Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1236737

Bug#1099627: Bug#1099786: Bug#1099627: RFS: calcurse/4.8.1-1.2 [NMU] [RC] -- text-based calendar and todo manager

From	Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.devel.mentors
Subject	Bug#1099627: Bug#1099786: Bug#1099627: RFS: calcurse/4.8.1-1.2 [NMU] [RC] -- text-based calendar and todo manager
Date	2025-03-08 16:50 +0100
Message-ID	<Ko4B3-4zPc-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<Kn4MO-3T3G-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <Ko1a9-4xuU-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Ko4hH-4zHK-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <Kn4MO-3T3G-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <Ko4hH-4zHK-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	Debian

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

My previous copy of this email was truncated due to:

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1057758

This copy removes a bunch of the quoted text to make it go through.  ;(

On Saturday, March 8, 2025 8:21:32 AM MST Peter B wrote:
> I'm not at all sure about this.
> It seems to me that the Policy wording is ambiguous,
> as I would interpret "copyright information" to imply both the copyright
> notice/statement and the license itself.

Policy 22.8 is not ambiguous, which is the release that added the option to not include all 
copyright information in debian/copyright (previously all copyright information was 
required).  When this change was made, they specifically said:

“Note that there is no change to the requirement to copy *all licensing information* into /
usr/share/doc/PACKAGE/copyright.”

I do agree that without this statement in 22.8 it would be ambiguous.

-- 
Soren Stoutner
soren@debian.org

Thread

Bug#1099627: RFS: calcurse/4.8.1-1.2 [NMU] [RC] -- text-based calendar and todo manager Andrew Bower <andrew@bower.uk> - 2025-03-05 22:50 +0100
  Bug#1099627: RFS: calcurse/4.8.1-1.2 [NMU] [RC] -- text-based calendar and todo manager Andrew Bower <andrew@bower.uk> - 2025-03-07 22:10 +0100
  Bug#1099627: RFS: calcurse/4.8.1-1.2 [NMU] [RC] -- text-based calendar and todo manager Andrew Bower <andrew@bower.uk> - 2025-03-08 08:40 +0100
    Re: Bug#1099627: RFS: calcurse/4.8.1-1.2 [NMU] [RC] -- text-based calendar  and todo manager Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2025-03-08 13:10 +0100
    Bug#1099786: Bug#1099627: RFS: calcurse/4.8.1-1.2 [NMU] [RC] -- text-based calendar and todo manager Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2025-03-08 16:40 +0100
    Bug#1099627: Bug#1099786: Bug#1099627: RFS: calcurse/4.8.1-1.2 [NMU] [RC] -- text-based calendar and todo manager Peter B <peter@pblackman.plus.com> - 2025-03-08 16:40 +0100
      Bug#1099627: Bug#1099786: Bug#1099627: RFS: calcurse/4.8.1-1.2 [NMU] [RC] -- text-based calendar and todo manager Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2025-03-08 16:50 +0100
        Bug#1099627: RFS: calcurse/4.8.1-1.2 [NMU] [RC] -- text-based calendar and todo manager Andrew Bower <andrew@bower.uk> - 2025-03-09 01:30 +0100
        Bug#1099786: Bug#1099627: RFS: calcurse/4.8.1-1.2 [NMU] [RC] -- text-based calendar and todo manager Peter B <peter@pblackman.plus.com> - 2025-03-09 17:00 +0100
  Bug#1099627: closed by Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org> (RFS: calcurse/4.8.1-1.2 [NMU] [RC] -- text-based calendar and todo manager) Andrew Bower <andrew@bower.uk> - 2025-03-19 00:10 +0100

csiph-web