Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1243663

Bug#1103595: RM: kitty [s390x] -- RoM; unsupported upstream

From Nilesh Patra <nilesh@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.bugs.dist
Subject Bug#1103595: RM: kitty [s390x] -- RoM; unsupported upstream
Date 2025-04-26 10:50 +0200
Message-ID <KFJot-glOn-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <KEQLn-fJVM-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <KCv8l-e9SL-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <KEY6d-fOJG-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <KDfux-eI6d-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <KEY6d-fOJG-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Control: severity -1 normal

Hello FTP masters,

Please remove kitty from s390x architecture. Upstream has refused
the support for the same, see: https://github.com/kovidgoyal/kitty/issues/8548#issuecomment-2816794626

Thank you.

[ Replying to previous mail on this thread ]

On 24/04/25 11:41 am, Paul Gevers wrote:
> That's OK. Pranav is already looking (in bug 1103595) and they are one 
> of the 390x porters.

A removal of this from testing is triggered in 3 weeks and I don't wish to pressurize
anyone to come up with a patch quickly so I am reassigning this bug to ask FTP master
for a removal in s390x.

If at a later point a s390x patch works *and merged upstream*, we can think
about cherry-picking it as a targeted fix.

>>> Given that soft freeze has now started, is it a sensible time to ask 
>>> for removal
>>> of this package from s390x
> 
> 
> I think that's quite acceptable given the reply from upstream. Removing 
> it now doesn't block Pranav from coming up with a fix in the near future 
> and that would restore it for s390x in trixie.

Yes.

>  Nilesh, do you expect upstream to take patches despite the reply? I take it as 
> similar to your reply: not interested to do the work, but if patches are 
> available that look maintainable, then they are OK.

Yes, they should accept it.

> > You don't need to restrict the archs in d/control, as long as kitty 
> > continues to ftbfs on s390x.
>
> Fully agree. See also [1].

I've just uploaded a new release, mostly to fix a pending CVE.
I've added architecture-is-little-endian in git so this
is picked up the next time.

Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Bug#1103595: kitty: FTBFS on s390x: test failures Chris Hofstaedtler <zeha@debian.org> - 2025-04-19 14:30 +0200
  Bug#1103595: RM: kitty [s390x] -- RoM; unsupported upstream Nilesh Patra <nilesh@debian.org> - 2025-04-26 10:50 +0200
    Bug#1103423: src:kitty: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x Nilesh Patra <nilesh@debian.org> - 2025-04-29 16:10 +0200

csiph-web