Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1250022

Bug#872726: linux: apparmor doesn't use proper audit event ids

From Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.kernel
Subject Bug#872726: linux: apparmor doesn't use proper audit event ids
Date 2025-06-14 21:50 +0200
Message-ID <KXF33-azxm-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <KTH3r-7ZGP-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <ugzRL-8iD-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <KXF33-azxm-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <ugzRL-8iD-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <KXF33-azxm-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Hi John,

On Tue, Jun 03, 2025 at 02:36:49PM -0700, John Johansen wrote:
> On 6/3/25 14:03, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
> > 
> > Hi Laurent,
> > 
> > On Tue, Jun 03, 2025 at 05:14:12PM +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> > > reopen 872726
> > > found 872726 6.12.30-1
> > > thanks
> > 
> > You reopened this very old issue. I see two aspects: We do not want to
> > have bugs opened forever if there is no chance of a respective
> > upstream change fixing the issue.
> > 
> > So with this in mind I think it would be great if you can try to
> > respin the convesation with upstream and see if there is movement on
> > this topic.
> > 
> > Otherwise, if there is no chance to implement this, we can mark it
> > wontfix (and so this time with an explanation ;-)) and then close and
> > archive it again.
> > 
> > In short: any chance you can try to reach out to upstream for a
> > current state on this topic and loop us back?
> > 
> 
> Yes we can try, and honestly we need to try because this is going to
> become more problematic when we start stacking apparmor with selinux
> as more than just a demo.
> 
> We are about 20 patches away from the upstream kernel being able to
> do this. It will be a few weeks before we can even get to trying this
> but I will add it to the queue of tickets. Maybe I can even get some
> priority on it by tying it to our work to get apparmor available in
> fedora

Do you have a reference were we can point at this bug for following
the current status?

Regards,
Salvatore

Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Bug#872726: linux: apparmor doesn't use proper audit event ids (was: Re: reopening 872726, found 872726 in 6.12.30-1) Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2025-06-03 23:10 +0200
  Bug#872726: linux: apparmor doesn't use proper audit event ids Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2025-06-14 21:50 +0200
  Bug#872726: linux: apparmor doesn't use proper audit event ids Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2025-06-19 01:10 +0200

csiph-web