Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1270850
| From | Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist |
| Subject | Bug#1106814: 9 NMUs + multiple upstream versions = Unmaintained pkg & salvaging candidate |
| Date | 2025-11-19 20:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <LSWc1-ecyM-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <KRTLr-6Eqk-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <LR7lg-cYyP-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <LSE5r-e0ij-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <KRTLr-6Eqk-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <LSE5r-e0ij-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Debian |
On 2025-11-18 19:14:35, Nicholas D. Steeves wrote:
> Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> writes:
>
>> Hey folks, so this has been flying about for a couple of months now,
>> what's the current status?
>>
>> Is someone willing to own this bug and merge everything?
>>
>> I might take some time to do so in a week or two if no one else steps
>> up...
>
> I'd appreciate if you would review my WIP (which I finally pushed). In
> particular, I'd appreciate your perspective on that potential UX
> enhancement and am wondering if there's a better way to do it and to
> support upstream's efforts to make config migration less painful. The
> obvious downside to upstream's current implementation is that it erases
> comments in the config.
Hmm... I'm not sure. First, I think this should be gated on a `[ -d
/etc/borgmatic ]` otherwise it could crash the postinst on an
unconfigured system:
for i in /etc/borgmatic/*.yaml; do
Did you actually this in a clean install?
I'm not sure we should be doing this for our users though... It seems a
little daring! But why not...
>> And thank you for people for all the NMUs, we're lagging, but not that
>> far behind upstream, thanks to that awesome work...
>
> Would you like to be assimilated into the borg collective? ;)
Not particularly, in fact. I was part of the borg for a while, and I am
happy to have regained my individuality.
> As Andrej said, if you show up and do the work then you're part of the
> collective, and the project is under the salsa/collab-maint group so
> you already have access. I've been testing 2.0.9, but feel free to
> our package forward to 2.0.11 if you prefer.
Well, it's pretty much how the python team works too...
I see you have things well in hands, I'll leave you to it and bash at
this again if I see it needs a hand! :)
a.
--
Our scientific power has outrun our spiritual power. We have guided
missiles and misguided men.
- Martin Luther King, Jr.
Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#1106814: 9 NMUs + multiple upstream versions = Unmaintained pkg & salvaging candidate Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2025-11-14 20:10 +0100
Bug#1106814: 9 NMUs + multiple upstream versions = Unmaintained pkg & salvaging candidate Nicholas D Steeves <sten@debian.org> - 2025-11-19 01:20 +0100
Bug#1106814: 9 NMUs + multiple upstream versions = Unmaintained pkg & salvaging candidate Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2025-11-19 20:40 +0100
Bug#1121156: , RFC: provide better UX for recurring breaking changes Nicholas D Steeves <sten@debian.org> - 2025-11-21 23:50 +0100
Bug#1121156: , RFC: provide better UX for recurring breaking changes Simon Pilkington <simonp.git@mailbox.org> - 2025-11-28 08:20 +0100
Bug#1121156: , RFC: provide better UX for recurring breaking changes Nicholas D Steeves <sten@debian.org> - 2025-11-29 03:30 +0100
Bug#1121156: , RFC: provide better UX for recurring breaking changes Simon Pilkington <simonp.git@mailbox.org> - 2025-11-29 07:30 +0100
csiph-web