Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1251762

Bug#1108231: unblock: shim-signed/1.46 systemd-boot-installer/0.10

From	Julian Andres Klode <jak@debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.devel.release
Subject	Bug#1108231: unblock: shim-signed/1.46 systemd-boot-installer/0.10
Date	2025-07-03 19:10 +0200
Message-ID	<L4vBD-eZyI-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(4 earlier) <L3lO1-eevK-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <L0Tjb-cDww-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <L4vBD-eZyI-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <L0Tjb-cDww-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <L4vBD-eZyI-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Thu, Jul 03, 2025 at 06:46:05PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Julian,
> 
> On 30-06-2025 14:20, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 at 19:42, Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 at 19:41, Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> wrote:
> > > > Reading the MR related to this change [1] I got the impression that the
> > > > bookworm branch of src:grub2 needs to land in bookworm first to prevent
> > > > the risks of apt removing the bootloader. AFAICT this didn't happen yet.
> > > > What's the plan here?
> 
> > Julian says on Matrix:
> > 
> > > we don't technically need the backport in stable for testing, apt applies the Protected: yes at a package level, and will accordingly refuse to move grub from stable because the flag is set in the testing one
> 
> 
> You sounded quite concerned in [2] but the information in the quote above
> doesn't sound like it's new information to you. What made you change you
> mind?

I did not consider that Essential and Protected are evaluated by apt at
the package level rather than the version level :D

It just occured to me again when Luca pinged me :D

-- 
debian developer - deb.li/jak | jak-linux.org - free software dev
ubuntu core developer                              i speak de, en

Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Bug#1108231: unblock: shim-signed/1.46 systemd-boot-installer/0.10 Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> - 2025-06-23 19:40 +0200
  Bug#1108231: unblock: shim-signed/1.46 systemd-boot-installer/0.10 Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> - 2025-06-25 12:50 +0200
  Bug#1108231: unblock: shim-signed/1.46 systemd-boot-installer/0.10 Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2025-06-25 13:10 +0200
  Bug#1108231: unblock: shim-signed/1.46 systemd-boot-installer/0.10 Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> - 2025-06-26 20:40 +0200
  Bug#1108231: unblock: shim-signed/1.46 systemd-boot-installer/0.10 Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> - 2025-06-26 20:50 +0200
    Bug#1108231: unblock: shim-signed/1.46 systemd-boot-installer/0.10 Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> - 2025-06-26 20:50 +0200
      Bug#1108231: unblock: shim-signed/1.46 systemd-boot-installer/0.10 Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> - 2025-06-30 14:30 +0200
        Bug#1108231: unblock: shim-signed/1.46 systemd-boot-installer/0.10 Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> - 2025-07-03 02:00 +0200
  Bug#1108231: unblock: shim-signed/1.46 systemd-boot-installer/0.10 Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> - 2025-07-03 19:00 +0200
  Bug#1108231: unblock: shim-signed/1.46 systemd-boot-installer/0.10 Julian Andres Klode <jak@debian.org> - 2025-07-03 19:10 +0200

csiph-web