Bug#1100767: wsdd: Obsolete conffile /etc/default/wsdd

From	Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.bugs.rc
Subject	Bug#1100767: wsdd: Obsolete conffile /etc/default/wsdd
Date	2025-04-16 10:50 +0200
Message-ID	<KC6D0-dTTO-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<Kw1Zn-9NGy-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <KrD9f-6Xjm-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <KC6D0-dTTO-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <KrD9f-6Xjm-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <KC6D0-dTTO-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Sun, Mar 30, 2025 at 04:33:36PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>...
> Am 30.03.25 um 16:27 schrieb Jeremy Bícha:
> > Why is this issue serious?
> 
> While looking at this, I noticed that wsdd-server (the package taking over
> the file from wsdd) doesn't have a Breaks/Replaces.
> I suppose this can lead to upgrade failures but I haven't actually tested
> that.

Depends: wsdd (= ${binary:Version}) seems to handle most cases,
including moving the conffile from wsdd to wsdd-server.

A bigger issue might be silently losing wsdd.service on upgrade to trixie,
there should be at least a recommends from wsdd to wsdd-server,[1]
which might or might not break the above.

> Regards,
> Michael

cu
Adrian

[1] Ideally depends, but then you have a circular dependency.

Back to linux.debian.bugs.rc | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Bug#1100767: wsdd: Obsolete conffile /etc/default/wsdd Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2025-04-16 10:50 +0200
  Bug#1100767: wsdd: Obsolete conffile /etc/default/wsdd Matt Grant <matt@mattgrant.net.nz> - 2025-04-16 21:50 +0200

csiph-web