écrit : > > > > > > > > Actually fixing #1061644 would fix the present FTBFS bug and all the > > > > similar ones. > > > > > > > > Should I go ahead? > > > > > > If the fix consists in adding a file to /etc/ld.so.conf.d/, like the > > > torsocks package does¹, I guess it will make Lintian unhappy.² > > > > Yes, that would be the plan. And that would make dpkg-shlibdeps happy. > > Lintian classifies the package-modifies-ld.so-search-path tag as > "type: error". Does this qualify the issue as release-critical? > I see. So adding a drop-in file under /etc/ld.so.conf.d/ is considered bad practice and is discouraged. Actually there is no real need to tell the dynamic linker to look for this additional directory, because as I said before, the .mex files are being loaded from within Octave and liboctmex is already in memory. So an alternative fix is just to tell dpkg-shlibdeps to stop complaining, by passing it the -l option. Ideally this would be done by dh-octave, so that we don’t have to modify all individual packages, but I don’t know whether this is possible. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://sebastien.villemot.name ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ https://www.debian.org
Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#1114618: FTBFS against Octave 10 Rafael Laboissière <rafael@debian.org> - 2025-09-08 19:30 +0200
Bug#1114618: FTBFS against Octave 10 Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org> - 2025-09-08 20:00 +0200
Bug#1114618: FTBFS against Octave 10 Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org> - 2025-09-08 21:10 +0200
Bug#1114618: FTBFS against Octave 10 Rafael Laboissière <rafael@debian.org> - 2025-09-09 09:50 +0200
Bug#1114618: FTBFS against Octave 10 Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org> - 2025-09-09 10:30 +0200
Bug#1114618: FTBFS against Octave 10 Rafael Laboissière <rafael@debian.org> - 2025-09-09 11:30 +0200
Bug#1114618: FTBFS against Octave 10 Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org> - 2025-09-09 11:50 +0200
Bug#1114618: FTBFS against Octave 10 Rafael Laboissière <rafael@debian.org> - 2025-09-09 16:20 +0200
Bug#1114618: FTBFS against Octave 10 Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org> - 2025-09-09 17:10 +0200
Bug#1114618: FTBFS against Octave 10 Rafael Laboissière <rafael@debian.org> - 2025-09-09 21:00 +0200
Bug#1114618: FTBFS against Octave 10 Rafael Laboissière <rafael@debian.org> - 2025-09-10 11:00 +0200
Bug#1114618: FTBFS against Octave 10 Rafael Laboissière <rafael@debian.org> - 2025-09-11 11:20 +0200
csiph-web