Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.devel.release > #137721

Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust)

From David Starner <prosfilaes@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.devel.release, linux.debian.kernel
Subject Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust)
Date 2025-11-04 00:20 +0100
Message-ID <LNc09-agjv-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (4 earlier) <LKSyB-8E97-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <LMOqR-a04G-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <LNa82-af3m-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <LNa82-af3m-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <LNc09-agjv-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On Mon, Nov 3, 2025 at 4:20 PM Jan-Daniel Kaplanski <jd.kaplanski@aol.de> wrote:
>
> > Yes, 20 year old hardware is looking ancient and retro.
> To specify, I was refering to x86-64-v1 hw when I said "reasonably large
> amount of users".

Which works just fine with Rust. It's strictly unhelpful to confound
the two issues.

> > There is no practical reason to use Linux on any of those [...]
> Except for homelabers, in enterprise environments (legacy software!) or
> lab environments (specialised hardware peripherals), etc.

In what cases would you use Linux on any of the four systems I
mentioned for legacy software or specialized hardware peripherals? As
for homelabers, yes, it's fun to make an old Mac run Linux/m68k, but
that doesn't mean it's practical.

> > a Pi 5 soundly beats any of those systems ever made
> And a Threadripper PRO 9995WX based system soundly beats any Pi 5. So
> going by your logic there isn't a practical reason to run Linux on a Pi
> 5, because there is a more capable system out there. That logic isn't
> very sound, yk?

No, a Threadripper PRO 9995WX is way more expensive than a Pi 5, it
draws way more power, it's way louder and takes way more space. You
will save the cost of the Raspberry Pi in a year on electrical costs
alone. There is no practical reason to run Linux on HPPA or Alpha or
SH4 or m68k.

> That only means that in the future you'd have to have a highly
> specialised Rust-dev team in any major OS-related project. And for what
> purpose? Just because everyone does it.

Is this just a grousing session?

-- 
The standard is written in English . If you have trouble understanding
a particular section, read it again and again and again . . . Sit up
straight. Eat your vegetables. Do not mumble. -- _Pascal_, ISO 7185
(1991)

Back to linux.debian.devel.release | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Architecture baseline for Forky Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2025-10-26 13:40 +0100
  Re: Architecture baseline for Forky John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2025-10-26 14:20 +0100
  Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Tony Rodriguez <unixpro1970@gmail.com> - 2025-10-26 19:40 +0100
    Re: Architecture baseline for Forky John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2025-10-26 20:30 +0100
    Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it> - 2025-10-27 12:40 +0100
    Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2025-10-27 12:50 +0100
      Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2025-10-27 18:10 +0100
      Re: Architecture baseline for Forky "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de> - 2025-10-27 22:40 +0100
        Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2025-10-29 09:00 +0100
          Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Peter Green <plugwash@debian.org> - 2025-10-30 07:00 +0100
          Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2025-10-30 15:30 +0100
    Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Rob Landley <rob@landley.net> - 2025-10-27 21:40 +0100
  Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2025-10-27 11:20 +0100
  Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> - 2025-10-27 19:30 +0100
    Re: Architecture baseline for Forky "Nikos Tsipinakis" <nikos@tsipinakis.com> - 2025-10-30 14:40 +0100
  Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Milan Kupcevic <milan@debian.org> - 2025-10-27 22:40 +0100
    Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2025-10-27 23:40 +0100
      Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Marc Haber <mh+debian-release@zugschlus.de> - 2025-10-28 10:10 +0100
    Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky) Romain Dolbeau <romain@dolbeau.org> - 2025-10-28 10:00 +0100
      Re: Planned obsolescence ? (OpenBSD) Paul Tagliamonte <paultag@debian.org> - 2025-11-02 23:30 +0100
      Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust) David Starner <prosfilaes@gmail.com> - 2025-11-04 00:20 +0100
  Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Rob Landley <rob@landley.net> - 2025-12-05 00:20 +0100

csiph-web