Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #87892
| From | Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.kernel, linux.debian.devel.release, linux.debian.maint.boot |
| Subject | Re: Uploading linux (6.12.32-1) |
| Date | 2025-06-07 09:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <KUWa5-8PQf-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <KUp4t-8ume-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <KUpnP-8usq-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Hi Cyril, On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 10:23:08PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi, > > Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> (2025-06-05): > > I would like to upload the next version of the 6.12.y stable series to > > unstable (once linux/6.12.30-1 migrates to testing). There are two > > upstream stable versions imported, 6.12.31 and 6.12.32 where 6.12.31 > > was of considerable size (note there is onging merge window for 6.16 > > ongoing and from experience the first few stable series are bigger > > than usual, this might not be the best timing for trixie). > > (Yeah, at this point it seems wise to let .30 migrate.) I don't have a > precise timing for the next d-i release (there are things to consider > which I have little control over), but given we're getting deeper and > deeper into the freeze, maybe we're closer to the point where we should > anticipate stopping kernel uploads, and staging them for publication via > either trixie-proposed-updates (once 13.0 is published) or DSA depending > on the security impacts? > > Anyway, at this point, still no objection to an extra upload. Ack. Yes we need to agree on when to stop doing further stable updates for trixie and postpone them for a DSA or trixie-proposed update, and I'm all ear when you think we should stop. As hopefully clear, we want to do here our best to support the release team and debia-boot work towards the trixie release. > > > We know that for beeing ready for trixie we need to find yet a > > solution for > > https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/1524 (and > > to allow multiple uploads of one upstream version for instance if we > > need to pick a single fix for security reasons and needs to be pushed > > earlier than the next upstream stable version). > > Oh, new challenges. G'luck! Well yes we are bit late on this. > Just out of curiosity: there is no plan to change what the versioning > looks like in bookworm(-proposed-updates) or bookworm-security, right? No there is no plan to change the versioning for bookworm and bookworm-security. And note the version for trxie imports will remain still e.g. 6.12.33-1. Regards, Salvatore
Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Uploading linux (6.12.32-1) Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2025-06-05 22:10 +0200
Re: Uploading linux (6.12.32-1) Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2025-06-05 22:30 +0200
Re: Uploading linux (6.12.32-1) Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2025-06-07 09:30 +0200
csiph-web